UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

 

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

SCHEDULE 14A

 

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No.   )

 

 Filed by the Registrant Filed by a party other than the Registrant

 

Check the appropriate box:
Preliminary Proxy Statement
Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
Definitive Proxy Statement
Definitive Additional Materials
Soliciting Material Pursuant to § 240.14a-12§240.14a-12

 

CARDINAL HEALTH, INC.

 

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Itsin its Charter)

N/A

(NamesName of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

 

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box)box):
No fee required.
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
 (1)Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
 (2)Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
 (3)Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
 (4)Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
 (5)Total fee paid:
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
 (1)Amount Previously Paid:previously paid:
 (2)Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
 (3)Filing Party:
 (4)Date Filed:



Table of Contents

 

Letter to Cardinal Health Shareholders

1

Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders

3

Proxy Summary

4

About Us

4

Fiscal 20182020 Highlights

4

Response to COVID-19

5

Governance and Board Highlights

45

Our 20182020 Board Nominees

5

Addressing the Opioid Crisis

6

AttendingAddressing the Opioid Epidemic

7

Virtual Annual Meeting of Shareholders

8

Roadmap to Voting Matters

8

Corporate Governance

9

9

Board Membership Criteria: What we look for

9

Our Director Nominees

9

Our Board’s Composition and Structure

1517

Our Board’s Primary Role and Responsibilities and Processes

1921

Shareholder Engagement

2125

Director Compensation

2226

Director Compensation for Fiscal 2020

27

Related Person Transactions Policy and Process

Audit Committee Matters

2428

2428

Audit Committee Report

2428

Fees Paid to Ernst & Young LLP

2529

Policy on Pre-Approval of Services Provided by Ernst & Young LLP

2529

Executive Compensation

2630

2630

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

2731

Human Resources and Compensation Committee Report

3439

Executive Compensation Tables

3540

Pay Ratio Disclosure

4850

Shareholder ProposalsEquity Compensation Plan Information

4951

Amendment to Restated Code of Regulations

52

4952

Shareholder Proposals

53

5153

54

Share Ownership Information

5256

Beneficial Ownership

5256

Compliance withDelinquent Section 16(a) of the Exchange ActReports

5357

Other Matters

5458

General Information About the Annual Meeting of Shareholders

5458

Communicating with the Board

5660

Shareholder Recommendations for Director Nominees

5660

Submitting Proxy Proposals and Director Nominations for the Next Annual Meeting of Shareholders

5660

Corporate Governance GuidelinesDocuments

5761

Transfer Agent

57

Other Information

5761

5862


Back to Contents

 

Letter to Cardinal Health Shareholders

Gregory B. Kenny

Independent Lead Director and
incoming Chairman of the Board

September 26, 2018[     ], 2020

Your

Overthepastyear,itismoreapparentthaneverthatCardinalHealthplaysacriticalroleinthehealthcaresupplychain.I,alongwiththerestoftheCardinalHealthBoardofDirectors, is firmly committedhavebeenactivelyengagedaswenavigatetheseunprecedentedtimes,andweremainfocusedonbothstronggovernanceandlong-termvaluecreation.IwillsharetheBoard’sperspectiveontheyearandtheinitiativesunderwaytocreatevaluenowandinthefuture.

Our Fiscal 2020 Performance

In fiscal 2020, the company grew non-GAAP operating earnings and exceeded our non-GAAP diluted earnings per share guidance range. We also surpassed our enterprise cost savings target and furthered initiatives that will optimize our operations, drive sustained savings, and enable value creation for years to high standards of governancecome. At the same time, we increased investments and oversight to assurepartnerships in our Specialty pharmaceutical and Cardinal Health remains focused on building and delivering long-term shareholder value. One of my responsibilities as independent Lead Director is facilitating close coordination and communication betweenat-Home businesses, among other areas.

Additionally, the Board continued to evaluate the company’s portfolio and take a balanced and disciplined capital approach that prioritizes reinvesting in the business, maintaining a strong balance sheet and returning cash to shareholders through dividends. In fiscal 2020, we paid down $1.4 billion of debt, increased the dividend by 1%, and sold the remainder of our equity interest in naviHealth.

Our COVID-19 Response

As the global pandemic continues to unfold, we continue to be fully dedicated to the health and safety of our employees so we can fulfill our mission of delivering critical products and solutions to frontline healthcare workers around the world. We have implemented additional safety and cleaning measures in all locations, and we have maintained operations in all our distribution facilities, nuclear pharmacies, and global manufacturing plants. The Board, as well as the management team.team, are humbled by the efforts of our employees. We also have established a practice of shareholder engagement that providesprovided additional compensation to our frontline teams to demonstrate our gratitude for good communication betweentheir unwavering commitment to our customers and to public health.

As the company responded to the challenges presented by the pandemic, the Board also transitioned to a remote work model. We are holding virtual Board meetings and shareholders, and I look forward to continuing that practice as non-executive Chairman of the Board of Directors.

We have made important progress in a number of areas over the past year, and I want to share the Board’s perspective on some of the changes now underway.

Successful Leadership Transition

Last fall, the Board implemented an orderly leadership transition, which will be completed at thethis year’s Annual Meeting of Shareholders will be virtual as well.

Our Commitment to Diversity and positions the company well for the future. On January 1, 2018, Mike Kaufmann, previously our Chief Financial Officer, becameInclusion

Our Chief Executive Officer, Mike Kaufmann, and joinedour management team remain deeply committed to fostering a culture where every employee brings 100% of themselves to work every day and this includes actively facilitating conversations regarding diversity and inclusion. In the fall of 2019, management began these discussions through an all employee meeting focused specifically on this topic, and in the winter, the team organized a group tour of the National Memorial for Peace and Justice and Legacy Museum in Montgomery, Alabama. Upon their return, Mike shared his reflections on this deeply moving experience in a message to all employees.

Following this experience, and in the aftermath of events in the U.S. throughout this spring and summer, the management team has elevated attention to racial equity and social injustice. In May, they engaged 400 vice presidents and above across the company in a frank discussion on this topic and encouraged these leaders to do the same with their teams. Mike also formed a Diversity and Inclusion Steering Council of senior leaders throughout the company to identify and discuss diversity and inclusion barriers, opportunities, and successes.

Corporate culture has been, and remains, important to the Board. Mike is a 28-year veteran of Cardinal HealthTo further reinforce this commitment, we embedded culture and has held senior leadership positionsdiversity and inclusion metrics in both the Pharmaceutical and Medical segments, in addition to serving as Chief Financial Officer. Mike has brought broad knowledge of the company’s operationsincentive plan goals for fiscal 2020, and deepwe are following the progress of these initiatives with regular management reports and a scorecard. The scorecard included the most recent employee engagement survey results, which showed significant improvements.

Our Board Membership

In addition, the Board itself cultivates a culture of open, direct, and respectful dialogue among our members, who bring an array of skills, backgrounds, and expertise. Mike supports this culture with his open and direct engagement, including executive sessions at the beginning and end of each Board meeting. Over the years, our Board evaluation process, which includes individual director evaluations, has made important contributions to Board culture and this year, to continuously evolve this process, we used a new facilitator to gain additional insights regarding our strengths and improvement opportunities.

We also continue to evolve this culture as we refresh our Board membership. This year, we added two new directors to further diversify our expertise and perspectives. Our most recent addition was Sheri Edison, who joins with extensive global experience to his new role. We are very pleased withboth as a senior legal executive in the initial progress the company is making under his leadership.

Jorge Gomez succeeded Mikemedical device and global packaging industries and as Chief Financial Officer. Jorge was Chief Financial Officer of the Medical segmenta board member for large for-profit and previouslynon-profit organizations. Earlier this summer, we also welcomed Dave Evans, who served as Chief Financial Officer of the Pharmaceutical segment, in addition to roles as both the company’s Treasurer and Corporate Controller. His extensive experience and familiarity with our businesses gave him a strong head start in his new role.

George Barrett, who had served as our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer since 2009, has continued as Executive Chairman of the Board and will do so until the Annual Meeting. George also has actively and effectively represented Cardinal Health in the healthcare public policy arena this past year. We are grateful to GeorgeScotts Miracle-Gro for his strong leadership and commitment to Cardinal Health during his tenure.

Effective at the Annual Meeting, I will assume the role of non-executive Chairman of the Board, having served as Lead Director for the past fourmany years and as a director since 2007. I look forward to continuing to work closely with the full Board and our leadership team to assure that our corporate governance practices continue to be aligned with the best interestsbrings decades of shareholders.financial experience.

In my current role as Lead Director, I work closely with management in developing Board agendas, schedules and topics, including discussions regarding long-term strategies and capital deployment. I also have devoted significant time during my tenure to engagement with our large investors, have been active in overseeing our senior leadership transition and am leading our Board refreshment process described below. As Chairman, I will continue to carry out these responsibilities, working closely with Mike and your Board.

Comprehensive Review of the Business

To establish a foundation for future growth, the Board and management have initiated a comprehensive review of our business focused on our portfolio, cost structure and capital deployment. This review will allow us to more sharply focus on our business and strategy in order to deliver value to our stakeholders. The Boardaddition, Colleen Arnold is actively engaged in this process. Three of our directors have been meeting regularly with senior management to discuss the progress of this review. The full Board receives regular updates, and we have extensive discussions about it.

One of the outcomes of this review was the creation of a valuable partnership with Clayton, Dubilier & Rice to jointly invest in our naviHealth business and accelerate its growth. Earlier in the fiscal year, we exited distribution operations in China, which were management and capital intensive. We also have begun significant cost reduction initiatives and will continue to be disciplined and thoughtful in our capital deployment approach.

Board Refreshment

As noted above, George Barrett will step down from the Board as part of our succession plan. Dave Anderson, Clay Jones and Dave King also are leaving the Board after many years of valuable service. On behalf of the full Board, I wantwould like to thank themher for theirher many contributions, including her leadership regarding the company’s strategic use of information and significant contributions. Wetechnology, and we wish themher well.

Our Nominating and Governance Committee is responsible for identifying and recommending director candidates toThese changes will bring the Board, consistent with criteria that assure a balanced mixtotal number of relevant skills, tenure and diversity of experience and perspective. Earlier in the year, the committee identified, and the Board elected, Akhil Johri as a new director. Akhil has brought additional deep financial expertise and a broad global business background to our Board. The Nominating and Governance Committee has been actively engaged in a search to identify additional directors to complement the expertise and experience13, 12 of our current directors.whom are independent.

 

Cardinal Health|2018 Proxy Statement

Cardinal Health | 2020 Proxy Statement    1


Back to Contents

Board Oversight andOur Ongoing Response to the Opioid Epidemic

I will briefly address our ongoing work regarding the opioid epidemic. The Board is deeply concerned by and attentive to the devastating impact on our communities of the over-prescribing of opioid pain medications and the abusecompany continue to recognize the significant challenges that opioid misuse presents to our society, and the company remains vigilant in our work to detect and deter diversion of pain medicationscontrolled substances. The Board and our Ad Hoc Committee on opioids is active in overseeing the company’s anti-diversion work as well as illegal “street” narcotics. The Board has soughtthe company’s efforts to position Cardinal Health asdefend and resolve opioid litigation.

Last October, the company agreed in principle to a leader in helpingglobal settlement framework with a group of state attorneys general that aims to solve this complex national public health crisis, including through our long-standing Generation Rx programresolve all pending and more recent initiatives, such as those aimed at educating patientsfuture opioid lawsuits by states and prescribers regarding these medications. While we do not prescribe medications, we understand and take seriously our responsibility as a pharmaceutical distributor to maintain a rigorous anti-diversion program and ensure that medications are available for patients who need them.

The Board has been and remains active in overseeing Cardinal Health’s responsepolitical subdivisions. This settlement framework would deliver important resources to the nationwide opioid epidemic, includingcommunities that need them most. The company, with oversight of our opioid anti-diversion program. In February 2018, the Board formed an Ad Hoc Committee and the Board, continues to be active in settlement discussions.

Looking Forward

In fiscal 2020, we demonstrated our adaptability in the face of independent directorsunprecedented change. Going forward, our engaged Board, our strong management team, and our dedicated employees are well-positioned to build upon the Board’s earlier work in this area and further assist the Board in its oversight of opioid-related issues. The Ad Hoc Committee, which consists of myself and three other independent directors, meets regularly and reports at every Board meeting.

Looking Ahead

Cardinal Health has made significant progress in many areas in fiscal 2018, and the Board is committed to building on this progress in fiscal 2019. We are well underway implementing initiatives to position the company for the future, and we are confident about Cardinal Health’s prospects to create value for our shareholders and our other important stakeholders.

operational momentum. On behalf of our Board, of Directors, weI thank you for your share ownership in Cardinal Health and for your continued support of the company. I look forwardTogether, we will enable Cardinal Health to continuingperform our ongoingessential role in healthcare now and active dialogue.into the future.

Sincerely,

Gregory B. Kenny
IndependentLeadDirectorand
incomingChairman of the Board

 

www.cardinalhealth.com

Cardinal Health|20182020 Proxy Statement2


Back to Contents

Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders

Wednesday, November 7, 2018

8:00a.m.EasternTime

CardinalHealth,Inc.
7000 Cardinal Place

Dublin, Ohio 43017

Important notice regardingDue to the availabilitypublic health impact of proxy materials for the coronavirus (“COVID-19”) pandemic and to support the health and well-being of our employees and shareholders, this year’s Annual Meeting of Shareholders (“Annual Meeting”) will be conducted exclusively online without an option for physical attendance. You will be able to be held on November 7, 2018:participate in the virtual meeting online, vote your shares electronically, and submit questions during the meeting by visiting www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/CAH2020.

Date

Wednesday, November 4, 2020

Time

10:00 a.m. Eastern Time

VirtualMeeting

This year’s meeting is a virtual shareholder meeting at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/CAH2020.

RecordDate

September 8, 2020. Only shareholders of record at the close of business on the record date are entitled to receive notice of, and to vote at, the Annual Meeting.

ProxyVoting

Makeyourvotecount. Please vote your shares promptly to ensure the presence of a quorum during the Annual Meeting. Voting your shares now via the Internet, by telephone, or by signing, dating, and returning the enclosed proxy card or voting instruction form will save the expense of additional solicitation. If you wish to vote by mail, we have enclosed an addressed envelope with postage prepaid if mailed in the United States. Submitting your proxy now will not prevent you from voting your shares during the Annual Meeting, as your proxy is revocable at your option. We are requesting your vote to:

Items of Business

(1)

Elect the 13 director nominees named in the proxy statement;


(2)

Ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent auditor for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2021;


(3)

Approve, on a non-binding advisory basis, the compensation of our named executive officers;


(4)

Approve an amendment to our Restated Code of Regulations to reduce the share ownership threshold for calling a special meeting of shareholders;


(5)

Vote on two shareholder proposals described in the accompanying proxy statement, if properly presented at the meeting; and


(6)

Transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment or postponement.

MeetingDetails

See “Proxy Summary” and “Other Matters” for details.

ImportantnoticeregardingtheavailabilityofproxymaterialsfortheAnnualMeetingtobeheldonNovember4,2020: The Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders, the accompanying proxy statement and our fiscal 20182020 Annual Report to Shareholders are available at www.edocumentview.com/cah.www.proxyvote.com. These proxy materials are first being sent or made available to shareholders commencing on September 26, 2018.

Purpose

To vote on the following proposals:

(1)

To elect the nine director nominees named in the proxy statement;[     ], 2020.

(2)

To ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent auditor for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2019;

(3)

To approve, on a non-binding advisory basis, the compensation of our named executive officers;

(4)

To vote on two shareholder proposals described in the accompanying proxy statement, if properly presented at the meeting; and

(5)

To transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment or postponement.

Who may vote:

Shareholders of record at the close of business on September 10, 2018 are entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the meeting or any adjournment or postponement.

 

By Order of the Board of Directors.

 

September 26, 2018

JessicaL.MayerJohn M. Adams, Jr.
ExecutiveSenior Vice President, Associate General Counsel and SecretarVicePresident,DeputyGeneralCounsely
andCorporateSecretarySeptember [     ], 2020

 

Cardinal Health|2018 Proxy Statement

Cardinal Health | 2020 Proxy Statement    3


Back to Contents

Proxy Summary

This summary highlights certain information contained elsewhere in our proxy statement. This summary does not contain all the information that you should consider, and you should carefully read the entire proxy statement and our fiscal 20182020 Annual Report to Shareholders before voting. References to our fiscal years in the proxy statement mean the fiscal year ended or ending on June 30 of such year. For example, “fiscal 2018”2020” refers to the fiscal year ended June 30, 2018.2020.

About Us

Headquartered in Dublin, Ohio, we are a global integrated healthcare services and products company providing customized solutions for hospitals, healthcare systems, pharmacies, ambulatory surgery centers, clinical laboratories, physician offices and patients in the home. We distribute pharmaceuticals and medical products and provide cost-effective solutions that enhance supply chain efficiency. We connect patients, providers, payers, pharmacists and manufacturers for integrated care coordination and better patient management. We manage our business and report our financial results in two segments: Pharmaceutical and Medical.

Fiscal 20182020 Highlights

InDuring fiscal 2018,2020, we positioned the company for future growth, making a number of changes. In November 2017, we announced our succession plans for Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, followed by other senior leadership changes later in the fiscal year. These transitions have gone very well.

In January 2018, Michael C. Kaufmann became our Chief Executive Officer, succeeding George S. Barrett, who had served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer for nine years. Mr. Kaufmann is a 28-year veteran of Cardinal Health who has held a range of senior leadership roles in both segments. He was most recently Chief Financial Officer and also oversaw Global Sourcing.

Mr. Barrett became Executive Chairman of the Board in January 2018 and will retire from the Board at the 2018 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. Following Mr. Barrett’s retirement, Mr. Kenny, the Board’s independent Lead Director, will become the non-executive Chairman of the Board.

Jorge M. Gomez succeeded Mr. Kaufmann as Chief Financial Officer. Over his 12-year career with Cardinal Health, Mr. Gomez has served as Chief Financial Officer for both segments, as well as Treasurer and Corporate Controller.

In February 2018, Jon L. Giacomin transitioned to Chief Executive Officer — Medical Segment from Chief Executive Officer — Pharmaceutical Segment. During his nearly 17 years at Cardinal Health, Mr. Giacomin has served in a variety of operational leadership positions.

The following are fiscal 2018 performance highlights:

Revenue increased 5% to $136.8 billion, in line with the Board-approved budget.

GAAPgrew non-GAAP operating earnings, were $126 million, reflecting a non-cash Medical segment goodwill impairment charge. Non-GAAP operating earnings of $2.6 billion would have been in line with budget, except for disappointing performance byexceeded our Cordis business and an incremental 401(k) plan contribution for all U.S. employees.

GAAPnon-GAAP diluted earnings per share (“EPS”) guidance range, surpassed our enterprise cost savings target, and strengthened our balance sheet, all while continuing to execute on our long-term strategic priorities in a rapidly changing environment.

We achieved fiscal 2020 results as we adapted our operations to address the unique challenges presented by COVID-19. In response to the pandemic, we continued to maintain operations in all our distribution facilities, nuclear pharmacies and global manufacturing plants and successfully transitioned our office employees to a remote work model. Through all of this, our focus remained on delivering critical products and services to our customers, while protecting the health and safety of our employees.

Fiscal 2020 highlights include:

Revenue was $0.81. Non-GAAP EPS$152.9 billion, up 5% from the prior year.

GAAP operating loss was $5.00, in line with budget.$(4.1) billion due to an opioid litigation charge and non-GAAP operating earnings were $2.4 billion, a 1% increase over the prior year. Non-GAAP operating earnings underperformance wasgrew despite an estimated net negative impact of approximately $100 million from COVID-19.

We returned over $900 million to shareholders in dividends ($569 million) and share repurchases ($350 million) and repaid $1.4 billion of long-term debt.

Our Pharmaceutical segment’s performance exceeded our expectations. Revenue grew 6% to $137.5 billion. Segment profit decreased 4% to $1.8 billion, reflecting the expected adverse impact of Pharmaceutical Distribution customer contract renewals.

Our Medical segment’s revenue decreased 1% percent to $15.4 billion due to the adverse impact from COVID-19. Segment profit increased 15% to $663 million largely due to cost savings and the favorable year-over-year impact of a supplier charge taken last year, partially offset by the benefitsnegative impact of U.S. tax reform that arose after we had set our budget.COVID-19.

Operating cash flow was $2.8 billion due to working capital changes.We surpassed our enterprise cost savings target, with significant savings contributions from the Medical segment’s global manufacturing and supply chain organization.

To establish a foundation for future growth, we initiated a comprehensive reviewWe completed the divestiture of our business focused on our portfolio, cost structure and capital deployment. Fiscal 2018 accomplishments and future areas of focus include:successful investment in naviHealth.

We divested our China distribution businessagreed in principle to a global settlement framework designed to resolve all opioid lawsuits and createdclaims by states and political subdivisions and continue to work with state attorneys general and representatives of political subdivisions to achieve a partnership with Clayton, Dubilier & Rice to jointly invest in naviHealth and accelerate its growth. These moves allow us to more sharply focus on our other businesses and strategy.global settlement.

Our generic pharmaceuticals program performed better than expected with a slight favorable impact on Pharmaceutical segment profit after several years of a negative impact.

We achievedlaunched “Our Path Forward” outlining the plans and initiatives underway to advance our fiscal 2018 goal of at least $0.21 accretion in non-GAAP EPS from the Patient Recovery businesscorporate culture objectives. We added new culture goals to our annual cash incentive and are focused on successfully integrating and operating the business.

We installed a new management team in the Cordis business that is addressing operational issues, while maintaining sales momentum.

Using new tools and analytics, we have launched significant cost reduction initiatives.

We returned $1.1 billion to shareholders, including $581 million in dividends and $550 million inperformance share repurchases, and we will continue to be disciplined and thoughtful in our capital deployment approach.unit (“PSU”) programs.

See Annex A for reconciliations to the comparable financial measures prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) and the reasons why we use non-GAAP financial measures and reconciliations to the comparable GAAP financial measures.

Governance and Board Highlights

 

www.cardinalhealth.com

Cardinal Health|20182020 Proxy Statement4


Back to Contents

Our 2018 Board Nominees

Colleen F. Arnold

Carrie S. Cox

Calvin Darden

Retired SVP, Sales and Distribution, IBM

Age: 61

Director since 2007

Independent

Committees:

N

Retired EVP and President, Global Pharmaceuticals, Schering-Plough and retired Chairman and CEO, Humacyte, Inc.

Age: 61

Director since 2009

Independent

Committees:

H, AH

Retired SVP of
U.S. Operations, UPS

Age: 68

Director since 2005

Independent

Committees:

H, AH

Bruce L. Downey

Patricia A. Hemingway Hall

Akhil Johri

Retired Chairman and CEO, Barr Pharmaceuticals and Partner, NewSpring Health Capital II, L.P.

Age: 70

Director since 2009

Independent

Committees:

A, AH

Retired President and CEO, Health Care Service Corporation

Age: 65

Director since 2013

Independent

Committees:

A, N

CFO, United Technologies

Age: 57

Director since 2018

Independent

Committees:

A

Michael C. Kaufmann

Gregory B. Kenny

Nancy Killefer

CEO, Cardinal Health

Age: 55

Director since 2018

Retired President and CEO,

General Cable

Age: 65

Director since 2007

IndependentLeadDirector

Committees:

N, AH

Retired Senior Partner, Public Sector Practice, McKinsey

Age: 64

Director since 2015

Independent

Committees:

H

A: Audit     AH: Ad Hoc N: Nominating and Governance       H: Human Resources and Compensation


Cardinal Health|2018 Proxy Statement5


BackResponse to ContentsCOVID-19

AddressingAs a global manufacturer and distributor of medical and laboratory supplies and a distributor of pharmaceutical products, we are an essential and critical link in the Opioid Crisishealthcare supply chain. During the COVID-19 pandemic, our mission has been more important than ever as we have worked to quickly get critical medicines and medical supplies into the hands of our healthcare provider customers who need them.

Given the unprecedented surge in demand for certain personal protective equipment (“PPE”), supporting delivery of these critical products has been a priority, and we continue to work to address the increased demand. In furtherance of this goal, we worked with U.S. and foreign trade authorities to speed shipments of product, we acquired additional equipment to expand our own production of PPE, and we evaluated additional suppliers to expand and diversify critical product options.

Protecting the health and safety of our employees and their families throughout this pandemic has been vital. Because we are part of a critical infrastructure industry, our employees have continued their important work in our distribution centers, manufacturing sites, pharmacies and other clinical sites. Their efforts have been essential to the healthcare system.

To prevent the spread of COVID-19 and protect the safety of our critical frontline employees, all facilities are thoroughly cleaned regularly, and we have implemented worksite hygiene practices in accordance with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and World Health Organization guidelines. And to recognize the important contributions made by our frontline employees, we provided them additional compensation.

All employees who have been able to work remotely have been working from home. We expanded our technology infrastructure to help our employees around the globe perform their duties and continue to support customers, patients and our frontline associates. We also put policies in place to allow employees who are sick with or who have been exposed to COVID-19 to take time off without impacting their paid-time-off days.

Our Board of Directors (“Board”) has been highly engaged with management about the impact of COVID-19 and the entire Cardinal Health team care deeplycompany’s response and plans. The Board has held regular informational calls with management about the devastatingCOVID-19, covering employees and operations, financial impact, onproduct supply, media engagement, and related legal and regulatory matters.

Governance and Board Highlights

12 of our communities13 director nominees are independent Independent, non-executive Chairman of the over-prescribingBoard Ongoing Board refreshment: four new experienced directors added in the last 12 months Six of opioid pain medicationsour director nominees are gender or ethnically diverse Director nominees with diverse business experiences, backgrounds and expertise in a wide range of fields, including nine with significant healthcare experience Significant Board engagement on strategy and capital deployment (page 21) Board oversight and engagement relating to the abusecompany’s work during the COVID-19 pandemic (page 21) Board monitors corporate culture through annual review of pain medicationscross-functional culture scorecard (page 23) Directors interact with key talent through Board discussions, informal events and illegal “street” narcotics. We are working to help solve this complex national public health crisis. Like so many others across this nation, we have family members, friends and colleagues who have been impacted byplanned one-on-one sessions (page 21) Ad Hoc Committee assists the devastating consequencesBoard in its oversight of opioid overuse and abuse. We also have family members, friends and colleagues who rely on these medications to address suffering associated with terminal illnesses, painful neurological conditions, severe injuries and recovery from surgeries.

Oneopioid-related issues (page 20) Surgical Gown Recall Oversight Committee assists the Board in its oversight of the keysurgical gown recall announced in January 2020 (page 20) Long-standing, proactive shareholder engagement program (page 25) Well-developed Board and individual director evaluation process (page 24) Annual election of directors with majority voting Director service on other public policy issues that must be solved in addressing the opioid epidemiccompany boards is the challenge posed by the over-prescribinglimited to three or just their own board if a director is an executive of opioids. As a pharmaceutical wholesale distributor, we do not control either the supply of, or the demand for, opioids, since we do not manufacture medications or write prescriptions. We understand and take seriously our responsibility to maintain a rigorous anti-diversion program, while ensuring that medications are available for patients who need them. And, of course, we do not have any involvement with the serious problem of dangerous illegal street drugs.another public company

Role in Pharmaceutical Supply Chain and Supply Chain Integrity

Anti-diversion Program

We distribute all types of medications, including those used to treat high blood pressure, diabetes and cancer, as well as those used to treat acute and chronic pain. With respect to opioid pain medications, we are industry leaders in implementing state-of-the-art controls to combat the diversion of these medications from legitimate uses. Our program includes advanced analytics, technology and on-the-ground deployment of investigators to evaluate our pharmacy customers, scrutinize their orders and block and report orders that do not meet our strict anti-diversion criteria. We continuously improve our program, while remaining committed to our critical role in supplying pharmacies the medications that they need for their patients.

Knowing our customers

Electronic monitoring and analytics

We use a multi-factor process to evaluate pharmacies before they become our customer, including taking steps to understand their business and historical prescription drug ordering patterns.

Every order for a controlled substance passes through our order monitoring system, which tracks the order against statistical benchmarks for signs of potential diversion. If an order is deemed suspicious, it is canceled and reported to the DEA and applicable state regulators.

Site visits

Management Committee

We have a team of experienced investigators, including former DEA and state investigators, who regularly conduct customer site visits, both announced and unannounced.

We have a committee of senior anti-diversion and regulatory experts and supply chain integrity staff that meets regularly to evaluate customers with large-volume orders of controlled substances.

 

www.cardinalhealth.com

Cardinal Health|20182020 Proxy Statement6    5


Back to Contents

Our 2020 Board Nominees

Carrie S. CoxCalvin DardenBruce L. DowneySheri H. Edison
Retired EVP and President,
Global Pharmaceuticals,
Schering-Plough and retired
Chairman and CEO,
Humacyte, Inc.
Age: 62
Director since 2009
Independent
Committees: H, AH
Retired SVP of
U.S. Operations, UPS
Age: 70
Director since 2005
Independent
Committees: H, AH
Retired Chairman and CEO,
Barr Pharmaceuticals and
Partner, NewSpring Health
Capital II, L.P.
Age: 72
Director since 2009
Independent
Committees: N, AH
EVP and General Counsel,
Amcor
Age: 63
Director since 2020
Independent
David C. EvansPatricia A. Hemingway HallAkhil Johri
Retired CFO, Scotts
Miracle-Gro and Battelle
Memorial Institute
Age: 57
Director since 2020
Independent
Retired President and CEO,
Health Care Service Corp.
Age: 67
Director since 2013
Independent
Committees: H, N
Retired EVP and CFO,
United Technologies
Age: 59
Director since 2018
Independent
Committees: A, S
Michael C. KaufmannGregory B. KennyNancy Killefer
CEO, Cardinal Health
Age: 57
Director since 2018
Retired President and CEO,
General Cable
Age: 67
Director since 2007
Independent
Chairman of the Board
Committees: N, AH, S
Retired Senior Partner,
Public Sector Practice, McKinsey
Age: 66
Director since 2015
Independent
Committees: H, S
J. Michael LoshDean A. ScarboroughJohn H. Weiland
Retired EVP and CFO,
General Motors
Age: 74
Director since 2018
Independent
Committees: A
Retired Chairman and CEO,
Avery Dennison
Age: 64
Director since 2019
Independent
Committees: A
Retired President and
Chief Operating Officer,
C. R. Bard
Age: 64
Director since 2019
Independent
Committees: A, S

A: Audit  AH: Ad Hoc  H: Human Resources and Compensation  N: Nominating and Governance  S: Surgical Gown Recall Oversight


www.cardinalhealth.com

Cardinal Health | 2020 Proxy Statement    6


Back to Contents

Addressing the Opioid Epidemic

We care deeply about the opioid epidemic and take seriously our commitment, in cooperation with other participants in the prescription drug supply chain, to find and support solutions to this national challenge.

As a distributor and an intermediary in the supply chain, we provide a secure channel to deliver all kinds of medications from the hundreds of manufacturers that make them to the thousands of our hospital and pharmacy customers licensed to dispense them to their patients, and we work diligently to identify, stop and report to regulators any suspicious orders of controlled substances. As threats evolve, we constantly adapt our system to prevent the diversion and misuse of medications.

Global Settlement Framework

In October 2019, following review and extensive engagement with both the Ad Hoc Committee and the Board, we agreed in principle with a leadership group of state attorneys general to a global settlement framework designed to resolve all pending and future opioid lawsuits and claims by states and political subdivisions.

We remain committed to being part of the solution to this epidemic, and we continue to actively work with the state attorneys general and representatives of political subdivisions to achieve a global settlement.

Board Engagement and GovernanceOversight

The Board is committedremains active in overseeing our response to ensuring that Cardinal Health is a positive force in solving the opioid epidemic. The Board and its committees regularly review our anti-diversion and controlled substance monitoring systems and our ethics and compliance program with members of management who are responsible for the day-to-day operation of these systems and program. The Board also has supported the company’s Opioid Action Program and its initiatives aimed at addressing the crisis.

In 2012, the Board appointed a special committeeBoard’s Ad Hoc Committee comprised of independent directors to conduct a review, utilizing independent counsel, of our anti-diversion program. The committee produced reports in 2013Cox, Darden, Downey and 2014 that found that we had implemented and maintained a robust system of controls to detect and report suspicious orders and that our Board was well-informed about those controls. More details about this special committee and its reports are found on our website at www.cardinalhealth.com under “About Us — Corporate Citizenship — Addressing the Opioid Crisis: Board Engagement and Governance.”

In February 2018, the Board formed an Ad Hoc Committee of independent directors to assistKenny assists the Board in its oversight of opioid-related issues. The Ad Hoc Committee, is responsible for assistingwhich was formed in February 2018, continues to meet twice per quarter and engage with the other directors on opioid-related issues at every Board in overseeing the company’s multifaceted response to the opioid epidemic and providing advice, regular reports and recommendations to the Board on these issues. The members of the Ad Hoc Committee are:meeting.

BruceL.Downey,Chair

GregB.Kenny

CarrieS.Cox

CalvinDarden

Retired Chairman and CEO of Barr Pharmaceuticals

Began career at U.S. Department of Justice and was later a partner at
Winston & Strawn

Director since 2009

Independent Lead Director

Incoming Chairman of the Board

Retired President and CEO of General Cable

Director since 2007

Retired EVP and President Global Pharmaceuticals,
Schering-Plough

Director since 2009

Retired SVP of U.S. Operations, UPS

Director since 2005

The Ad Hoc Committee met seven times from February 2018 through September 2018is receiving regular updates on progress toward a global settlement as well as updates on the status of litigation and will continue to meet regularly. During its meetings, the Ad Hoc Committee receivesgovernment investigations, our anti-diversion program, legislative and discusses reports from managementregulatory developments, and the company’s external advisors (as appropriate) and provides input and direction. For example, the Ad Hoc Committee receives updates regarding:shareholder engagement.

anti-diversion and controlled substance monitoring programs;

potential solutions to alleviate the opioid epidemic;

risks posed by the opioid epidemic to Cardinal Health from a legal, financial and reputational perspective;

litigation, including the Multi-District Litigation before Judge Polster in Ohio and related settlement discussions;

the investigations and negotiations led by the State Attorneys General “Multistate” Group;

changes in the regulatory and legislative environment;

Cardinal Health’s Opioid Action Program; and

corporate governance and engagement with key stakeholder groups, including shareholders, customers, employees and others.

Generation Rx and Opioid ActionAnti-Diversion Program

Cardinal Health has beenWe are always vigilant in combating the diversion of controlled substances for improper use. We have continually upgraded our program to make sure it is robust and effective in a leader for nearlycontext of evolving risks. Our team includes investigators, data analysts, former law enforcement officers, pharmacists, and compliance officers.

We carefully evaluate pharmacies before they become customers, including taking steps to understand their business and historical prescription drug ordering patterns. We use this information, along with statistical models and other criteria, to establish pharmaceutical distribution thresholds specific to each customer. When a decade in pioneeringcustomer’s order exceeds an established threshold, the order is held, reviewed further, and supporting impactful prevention and education programs to combat opioid abuse and diversion under the umbrella of Generation Rx. In November 2017, we began our Opioid Action Program with four elements, each cited by leading experts as criticaltypically canceled. Canceled orders are reported to the fightU.S. Drug Enforcement Administration and any required state regulators. We also have a team of experienced investigators who conduct regular site visits to reduce opioid abuse and casualties:

Medical school training

With our support, more than 90 medical school faculty members from 30 schools recently gathered to begin work on a curriculum for medical schoolscustomers across the country to teach future physicians better prescribing practiceslook for any visible signs of diversion.

Our Efforts to manage pain and how to respond to prescription opioid misuse and abuse. The participants are developing a white paper detailing an opioid-management curriculum that can be adopted and implemented by medical schools nationwide.

Prevention education and better prescribing practicesFight Prescription Opioid Misuse

We have awarded over 70 grants, includinginvested millions of dollars in fighting prescription opioid misuse. This work began with Generation Rx, an evidence-informed prevention education grants, prescriber grants and communityawareness program designed for anyone to use to educate people of all ages about safe medication practices and the potential dangers of misusing prescription medications. Generation Rx was founded at The Ohio State University College of Pharmacy and has partnered with the Cardinal Health Foundation since 2009. To date, its medication safety messages have reached more than two million people across the country.

In the last three years, we have awarded grants to non-profitmore than 70 organizations fighting opioid abuseto build awareness, expand drug takeback initiatives, and misuse and providing education, advocacy and support.

Narcan donation program

support healthcare systems as they work to reduce the number of opioids their providers prescribe. We have provided more than 75,000 dosage units of overdose-reversing Narcan free of charge for use by first responders and law enforcement.

Drug take back

In partnershippartnered with a customer, we supportedKroger to host biannual drug take-back events at over 100 locations in 26 states during 2018, with more than 100 Cardinal Health employee volunteers200 pharmacy locations across the country. And we launched an online training for all U.S. employees to help them better understand the epidemic, our commitment to fighting it, and local law enforcement and DEA officials providing safe, secure disposal of medications.how they can support the work.

 

Cardinal Health|2018 Proxy StatementCardinal Health | 2020 Proxy Statement    7


Back to Contents

Attending theVirtual Annual Meeting of Shareholders

See page 55

Time and Date Wednesday, November 4, 2020 10:00 a.m. Eastern Time Place Virtual Meeting www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/CAH2020 Record Date September 8, 2020

Due to COVID-19, this year’s Annual Meeting will be conducted exclusively online without an option for instructionsphysical attendance. You will be able to participate in the virtual Annual Meeting online, vote your shares electronically, and submit questions during the meeting by visiting www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/CAH2020 and entering the 16-digit control number included in the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, voting instruction form or proxy card that was sent to you with this proxy statement.

If you do not have a 16-digit control number, you may still attend the meeting as a guest in listen-only mode. To attend as a guest, please visit www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/CAH2020 and enter the information requested on the screen to register as a guest. Please note that you will not have the ability to vote or ask questions during the meeting if you participate as a guest.

For further information on how to gain admission to Cardinal Health’s 2018attend and participate in the virtual Annual Meeting, of Shareholders (the “Annual Meeting”).please see “Other Information” on page 58 in this proxy statement.

Roadmap to Voting Matters

Shareholders will be asked to vote on the following proposals at the Annual Meeting:

Proposal

Board Recommendation

Page Reference

Proposal 1: to elect the nine13 director nominees named in this proxy statement

FOR each director nominee

9

Proposal 2: to ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent auditor for the fiscal year ending June 30, 20192021

FOR

2428

Proposal 3: to approve, on a non-binding advisory basis, the compensation of our named executive officers

FOR

2630

Proposal 4: shareholder proposal onto approve an amendment to our Restated Code of Regulations to reduce the share ownership threshold for calling a policy to not exclude legal and compliance costs for purposesspecial meeting of determining executive compensationshareholders

AGAINSTFOR

4952

Proposal 5:5: shareholder proposal onto reduce the share ownership threshold for calling a special meeting of shareholders

AGAINST

5153

Proposal6:shareholder proposal to adopt a policy that the chairman of the board be an independent director

AGAINST

54

How to Vote in Advance of the Annual Meeting

You can return voting instructions in advance of the Annual Meeting by any of the means set forth below. Internet or telephone voting is available until Wednesday, November 3, 2020 at 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time.

Internet Visit 24/7 www.proxyvote.com Telephone Call the toll-free number 1-800-690-6903 within the United States, U.S. territories or Canada and follow the instructions provided by the recorded message Mail Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it by mail in the enclosed postage-paid envelope

 

www.cardinalhealth.com

Cardinal Health|20182020 Proxy Statement8


Back to Contents

Corporate Governance

Election of Directors

Our Board of Directors currently has 1214 members. NineThirteen of our directors are standing for election at the Annual Meeting to serve until the next Annual Meeting of Shareholders and until their successor is duly elected and qualified. Other than Messrs. Kaufmann and Johri, who joined the Board in January and February 2018, respectively, all nominees were elected at last year’s Annual Meeting of Shareholders. Given his retirement at the Annual Meeting, Executive Chairman of the Board Barrett is not standing for re-election. In addition, Clayton M. Jones and David P. King, directorsqualified or until their earlier resignation, removal from office or death. Colleen F. Arnold, a director since 2012 and 2011, respectively, have2007, has decided not to stand for re-election at the Annual Meeting. The size of the Board will be reduced to nine13 at that time.

David J. Anderson, a director since 2014, resigned from the Board in September 2018 in light of his new responsibilities as Chief Financial Officer of Nielsen Holdings plc.

Each director nominee agreed to be named in this proxy statement and to serve if elected. If, due to death or other unexpected occurrence, one or more of the director nominees is not available for election, proxies will be voted for the election of all remaining nominees and any substitute nominee the Board selects.

The Board recommends that you vote FOR the election of the nominees listed on pages 10 to 14.through 16.

Board Membership Criteria: What we look for

The Nominating and Governance Committee considers and reviews with the Board the appropriate skills and characteristics for Board members in the context of the Board’s current composition and objectives. Criteria for identifying and evaluating candidates for the Board include:

business experience, qualifications, attributes and skills, such as relevant industry knowledge (including pharmaceutical, medical device and other healthcare supply chain and logistics)industry knowledge), operations, management, information technology, accounting and finance, strategic planningoperations, technology and international markets;

leadership experience as a chief executive officer, senior executive or leader of a significant business operation or function;

financial and accounting experience as a chief financial officer;

independence (including independence from the interests of a particularany single group of shareholders);

judgment and integrity;

ability to commit sufficient time and attention to the activities of the Board;

diversity of age, gender and ethnicity; and

absence of potential conflicts with our interests; andinterests.

such other criteria as the Board may determine relevant.

Our Director Nominees

The Board seeks members that possess the experience, skills and diverse backgrounds to perform effectively in overseeing the company’sour current and evolving business and strategic direction and to properly perform the Board’s oversight responsibilities. All of our director nominees bring to the Board a wealth of executive leadership experience derived from their diverse professional backgrounds and areas of expertise. As a group, they have business acumen, healthcare and global business experience and financial expertise, as well as public company board experience. EachIn addition, six of ourthe thirteen director nominees are gender or ethnically diverse. Each director nominee has sound judgment and integrity and is able to commit sufficient time and attention to the activities of the Board. All director nominees other than our Chief Executive Officer are independent.

 

Cardinal Health|2018 Proxy StatementCardinal Health | 2020 Proxy Statement    9


Back to Contents

Colleen F. Arnold

Senior Vice President, Sales

Age 62

Director since 2009

Board Committees:

Human Resources and Distribution, International Business Machines Corporation (retired)

Director Qualification HighlightsCompensation, Ad Hoc

  Information Technology

  International and Global Leadership

  Operations

Other Public Boards:

WestRock Company, a multinational provider of paper and packaging solutions (since July 2018)

Age 61

Director
since:2007

Board Committees:
Nominating and Governance

Independent Director

Biography

Ms. Arnold was Senior Vice President, Sales and Distribution of International Business Machines Corporation (“IBM”), a provider of systems, financing, software and services, from 2014 until 2016. From 1998 to 2014, she held a number of senior positions with IBM, including: Senior Vice President, Application Management Services, IBM Global Business Services; General Manager of GBS Strategy, Global Consulting Services, Global Industries and Global Application Services; General Manager, Europe; General Manager, Australia and New Zealand Global Services; and CEO, Global Services Australia, an IBM joint venture.

Skills and Qualifications of Particular Relevance to Cardinal Health

A former senior executive of IBM for over 15 years, Ms. Arnold’s significant experience in the areas of information technology and global leadership contributes to the Board’s discussions regarding our business and strategy. Given her extensive international business experience, including leadership of international commercial operations at IBM, Ms. Arnold provides valuable insights for our presence in international markets. She also brings to the Board more than 30 years of relevant experience in the areas of executive leadership and strategic planning.CARRIE S. COX

Carrie S. Cox

Executive Vice President and President of Global Pharmaceuticals, Schering-Plough Corporation (retired); Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Humacyte, Inc. (retired)

Director Qualification Highlights

  Healthcare

  Regulatory / Public Policy

  Board Leadership

  International

  Operations

Other Public Boards:

Texas Instruments Incorporated, a developer, manufacturer and marketer of semiconductors (since 2004); Celgene Corporation, a biopharmaceutical company (since 2009); electroCore, Inc., a commercial-stage bioelectronic medicine company (since June 2018); Array BioPharma Inc., a commercial-stage biopharmaceutical company (since August 2018)Background

Age 61

Director
since:2009

Board Committees:
Human Resources and Compensation, Ad Hoc

Independent Director

Biography

Ms. Cox servesserved as Chairman and Chief Executive ChairmanOfficer of Humacyte, Inc., a privately held, development stage company focused on regenerative medicine, where she previously served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer from 2010 to June 2018.2018 and as its Executive Chairman from 2018 to 2019. She was Executive Vice President and President of Global Pharmaceuticals at Schering-Plough Corporation, a multinational branded pharmaceutical manufacturer, from 2003 until its merger with Merck & Co. in 2009. She was Executive Vice President and President of the Global Prescription Businessbusiness of Pharmacia Corporation, a pharmaceutical and biotechnology company, from 1997 to 2003.

Qualifications

Skills and Qualifications of Particular Relevance to Cardinal Health

Through her roles as an executive of Schering-Plough, President of Pharmacia’s Global Prescription business and Chief Executive Officer of Humacyte and as a licensed pharmacist, Ms. Cox brings to the Board substantial expertise in healthcare, particularly the branded pharmaceutical and international aspects. She draws on this experience in discussions relating to Pharmaceutical segment strategy, healthcare compliance and the opioid epidemic, including in meetings of the Board’s Ad Hoc Committee. Ms. Cox worked in the global branded pharmaceutical industry for over 30 years, giving her relevant experience with large, multinational healthcare companies in the areas of regulatory compliance, global markets and manufacturing operations. She also brings to the Board and to her role chairing our Human Resources and Compensation Committee, valuable perspectives and insights from her service on the boards of directors of Selecta Biosciences and Texas Instruments and prior service on the Array BioPharma, Celgene including itsand electroCore boards. She currently serves as Chairman of the Board at Selecta Biosciences and previously served as Chairman of the Board at Array BioPharma and Lead Director at Texas Instruments. She also currently sits on Selecta Biosciences’ and Texas Instruments’ Compensation Committees and previously sat on Celgene’s Compensation and Development Committee, and Committee.

Other public company boards

Current

Selecta Biosciences, Inc.

Texas Instruments including its Compensation Committee, as well as her former service as Texas Instruments’ Lead Director.Incorporated

Withinlastfiveyears

Array BioPharma Inc.

Celgene Corporation

electroCore, Inc.

    

 

 

www.cardinalhealth.com

Age 70

Director since 2005

Board Committees:

Human Resources and Compensation, Ad Hoc

Independent Director

Cardinal Health|2018 Proxy Statement10

CALVIN DARDEN


Back to Contents

Calvin Darden

Senior Vice President of U.S. Operations of United Parcel Service, Inc. (retired)

Director Qualification Highlights

  Operations

  Distribution / Supply Chain

  Labor Relations

Other Public Boards:

Target Corporation, an operator of large-format general merchandise discount stores (since 2003); Aramark Corporation, a global provider of food, facilities and uniform services (since February 2018); Coca-Cola Enterprises, Inc., a marketer, manufacturer and distributor of nonalcoholic beverages in selected international markets (2004 – 2016)Background

Age 68

Director
since:2005

Board Committees:
Human Resources and Compensation, Ad Hoc

Independent Director

Biography

Mr. Darden was Senior Vice President of U.S. Operations of United Parcel Service, Inc. (“UPS”), an express carrier and package delivery company, from 2000 until 2005. During his 33-year career with UPS, he served in a number of senior leadership positions, including developing the corporate quality strategy for UPS and leading the business and logistics operations for its Pacific Region, the largest region of UPS at that time.

Qualifications

Skills and Qualifications of Particular Relevance to Cardinal Health

A former executive officer of UPS, Mr. Darden has expertise in supply chain networks and logistics that contributes to the Board’s understanding of these important aspects of our business. He has over 30 years of relevant experience in the areas of operations, distribution and supply chain, efficiency and quality control, human resources and labor relations. He also brings to the Board valuable perspectives and insights from his service on the boards of directors of TargetAramark and Aramark Corporation,Target, including their respective Compensation Committees, as well as his prior service on the board of directors of Coca-Cola Enterprises, including service on its Human Resources and Compensation Committee.

Other public company boards

Current

Aramark Corporation

Target Corporation

Withinlastfiveyears

Coca-Cola Enterprises, Inc.

    

 

Bruce

www.cardinalhealth.com

Cardinal Health | 2020 Proxy Statement    10


Back to Contents

Age 72

Director since 2009

Board Committees:

Nominating and

Governance, Ad Hoc

Independent Director

BRUCE L. DowneyDOWNEY

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Barr Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (retired); Partner of NewSpring Health Capital II, L.P.

Director Qualification Highlights

  Healthcare

  Regulatory / Public Policy

  Operations

  International

  Financial Expertise

  Board Leadership

Other Public Boards:

Momenta Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a biotechnology company (since 2009)Background

Age 70

Director
since:2009

Board Committees:
Audit, Ad Hoc

Independent Director

Biography

Mr. Downey was Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Barr Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a global generic pharmaceutical manufacturer, from 1994 to 2008.until 2008 when the company was acquired by Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. Mr. Downey has served on a part-time basis as a Partner of NewSpring Health Capital II, L.P., a venture capital firm, since 2009.

Skills Before his career at Barr Pharmaceuticals, Mr. Downey was a practicing attorney for 20 years, having worked in both private practice and Qualificationswith the U.S. Department of Particular Relevance to Cardinal HealthJustice.

Qualifications

Having spent 14 years as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Barr Pharmaceuticals, Mr. Downey brings to the Board substantial global experience in the areas of healthcare, regulatory compliance, manufacturing operations, finance, human resources and corporate governance. He offers valuable experience in the pharmaceutical and international aspects of our businesses.businesses, and he draws on his extensive legal and healthcare experience in chairing the Ad Hoc Committee and leading Board discussions related to opioid litigation and the opioid epidemic. Mr. Downey also brings to the Board valuable perspectives and insights from his service on the board of directors of Momenta Pharmaceuticals, including on its Audit Committee, and from his prior service as Chairman of Barr Pharmaceuticals’its independent chair, and former service on the board of directors. Before his career at Barrdirectors of Melinta Therapeutics.

Other public company boards

Current

Momenta Pharmaceuticals, Mr. Downey was a practicing attorney for 20 Inc.

Withinlastfiveyears having worked in both private practice and with the U.S. Department of Justice.

Melinta Therapeutics, Inc.

    

 

Age 63

Director since

September 2020

Board Committees:

Not yet determined

Independent Director

SHERI H. EDISON

Executive Vice President and General Counsel of Amcor plc

Background

Ms. Edison has served as Executive Vice President and General Counsel of Amcor plc, a global packaging company, since 2019. Prior to that, she served as Senior Vice President, Chief Legal Officer and Secretary of Bemis Company, Inc., also a global packaging company, from 2017 until Bemis was acquired by Amcor in 2019. Ms. Edison had also served as Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of Bemis from 2010 to 2016. She came to Bemis from Hill-Rom Holdings Inc., a global medical device company, where she had served as Senior Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer from 2007 to 2010 and Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary from 2004 to 2007. Ms. Edison began her career in private legal practice.

Qualifications

Having served in general counsel roles at publicly traded manufacturing companies in industries such as medical devices and packaging, Ms. Edison brings to the Board substantial experience in the areas of healthcare, legal, regulatory compliance, corporate governance and international markets. She also brings prior private legal practice experience, which further bolsters her understanding of a dynamic legal and regulatory environment. Ms. Edison also brings to the Board valuable perspectives and insights from her former service on the board of directors of AK Steel.

Other public company boards

Current

None

Withinlastfiveyears

AK Steel Holding Corporation

 

Cardinal Health|2018 Proxy StatementCardinal Health | 2020 Proxy Statement    11


Back to Contents

Patricia A. Hemingway Hall

Age 57

Director since

July 2020

Board Committees:

Not yet determined

Independent Director

DAVID C. EVANS

Chief Financial Officer of The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company and Battelle Memorial Institute (retired)

Background

Mr. Evans was Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Battelle Memorial Institute, a private research and development organization, from 2013 to 2018. Prior to that, he was Chief Financial Officer of The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company, a consumer lawn and garden products company, from 2006 until 2013 and Executive Vice President, Strategy and Business Development of Scotts from 2011 until 2013. In all, he spent 20 years in various managerial roles at Scotts. Most recently, Mr. Evans was Cardinal Health’s interim Chief Financial Officer from September 1, 2019 through May 25, 2020, after a transition role beginning July 29, 2019.

Qualifications

We elected Mr. Evans to the Board based on his deep financial background as Chief Financial Officer at Scotts Miracle-Gro and Battelle. Having spent 25 years in financial leadership positions with these organizations, Mr. Evans brings to the Board substantial experience in the areas of finance and accounting, investor relations, capital markets, strategy, tax and information technology. He also provides valuable insights in the areas of financial reporting and internal controls. Through his experience with Scotts Miracle-Gro, he provides a deep understanding of the financial aspects of, and capital deployment for, a publicly traded company. His service in an interim executive role at Cardinal Health brings company and industry knowledge to the Board. Mr. Evans also brings valuable perspectives and insights from his service on the board of directors of Scotts Miracle-Gro, including service on its Audit and Compensation and Organization Committees.

Other public company boards

Current

The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company

Withinlastfiveyears

None

 

Age 67

Director since 2013

Board Committees:

Human Resources and Compensation,

Nominating and

Governance

Independent Director

PATRICIA A. HEMINGWAY HALL

President and Chief Executive Officer of Health Care Service Corporation (retired)

Director Qualification Highlights

  Healthcare

  Regulatory / Public Policy

  Financial Expertise

  Information Technology

  Board Leadership

Other Public Boards:

ManpowerGroup Inc., a workforce solutions company (since 2011); Celgene Corporation, a biopharmaceutical company (since April 2018)Background

Age 65

Director
since:2013

Board Committees:
Audit, Nominating and Governance

Independent Director

Biography

Ms. Hemingway Hall served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Health Care Service Corporation, a mutual health insurer (“HCSC”), from 2008 until 2016. Previously, she held several executive leadership positions at HCSC, including President and Chief Operating Officer from 2007 to 2008 and Executive Vice President of Internal Operations from 2006 to 2007.

Qualifications

Skills and Qualifications of Particular Relevance to Cardinal Health

As retired President and Chief Executive Officer of HCSC, the largest customer-ownedmutual health insurer in the United States operating through several state Blue Cross and Blue Shield Plans, Ms. Hemingway Hall brings to the Board valuable experience regarding evolving healthcare payment models at a time of change and reform in the healthcare industry.industry’s regulatory environment. She has worked in the healthcare industry for over 30 years, first as a registered nurse and later in health insurance, and has relevant experience in the areas of healthcare reform, regulatory compliance, government relations, finance, information technology and human resources. SheMs. Hemingway Hall also brings to the Board and to her roles chairing our Nominating and Governance Committee and being a member of our Human Resources and Compensation Committee, valuable perspectives and insights from her service on the boards of directors of Halliburton and ManpowerGroup and Celgene, including their respective Audit Committees, as well as from chairingformer service on Celgene’s board of directors. She chairs ManpowerGroup’s Nominating and Governance Committee.Committee and sits on its Audit Committee and sits on Halliburton’s Compensation and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees.

Other public company boards

Current

Halliburton Company

ManpowerGroup Inc.

Withinlastfiveyears

Celgene Corporation

    

 

Akhil Johri

www.cardinalhealth.com

Cardinal Health | 2020 Proxy Statement    12


Back to Contents

Age 59

Director since 2018

Board Committees:

Audit, Surgical Gown

Recall Oversight

Independent Director

AKHIL JOHRI

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, United Technologies Corporation

Director Qualification Highlights

  Financial Expertise (Current CFO)

  International

  Acquisitions

  Information Technology

Other Public Boards:

None (retired)

Age 57

Director
since:February 2018

Board Committees:
Audit

Independent DirectorBackground

Biography

Mr. Johri has served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of United Technologies Corporation (“UTC”), a provider of high technology products and services to the building systems and aerospace industries, since 2015.from 2015 to November 2019 and retired from UTC in April 2020. From 2013 to 2014, he served as Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer of Pall Corporation, a global supplier of filtration, separations and purifications products, and from 2011 to 2013, he was Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer of UTC Propulsion & Aerospace Systems, which included Pratt & Whitney and UTC Aerospace Systems. Mr. Johri’s prior roles with UTC include leading investor relations, as well as holding senior financial roles with global business units, including 12 years in the Asia Pacific Region.

Qualifications

Skills and Qualifications of Particular Relevance to Cardinal Health

Having spent more than 25 years in financial leadership positions with UTC and Pall Corporation, Mr. Johri brings to the Board substantial experience in the areas of global finance and accounting, internationalinvestor relations, capital markets, mergers and acquisitions, tax, information technology and investor relations. Drawing upon his financial expertise, heinternational markets. He also provides valuable insights in the areas of financial reporting accounting,and internal controls and capital markets, as well as international tax and finance.controls. Through his experience in senior leadership roles with UTC’s businesses, he provides a deep understanding of the financial aspects of, and strategic implications impactingcapital deployment for, a publicly-tradedpublicly traded multinational company. Mr. Johri also brings to the Board valuable perspectives and insights from his service on Boeing’s board of directors, including service on its Audit Committee.

Other public company boards

Current

The Boeing Company

Withinlastfiveyears

None

    

 

www.cardinalhealth.com

Age 57

Director since 2018

Cardinal Health|2018 Proxy Statement12

MICHAEL C. KAUFMANN


Back to Contents

Michael C. Kaufmann

Chief Executive Officer, Cardinal Health, Inc.

Director Qualification Highlights

  Cardinal Health Operations

  Healthcare

  Financial Expertise (Former CFO)

  International

  Acquisitions

  Regulatory / Public Policy

Other Public Boards:

MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc., a distributor of metal working, maintenance, repair and operations products and services (since 2015)Background

Age 55

Director
since:January 2018

Biography

Mr. Kaufmann has served as Chief Executive Officer of Cardinal Health since January 2018. From November 2014 to December 2017, he served as our Chief Financial Officer and from August 2009 to November 2014, he served as our Chief Executive Officer Pharmaceutical Segment. Prior to that, he held a range of other senior leadership roles at Cardinal Health acrosshere spanning operations, sales and finance, including in both theour Pharmaceutical and Medical segments.

Qualifications

Skills and Qualifications of Particular Relevance to Cardinal Health

As our Chief Executive Officer and a 28-year veteran ofhaving spent almost 30 years at Cardinal Health, Mr. Kaufmann draws on his deep knowledge of our daily operations and our industry, customers, vendors,suppliers, employees and shareholders to provide the Board with a unique and very important perspective on the companyour business and a conduit for information from management. Prior leadership positions across the company provide him with expertise in the areas of healthcare, distribution operations, finance, international markets, mergers and acquisitions and regulatory compliance. He also provides the Board with an understanding of the strategic and financial implications of business, regulatory and economic factors impacting our company from having played an important role in key strategic initiatives, including the Red Oak Sourcing joint venture with CVS Health. In addition, Mr. Kaufmann brings relevant experience and perspectives to the Board from his service on the board of directors of MSC Industrial Direct, including service on its Audit and Compensation Committees.

Other public company boards

Current

MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc.

Withinlastfiveyears

None

    

 

Gregory

Cardinal Health | 2020 Proxy Statement    13


Back to Contents

Age 67

Director since 2007

Board Committees:

Nominating and

Governance, Ad Hoc,

Surgical Gown Recall

Oversight

Independent Chairman

of the Board

GREGORY B. KennyKENNY

President and Chief Executive Officer of General Cable Corporation (retired)

Director Qualification Highlights

  Board Leadership

  Operations

  International

  Financial Expertise

Other Public Boards:

Ingredion Incorporated, a corn refining and ingredient company (since 2005); AK Steel Holding Corporation, an integrated producer of flat-rolled, carbon and electrical stainless steels and tubular products (since 2016); General Cable Corporation (1997 – 2015)Background

Age 65

Director
since:2007

Board Committees:
Nominating and Governance, Ad Hoc

Independent Lead Director and Chairman of the Board, effective November 2018

Biography

Mr. Kenny served as President and Chief Executive Officer of General Cable Corporation, a global manufacturer of aluminum, copper and fiber-optic wire and cable products, from 2001 until 2015. Prior to that, he was President and Chief Operating Officer of General Cable from 1999 to 2001 and Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer from 1997 to 1999. Mr. Kenny previously served in executive level positions at Penn Central Corporation, where he was responsible for corporate business strategy, and in diplomatic service as a Foreign Service Officer with the U.S. Department of State.

Qualifications

Skills and Qualifications of Particular Relevance to Cardinal Health

Mr. Kenny who has been selected as our non-executive Chairman of the Board effective at the Annual Meeting,since November 2018 and was independent Lead Director from 2014 to 2018. He brings to the Board significant experience in the areas of Boardboard leadership, corporate governance, manufacturing operations, international markets, finance and human resources and corporate governance. He provides the Board with a deep understanding of the strategic and financial implications impacting a global business with manufacturing and distribution operations.resources. He also draws upon his Boardboard governance and leadership experience as Chairman ofpreviously chairing our Nominating and Governance Committee, the past Chairman of ourand Human Resources and Compensation CommitteeCommittees and chairing Ingredion’s board of directors and its Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee. Both in his current role as Chairman of the Board and Chairman of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee at Ingredion. As ourhis prior role as independent Lead Director, Mr. Kenny has promoted strong independent Board leadership during our recent senior leadership transitions and a robust, deliberative decision-making process among independent directors. He also meets with shareholders and represents their perspectives in Board discussions. Mr. Kenny also brings to the Board valuable perspectives and insights from his former service on AK Steel’s board of directors and his prior service on General Cable’s board of directors.

Other public company boards

Current

Ingredion Incorporated

Withinlastfiveyears

AK Steel Holding Corporation

    

 

Cardinal Health|2018 Proxy Statement13


Back to Contents

Nancy Killefer

Age 66

Director since 2015

Board Committees:

Human Resources and Compensation,

Surgical Gown Recall

Oversight

Independent Director

NANCY KILLEFER

Senior Partner, Public Sector Practice, McKinsey & Company, Inc. (retired)

Director Qualification Highlights

  Strategic Planning

  Healthcare

  Regulatory / Public Policy

  Financial Expertise

  Board Leadership

Other Public Boards:

Avon Products, Inc., a global manufacturer and marketer of beauty products (since 2013); Computer Sciences Corporation, a global provider of information technology services (2013 – 2015); The Advisory Board Company, a provider of software and solutions to the healthcare and education industries (2013 – 2017); CSRA, Inc., a provider of information technology services to the U.S. federal government (2015 – April 2018)Background

Age 64

Director
since:2015

Board Committees:
Human Resources and Compensation

Independent Director

Biography

Ms. Killefer served as Senior Partner of McKinsey & Company, Inc., a global management consulting firm, from 1992 until 2013. She joined McKinsey in 1979 and held a number of key leadership roles, including serving as a member of the firm’s governing board. Ms. Killefer founded McKinsey’s Public Sector Practice in 2007 and served as its managing partner until her retirement. She also served as Assistant Secretary for Management, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer for the U.S. Department of Treasury from 1997 to 2000.

Qualifications

Skills and Qualifications of Particular Relevance to Cardinal Health

Having served in key leadership positions in both the public and private sectors and provided strategic counsel to healthcare and consumer-based companies during her 30 years with McKinsey, Ms. Killefer brings to the Board substantial experience in the areas of strategic planning, including healthcare strategy, and marketing and brand-building. Her extensive experience as managing partner of McKinsey’s Public Sector Practice and as a chief financial officer of a government agency provides valuable insights in the areas of government relations, public policy and finance. Ms. Killefer also brings to the Board valuable perspectives and insights from her service on the board of directors of Facebook (including chairing its Privacy Committee), Natura (including service on its Organization and People Committee), and Taubman Centers, and her prior service on the boards of directors of Avon Products, CSRA, Inc. (including service as its independent chair), Computer Sciences Corporation and The Advisory Board.

Other public company boards

Current

Facebook, Inc.

Natura &Co Holding S.A.

Taubman Centers, Inc.

Withinlastfiveyears

Avon Products, Inc.

CSRA, Inc.

Computer Sciences Corporation

The Advisory Board Company

www.cardinalhealth.com

Cardinal Health | 2020 Proxy Statement    14


Back to Contents

Age 74

Director since 2018

(previously 1996 –

2009)

Board Committees:

Audit

Independent Director

J. MICHAEL LOSH

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of General Motors Corporation (retired)

Background

Mr. Losh served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of General Motors Corporation, a global automobile manufacturer, from 1994 to 2000. He spent 36 years in various capacities with General Motors. Mr. Losh also previously served as our interim Chief Financial Officer from July 2004 to May 2005 and was a director of Cardinal Health from 1996 through our spin-off of CareFusion Corporation in 2009.

Qualifications

We elected Mr. Losh to the Board in December 2018 due to his immediate ability to chair our Audit Committee based on his financial expertise and prior service on our Board. He brings a deep financial background, industry knowledge from his prior service on our and CareFusion’s boards, and extensive public company board experience in a variety of industries. He is former Chief Financial Officer of General Motors, chairs Aon’s Audit Committee and previously chaired the Audit Committees at Prologis and other public companies. He also currently chairs Masco’s board of directors.

Other public company boards

Current

Amesite Inc.

Aon plc

Masco Corporation

Withinlastfiveyears

H.B. Fuller Corporation

Prologis, Inc.

Age 64

Director since 2019

Board Committees:

Audit

Independent Director

DEAN A. SCARBOROUGH

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Avery Dennison Corporation (retired)

Background

Mr. Scarborough served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Avery Dennison Corporation, a packaging and labeling solutions company, from 2014 to 2016. Prior to that, he served as Avery Dennison’s Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer from 2010 to 2014 and as its President and Chief Executive Officer from 2005 to 2010. After stepping down as Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Scarborough remained Chairman of the Board through April 2019. Having joined Avery Dennison in 1983, Mr. Scarborough served in a series of leadership roles both in the United States and abroad until he was appointed Chief Operating Officer in 2000 and later Chief Executive Officer.

Qualifications

Having served as Avery Dennison’s Chief Executive Officer for 11 years, Mr. Scarborough brings to the Board substantial experience in manufacturing and distribution operations. As a former public company chief executive officer, he has relevant experience in finance, human resources and corporate governance. He also brings a global business and manufacturing perspective, having led Avery Dennison’s Label and Packaging Materials Europe business while he was based in the Netherlands. Mr. Scarborough also brings to the Board valuable perspectives and insights from his service on the board of directors of Graphic Packaging Holding Company, including service on its Audit Committee, and prior service on Mattel, Inc.’s board of directors.

Other public company boards

Current

Graphic Packaging Holding Company

Withinlastfiveyears

Avery Dennison Corporation

Mattel, Inc.

Cardinal Health | 2020 Proxy Statement    15


Back to Contents

Age 64

Director since 2019

Board Committees:

Audit, Surgical Gown

Recall Oversight

Independent Director

JOHN H. WEILAND

President and Chief Operating Officer, C. R. Bard, Inc. (retired)

Background

Mr. Weiland served as President and Chief Operating Officer of medical device company C. R. Bard, Inc. from 2003 until 2017, when Bard was acquired by Becton, Dickinson and Company. He also served on Bard’s board of directors from 2005 to 2017, becoming Vice Chairman of the Board in 2016. Mr. Weiland joined Bard in 1996 and held the position of Group President, with global responsibility for several Bard divisions and its worldwide manufacturing operations prior to becoming President and Chief Operating Officer. Prior to Bard, he held senior management positions at Dentsply International, American Hospital Supply, Baxter Healthcare and Pharmacia AB.

Qualifications

Mr. Weiland brings over 40 years of healthcare industry experience to the Board, including executive leadership at a medical device company and significant international business experience. He has relevant experience in regulatory compliance, global markets and manufacturing operations. Mr. Weiland also brings to the Board valuable perspectives and insights from his service on the board of directors of Celgene Corporation, including service on its Audit Committee, and prior service on West Pharmaceutical Services’ board of directors, including chairing its Compensation and Management Development Committee, The Advisory Board and CSRA,Finance Committees.

Other public company boards

Current

None

Withinlastfiveyears

Celgene Corporation

C. R. Bard, Inc., including as its independent Chair.

West Pharmaceutical Services, Inc.

    

 

Director Skills Matrix

Our director nominees possess relevant experience, skills and qualificationsexperience that contribute to a well-functioning Board that effectively oversees the company’sour strategy and management.

Director Nominee QualificationsSkills and

Experience

Arnold

Cox

Darden

Downey

 

Edison

Evans

Hemingway

Hall

Johri

Kaufmann

Kenny

Killefer

Losh

Scarborough

Weiland

Board leadership as a board chair, lead director or committee chair equips directors to lead our Board and its Committees

 

 

 

Financial expertise as a finance executive or CEO brings valuable experience to the Board and our management team

 

 

 

Healthcare expertise as a leader of a healthcare company or a consulting firm with a healthcare practice provides industry experience

 

 

 

 

Operations experience increases the Board’s understanding of our distribution and manufacturing operations

 

 

 

Regulatory/legal/public policy experience helps managementthe Board assess and respond to an evolving business and healthcare regulatory environment

 

 

 

 

International experience brings critical insights into the opportunities and risks of our international businesses

 

 

 

Information technology experience provides critical insights intocontributes to the Board’s understanding of the information technology aspects of our business

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

www.cardinalhealth.com

Cardinal Health|20182020 Proxy Statement14    16


Back to Contents

Our Board’s Composition and Structure

Our Board Leadership Structure

Our Board is currently led by an Executive Chairman of the Board and an independent Lead Director with a separate Chief Executive Officer. The Board has selected Mr. Kenny to servehas served as the independent, non-executive Chairman of the Board effective at the Annual Meetingsince November 2018, when our Executive Chairman retires.

Our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that the Board is responsible for selectingwe separated the Chairman of the Board and the Chief Executive Officer. While historically, these roles have been combined, the Board decidedOfficer roles. Prior to separate the roles when it appointed Mr. Kaufmann as Chief Executive Officer. In making this change, the Board considered a wide range of factors, including current market practice and the views of shareholders, and selected the leadership structure that, the Board determined most appropriate at the present time. The Nominating and Governance Committee periodically reviews and assesses the Board’s leadership structure.

Mr. Kenny hashe served as independent Lead Director (elected annually by the independent directors) since November 2014.

In that role, headdition to serving as a liaison between the Board and management, key responsibilities of the Chairman include:

works closely with the Executive Chairmancalling meetings of the Board and independent directors;

setting the agenda for Board meetings in consultation with the other directors, the Chief Executive Officer, in developingand the corporate secretary;

reviewing Board meeting schedules to ensure that there is sufficient time for discussion of all agenda items;

reviewing and approving Board meeting materials forbefore circulation and providing guidance to management on meeting presentations;

chairing Board meetings, and approvesincluding the agenda and information sent toexecutive sessions of the Board,independent directors;

consultsparticipating in the annual Chief Executive Officer performance evaluation;

conferring with and advises the Executive Chairman of the Board and the Chief Executive Officer on matters arising betweenof importance that may require Board meetings,action or oversight;

setsas a member of the agenda forNominating and leads all executive sessions of independent directors,Governance Committee, evaluating potential director candidates, assisting with director recruitment, recommending committee chairs and membership, and recommending updates to the company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines; and

holdsholding governance discussions with large investorsinvestors.

The Board considered a wide range of factors in determining that its current leadership structure is the most appropriate arrangement at the present time, including current market practice and attends a major healthcare investor conference with management, at which he also meets with manythe views of our investors,shareholders. The Nominating and

performs Governance Committee periodically reviews, assesses and makes recommendations to the other duties set forth in our Corporate Governance Guidelines.Board regarding the Board’s leadership structure.

Board Diversity

Our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that the Board should be diverse, engaged and independent. In identifying and evaluating candidates for the Board, the Nominating and Governance Committee considers the diversity of the Board, including diversity of skills, experience and backgrounds, as well as ethnic and gender diversity. We believe that our Board nominees appropriately reflect a diversityan appropriate mix of skills, of professional, gender, ethnicexperience and personal backgrounds and of experience. We also believe that they strike the right balance of longer serving and newer directors.

 

*

Does not include Mr. Losh’s prior service on our Board from 1996 to 2009.

 

Cardinal Health|2018 Proxy Statement15

Cardinal Health | 2020 Proxy Statement    17


Back to Contents

How We Identify, Add and On-Board New Directors

The Nominating and Governance Committee is responsible for identifying, reviewing and recommending director candidates, for Board membership. Ourand our Board is responsible for selecting candidates for election as directors.

While the process may vary dependingdirectors based on the director candidate, a search firm identified Mr. Johri and the Nominating and Governance CommitteeCommittee’s recommendations.

Ms. Hemingway Hall and Mr. Kenny recommended him usingMr. Evans, and Mr. Kenny recommended Ms. Edison, as potential candidates for consideration by the following approach:

Upon joiningNominating and Governance Committee. Mr. Evans has previous public company chief financial officer experience and served as our interim Chief Financial Officer for nine months through May 2020. Ms. Edison has extensive experience as a senior legal executive at public companies in the Board, Mr. Johri participatedmedical device and packaging industries. Both have previous public company board experience and are independent directors.

New directors typically participate in a comprehensive, full-day director orientation program, which includedincludes meetings with senior management. This orientation program helps new directors become familiar with our businessesbusiness and strategy, significant financial matters, ethics and compliance program, corporate governance practices and risk management and human resources and investor relations.functions.

Director Attendance

The Board held nine meetings during fiscal 2018.2020. Each director attended 75% or more of the meetings of the Board and Board committees on which he or she served during the fiscal year. Average director attendance at all Board and Board committee meetings was 96%.

TenAll of our 11 directors at the time attended the 20172019 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. Absent unusual circumstances, each director is expected to attend the Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

Board Committees

The Board has an Audit Committee, a Nominating and Governance Committee and a Human Resources and Compensation Committee (the “Compensation Committee”). Each member of these committees is independent under our Corporate Governance Guidelines and under applicable committee independence rules.

The charter for each of these committees is available on our website at www.cardinalhealth.com under “About Us — Corporate — Investor Relations — Corporate Governance — Board Committees and Charters.” This information also is available in print (free of charge) to any shareholder who requests it from our Investor Relations department.

In February 2018, theThe Board formedalso has an Ad Hoc Committee of independent directors formed in 2018 to assist the Board in its oversight of opioid-related issues.

www.cardinalhealth.com

Cardinal Health|2018 Proxy Statement16


Backissues and a Surgical Gown Recall Oversight Committee of independent directors formed in 2020 to Contentsassist the Board in oversight of a surgical gown recall.

Audit Committee

Members:(1)

 

Clayton M. JonesJ. Michael Losh (Chair)

Colleen F. Arnold(1)

Akhil Johri

Dean A. Scarborough(2)

Bruce L. Downey

Patricia A. Hemingway Hall

Akhil JohriJohn H. Weiland(3)(2)

 

Meetingsinfiscal2018: 2020: 76

 

The Audit Committee’s primary duties are to:

oversee the integrity of our financial statements, including reviewing annual and quarterly financial statements and earnings releases and the effectiveness of our internal and disclosure controls;

appoint the independent auditor and oversee its qualifications, independence and performance, including pre-approving all services by the independent auditor;

review our internal audit plan and oversee our internal audit department;

approve the appointment of our Chief Legal and Compliance Officer and oversee our ethics and compliance program and our compliance with applicable legal and quality and regulatory requirements; and

oversee our major financial and information technology risk exposures and our process for assessing and managing risk through our enterprise risk management program.

The Board has determined that each member of the Audit CommitteeMessrs. Johri, Losh and Scarborough is an “audit committee financial expert” for purposes of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) rules.

(1)

Ms. Arnold has decided not to stand for re-election at the Annual Meeting and her term will expire at that time.

(2)

Messrs. Scarborough and Weiland became members of the Audit Committee in September 2019.

www.cardinalhealth.com

Cardinal Health | 2020 Proxy Statement    18


Back to Contents

Nominating and Governance Committee

Members:

 

Gregory B. Kenny (Chair)

Colleen F. Arnold

Patricia A. Hemingway Hall (Chair)

Bruce L. Downey

Gregory B. Kenny

 

Meetings in fiscal 2018:2020: 4

The Nominating and Governance Committee’s primary duties are to:

identify, review and recommend candidates for the Board, including recommending criteria to the Board for potential Board candidates and assessing the qualifications, attributes, skills, contributions and independence of individual directors and director candidates;

oversee the Board’s succession planning;

make recommendations to the Board concerning the structure, composition and functions of the Board and its committees;

advise the Board onCommittees, including Board leadership and leadership structure;

review our corporateCorporate Governance Guidelines and governance guidelines and practices and recommend changes;

oversee our environmental sustainability and other corporate citizenship activities, including our policies and practices regarding political and lobbying activities and expenditures; and

conduct the annual Board evaluation and oversee the process for the evaluation of each director; and

oversee our policies and practices regarding political expenditures.director.


(1) 

David J. Anderson served on the Audit Committee from September 2017, when he was re-appointed to the committee after his employment with Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“Alexion”) ended, until he resigned from the Board in September 2018.

(2) 

Mr. Jones has decided not to stand for re-election at the Annual Meeting and his term will expire at that time.

(3) 

Mr. Johri was appointed to the Audit Committee in February 2018.

 

Cardinal Health|2018 Proxy Statement17


Back to Contents

Human Resources and Compensation Committee

Members:

 

David P. King (Chair)(1)

Carrie S. Cox (Chair)

Calvin Darden

Patricia A. Hemingway Hall

Nancy Killefer

 

Meetings in fiscal 2018:2020: 87

The Compensation Committee’s primary duties are to:

approve compensation for the Chief Executive Officer, establish relevant performance goals and evaluate his performance;

approve compensation for our other executive officers and oversee their evaluations;

make recommendations to the Board with respect to the adoption of equity and incentive compensation plans and topolicies, administer such plans;plans and policies and determine whether to recoup compensation;

review our non-management directors’ compensation program and recommend changes to the Board;

oversee the management succession process for the Chief Executive Officer and senior executives;

oversee and advise the Board about human capital management strategies and policies, including with respect to attracting, developing, retaining and motivating management and employees, workplace diversity and inclusion initiatives and progress;progress, employee relations and workplace safety and culture;

oversee and assess material risks related to compensation arrangements; and

assess the independence of Compensation Committee’s consultant and evaluate its performance.

The Compensation Discussion and Analysis, which begins on page 27,31, discusses how the Compensation Committee makes compensation-related decisions regarding our named executive officers.

Cardinal Health | 2020 Proxy Statement    19


Back to Contents

Ad Hoc Committee

Members:

 

Bruce L. Downey (Chair)

Carrie S. Cox

Calvin Darden

Gregory B. Kenny

 

Meetings fromin Februaryfiscal 2018

formationthroughSeptember

2018:2020: 79

The Ad Hoc Committee assists the Board in its oversight of Cardinal Health’sthe company’s response to the nationwide problem of prescription opioid abuse by providingabuse. It receives and discusses regular reports from management and the company’s external advisors on our initiatives and other developments and provides management input and direction. It also provides advice, regular reports and recommendations to the Board. During its meetings, theThe Ad Hoc Committee receives updates regarding, among other things:

progress of the global settlement framework designed to resolve all pending and future opioid lawsuits by states and political subdivisions;

investigations and litigation;

anti-diversion and controlled substance reporting programs;

risks posed to the company by the opioid epidemic and related litigation from a legal, financial and reputational perspective;

changes in the regulatory and legislative environment;

the company’s support of solutions to help address the opioid epidemic; and

engagement with shareholders, employees and other key stakeholders.

Surgical Gown Recall Oversight Committee

Members:

John H. Weiland (Chair)

Akhil Johri

Gregory B. Kenny

Nancy Killefer

Meetingsinfiscal2020:7

The Surgical Gown Recall Oversight Committee assists the Board in overseeing and engaging with management regarding the company’s surgical gown recall announced in January 2020.(1) It receives and discusses reports from management and the company’s external advisors (as appropriate) and provides management input and direction. For example,It also provides advice, reports and recommendations to the Ad HocBoard. Since its formation, the Surgical Gown Recall Oversight Committee receives updates regarding:has discussed, among other things:

anti-diversionthe status of the recall and controlled substance monitoring programs;field actions;

potential solutions to alleviateregulatory aspects of the opioid epidemic;recall and field actions;

risks posed by the opioid epidemic to Cardinal Health from a legal, financialimpact on customers and reputational perspective;the business;

litigation, including the Multi-District Litigation before Judge Polster in Ohioour quality assurance processes and related settlement discussions;

the investigations and negotiations led by the State Attorneys General “Multistate” Group;

changes in the regulatory and legislative environment;

Cardinal Health’s Opioid Action Program;business practices; and

corporate governancemedia and engagement with key stakeholder groups, including shareholders, customers, employees and others.reputational impacts.


(1)

Mr. King has decidedAs disclosed in our fiscal 2020 Form 10-K, in January 2020, we issued a voluntary recall for 9.1 million AAMI Level 3 surgical gowns and two voluntary field actions (a recall of some packs and a corrective action allowing overlabeling of other packs) for 2.9 million Presource Procedure Packs containing affected gowns. These recalls were necessary because we discovered in December 2019 that one of our FDA registered suppliers in China had shifted production of some gowns to unapproved sites with uncontrolled manufacturing environments. Because of this, we could not to stand for re-election atassure sterility of the Annual Meeting and his term will expire at that time.gowns. In connection with these recalls, we recorded total charges of $85 million during fiscal 2020.

 

www.cardinalhealth.com

Cardinal Health|20182020 Proxy Statement18    20


Back to Contents

Our Board’s Primary Role and Responsibilities and Processes

Our Board’s Primary Role and Responsibilities

Our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that our Board serves as the representative of, and acts on behalf of, all the shareholders of Cardinal Health. In that regard, some primary functions of the Board include:

reviewing, evaluating and, where appropriate, approving the company’sour major business strategies, capital deployment and long-term plans and reviewing itsour performance;

planning for and approving management succession; and

overseeing the company’sour policies and procedures for assessing and managing compliance and risk.

How ourOur Board Oversees Our Performance, Strategy and Capital Deployment

The Board receives regular updates on company performance and regularly discusses our strategy in light of our performance,considering the competitive environment, developments in the rapidly changing healthcare industry, and the global business and economic environment. The Board reviews and approves capital deployment, including dividends, financing and share repurchase plans, and significant acquisitions and divestitures.

At least annually, the Board conducts a dedicated strategy session with in-depth discussions of the healthcareour industry, specific businesses and new business opportunities. These sessions include external speakers, such as business partners and advisors, as well as off-site visits to company facilities and customer locations. At these sessions, the Board discusses risks related to our strategies, including thoserisks resulting from possible competitor, customeractions by competitors, disrupters, customers and supplier actions, the changing healthcare industry and new technologies.suppliers. The Board also discussesconsiders various elements of strategy at each regular quarterly meeting. The collective backgrounds, skills and experiences of our directors, including broad healthcareindustry experience, contribute to robust discussions of strategy and the related risks.

The following are some recent examples of our Board’s oversight and engagement in these areas:

To establish a foundation for future growth, the Board has worked with managementsupported our goal to initiatedeploy capital in a comprehensive review of our business focused on our portfolio, cost structurebalanced and capital deployment. The Board discussed the business review at four meetings during fiscal 2018 and fiscal 2019 to date. In May 2018, the Board designated three independent directors to discuss the progress of this review with senior management between Board meetings.

At each in-person meeting during fiscal 2018, the Board reviewed the performance of, and management’s plans to address, the Cordis business and received an update on integration of the recently-acquired Patient Recovery business.

The Board reviewed and discussed strategic alternatives for our China distribution business at seven meetings during fiscal 2017 and 2018, approving the sale of the business in November 2017.

The Board reviewed and discussed strategic alternatives for our naviHealth business at three meetings later in fiscal 2018. In June 2018, the Board approved the sale of our ownership interestdisciplined manner that prioritizes reinvesting in the business, formaintaining a strong balance sheet, and returning cash proceedsto shareholders through dividends. Reinvestment in the business through capital expenditures remains a critical priority. Another priority is maintaining a strong balance sheet through our focus on our credit rating and the corresponding metrics. We paid down $1.4 billion in debt during fiscal 2020. Our board also approved a 44% interest1% increase in a new partnershipour dividend during fiscal 2020.

Engagement on COVID-19

During fiscal 2020, the Board was highly engaged with Clayton, Dubilier & Rice that now owns naviHealth.the Chief Executive Officer and other management about the impact of COVID-19 and the company’s response and plans. Management held regular informational calls with Board members throughout the spring and summer covering employees and operations, financial impact, product supply, media engagement, and related legal and regulatory matters. Management also is engaged with the Board on identifying and addressing strategic risks and opportunities arising out of COVID-19. During the pandemic, we adjusted our planned in-person Board meetings to hold them virtually to ensure continued effective functioning of the Board.

How ourOur Board Engages in Management Succession

The Compensation Committee and the Board isare actively engaged in our talent management program. The Compensation Committee oversees the process for succession planning for the Chief Executive Officer and other senior executives, and management provides an organizational update at each quarterly Compensation Committee meeting.

The full Board holds a formal succession planning and talent review session annually, which includes succession planning for the Chief Executive Officer and other senior executives. These sessions include identification and development of internal candidates and take into account desired leadership skills and key capabilities and experience in light ofconsidering our current and evolving business and strategic direction.

Directors interact with our leaders through Board presentations and discussions, as well as through informal events and interactions throughout the year in small group and planned one-on-one sessions.

As a result of our succession planning process, effective January 1, 2018, the Board appointed Mr. Kaufmann as Chief Executive Officer and Mr. Gomez as Chief Financial Officer. Mr. Kaufmann succeeded Mr. Barrett, who had served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer for nine years. The Board considered both Mr. Kaufmann’s deep understanding of the company and healthcare industry and his strong performance in senior leadership roles in selecting him as Cardinal Health’s next Chief Executive Officer.

Mr. Kaufmann is a 28-year veteran of Cardinal Health who has held a range of senior leadership roles in both segments. He was most recently Chief Financial Officer and also oversaw Global Sourcing.

Prior to the Chief Financial Officer role, Mr. Kaufmann was Chief Executive Officer — Pharmaceutical Segment from 2008 to 2014. In that role, he was instrumental in the negotiation of the company’s Red Oak Sourcing joint venture with CVS Health.

Over his 12-year career with Cardinal Health, Mr. Gomez has served as Chief Financial Officer for both segments, as well as Treasurer and Corporate Controller.

The Board maintains an emergency succession plan, as well as a long-term succession plan for the position of Chief Executive Officer.

During fiscal 2020, our succession planning process helped Mr. Kaufmann complete his executive leadership team with Jason Hollar, an experienced new hire for the Chief Financial Officer role. Mr. Hollar joined us from automotive products company Tenneco Inc. and his experience spans multiple industries and geographies. In addition to serving as Chief Financial Officer of Tenneco and Sears Holding Corporation before that, Mr. Hollar has held senior finance roles at other large multinational companies.

Cardinal Health|2018 Proxy Statement19

Cardinal Health | 2020 Proxy Statement    21


Back to Contents

How ourOur Board Oversees Risk

A summary of the allocation of general risk oversight functions among management, the Board and its Committees is as follows:

Management has day-to-day responsibility for assessing and managing risks, and the Board is responsible for risk oversight. Management has developed and administers an enterprise risk management process,program, which the Audit Committee oversees. Through this process, management identifies and prioritizes enterprise risks and develops systems to assess, monitor and mitigate those risks. Management reviews and discusses with the Board significant risks identified through this process.program.

The Audit Committee is responsible for discussing with management major financial risk exposures, our ethics and compliance program and compliance with legal and quality and regulatory requirements. The Board and Audit Committee receive regular updates on our ethics and compliance and cybersecurity programs.

In connection with its risk oversight role, the Audit Committee meets regularly with representatives from our independent auditor and with our Chief Financial Officer, Chief Legal and Compliance Officer and the head of our internal audit function. See also pages 6 and 7 addressing

The Ad Hoc Committee assists the Board in its oversight of our response to the opioid crisis.epidemic. The Ad Hoc Committee receives updates and assesses the implications for Cardinal Health of, among other things, the risks posed by the opioid epidemic and related litigation from a legal, financial and reputational perspective.

The Surgical Gown Recall Oversight Committee assists the Board in its oversight of the company’s surgical gown recall announced in January 2020 and related activities and risks.

COVID-19 Risks

Since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, management has kept the Board apprised of its efforts to assess strategic risks and opportunities arising from structural shifts in the industry resulting from COVID-19. Management has developed and is implementing plans in connection with this assessment and regularly updates the Board on their progress.

Our Ethics and Compliance Program

Our Board has adopted written Standards of Business Conduct that outline our corporate values and standards of integrity and behavior. The Standards of Business Conduct are designed to foster a culture of integrity, drive compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, and protect and promote the reputation of our company. The full text of the Standards of Business ConductConduct is posted on our website at www.cardinalhealth.com under “About Us — Who we are — Ethics and Compliance.” This information also is available in print (free of charge) to any shareholder who requests it from our Investor Relations department.

Our Chief Legal and Compliance Officer has the responsibility to implement and maintain an effective ethics and compliance program. HeShe provides quarterly updates on our ethics and compliance program to the Audit Committee and an update to the full Board at least once a year, or more frequently as needed. HeShe reports to the Chairman of the Audit Committee and to the Chief Executive Officer and meets in separate executive sessionssession quarterly with the Audit Committee.

The Board’s Role in Oversight of Corporate Citizenship

The Nominating and Governance Committee is charged with overseeing our environmental sustainability and other corporate citizenship activities, including our policies and practices regarding political and lobbying activities and expenditures. Our corporate citizenship reports are available on our website at www.cardinalhealth.com under “About Us — Corporate Citizenship.”

www.cardinalhealth.com

Cardinal Health | 2020 Proxy Statement    22


Back to Contents

Corporate Citizenship during Fiscal 2020

In the past year, management formally chartered a cross-functional ESG Steering Committee to meet regularly to consider environmental, social and governance (“ESG”) issues. We also worked with an external partner to help us identify ESG priorities that are most relevant to our company and our stakeholders and identified the following seven ESG priorities: response to the opioid crisis; ethics and compliance; product quality and safety; human capital management; data privacy and security; environmental emissions and impact; and supply chain management. Each is discussed in our 2019 Corporate Citizenship Report.

Focus on Diversity and Inclusion

As we emphasized in the 2019 Corporate Citizenship Report, diversity and inclusion — in our workplaces and in our communities — is an important priority to us. By respecting and appreciating diversity of thought, experience and background, we are becoming more innovative, increasing employee engagement and improving customer and shareholder value. Managers are required to seek out a slate of candidates that includes women and minorities for any job or promotion. Four of eight leaders reporting to our Chief Executive Officer are women and one is an African American male. Women comprise 41% of our executive management and ethnically diverse persons comprise 18%.

We required unconscious bias training of every incentive eligible leader during fiscal 2020 and, as discussed in Compensation Discussion and Analysis on page 34, we introduced a corporate culture goal for our fiscal 2020 annual cash incentive program for completion of unconscious bias training.

We have an internal D&I Steering Council of senior business leaders charged with helping to lead internal conversations about diversity and inclusion. And last year, our Chief Executive Officer held our first ever D&I Town Hall with a panel of senior leaders.

More recently, our Chief Executive Officer formed a cabinet of African American and Black leaders within the company to help educate our senior leaders on racial equity issues and advise on actions we can take.

The Board’s Role in Oversight of Corporate Culture

The Board continues to assess and monitor corporate culture at Cardinal Health and how it fosters our business strategies. To inform the Board about human capital and cultural health, we have developed and annually share with the Board a cross-functional culture scorecard that includes employee engagement survey data, employee retention and turnover data, diverse employee and management representation, audit and accounting findings, employee cybersecurity awareness results and employee health and safety data.

Our Path Forward

As part of our broader strategic and financial plans, we began fiscal 2020 by launching “Our Path Forward” (see graphic below), which outlines both the plans and initiatives we have underway to advance our objectives and the key competitive advantages and values that will be vital to our success.

As discussed in Compensation Discussion and Analysis beginning on page 34, the Compensation Committee added new culture goals to our annual cash incentive and PSU grants during fiscal 2020 to align with these important strategic initiatives. The culture goals for the annual incentive program focused on performance management, change management and diversity and inclusion, while the culture goal for the PSUs focused on leadership score improvement from our employee engagement survey. We plan to continue to develop these culture goals.

Management Behaviors

For the fiscal 2020 performance management process, we introduced new management “behaviors” in line with Our Path Forward. They are:

invites curiosity (explores possibilities for the future);

inspires commitment (pursues results with passion);

builds partnerships (seeks connections for the greater good); and

develops self and others (inspires others to grow to our full potential).

Cardinal Health | 2020 Proxy Statement    23


Back to Contents

Our Board Evaluation Process

Each year, our Board conducts a rigorous self-evaluation process, which includes individual director evaluations. This process is overseen by the Nominating and Governance Committee, led by our independent Lead DirectorNominating and Governance Committee Chair, and conducted by an outside facilitator with corporate governance experience. The outside facilitator interviews each director to obtain anonymous feedback regarding the Board’sBoard performance and effectiveness as well asand reviews the feedback on each director.during an executive session of the Board. This feedback which is compiled anonymously, helps the Board identify follow-up items and provide feedback to management.

The Board evaluation process includes an assessment of both Board process and substance, including:

the Board’s effectiveness, structure, composition, succession and culture;

the quality of Board discussions;

the Board’s performance in oversight of business performance, strategy, succession planning, risk management, ethics and compliance and other key areas; and

agenda topics for future meetings.

The outside facilitator also compilesobtains feedback regarding each individual director, which is provided to eachthe director in an individual discussion. The Board believes that this annual evaluation process supports its effectiveness and continuous improvement.

In addition to the full Board’s evaluation process, each of the Audit, Compensation and Nominating and Governance Committees annually review their charters and conduct their own Committee self-evaluation.

Director Independence

The Board has established director independence standards based on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) rules. These standards can be found in our Corporate Governance Guidelines on our website at www.cardinalhealth.com under “About Us — Corporate — Investor Relations — Corporate Governance — Corporate Governance Documents.” These standards address, among other things, employment and compensation relationships, relationships with our auditor and customer and business relationships.

The Board assesses director independence at least annually, based on the recommendations of the Nominating and Governance Committee. The Board has determined that each of Messrs. Darden, Downey, Jones,Evans, Johri, Kenny and King, and each of Mses. Arnold, Cox, Hemingway Hall and Killefer, is independent and that Mr. Anderson, who resigned from the Board in September 2018, was independent after his employment with Alexion ended in August 2017.

In determining that Mr. King is independent, the Nominating and Governance Committee considered that he is Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of LabCorp. We sell medical and laboratory products to LabCorp in the ordinary course of business. LabCorp’s payments to us were less than 1% of our, and less than 2% of LabCorp’s, revenue for each of the last three years.

 

www.cardinalhealth.com

Cardinal Health|20182020 Proxy Statement20    24


Back to Contents

Kenny, Losh, Scarborough and Weiland, and each of Mses. Arnold, Cox, Edison, Hemingway Hall and Killefer, is independent.

In reaching the determination that Mr. Evans is independent, the Board considered that, following the unexpected departure of our Chief Financial Officer early in fiscal 2020, Mr. Evans was hired to serve as interim Chief Financial Officer for less than a year while we conducted a search for a permanent Chief Financial Officer, and he received fixed cash compensation in that interim role.

Shareholder Engagement

It has been our long-standing practice to actively engage with our shareholders throughout the year so that management and the Board can better understand shareholder perspectives on governance, executive compensation and other topics. We strive for a collaborative approach to shareholder engagement and value the variety of shareholders’ perspectives. Throughout his tenure, our independent Lead Director, Mr. Kenny, has participated in outreach discussions with shareholders and also has attended and met with investors during a leading healthcare conference. He provides shareholder feedback gathered through these discussions to the Board.

During fiscal 2018,the summer of 2020, we again engaged with governance professionals from our largest shareholders collectively representing approximately 50% of our outstanding shares. We also held constructive discussions with representatives of Investors for Opioid Accountability.shareholders. Our engagement discussions covered, a number ofamong other topics, including our Board’s leadership, composition and governance practices andresponse to the Board’s oversight of strategy and risk andCOVID-19 pandemic, Board oversight of our response to the opioid crisis.epidemic, including the global settlement framework and related litigation, the surgical gown recall, Board composition and refreshment, and our Chief Financial Officer transition. We also have continued to hold constructive discussions with members of the Investors for Opioid and Pharmaceutical Accountability coalition.

AnA general overview of our annual engagement process is below.

 

After considering feedback from shareholders in recent years, we have:have taken the following actions:

limited director service on other public company boards to three or just their own board if the director is an executive of another public company;

expanded the Compensation Committee’s responsibilities to oversee and advise the Board about human capital management strategies and policies;

adopted a proxy access right for shareholders;policy to explain the exclusion of certain legal and compliance costs from our incentive performance metrics;

expanded the Nominating and Governance Committee’s oversight to include environmental sustainability and other corporate citizenship activities as well as lobbying activities and expenditures;

changed the long-term incentive compensation mix for executives, increasing the proportion of PSUs to 60% and eliminating stock options;

enhanced our disclosuresexecutive compensation clawback provision;

added a chairman’s letter to our proxy statement;

increased our communications about the Ad Hoc Committee and the Board’s oversight of our anti-diversion program;

enhanced our disclosures regarding the Board’s role in strategy and risk oversight;

formalized our annual individual director evaluation process and expanded our disclosure about the annual Board evaluation process;

enhanced our executive compensation clawback provision;opioid-related issues; and

enhanced our disclosures regarding how we identify, addseparated the Chairman of the Board and on-board new directors.Chief Executive Officer roles.

 

Cardinal Health|2018 Proxy Statement21

Cardinal Health | 2020 Proxy Statement    25


Back to Contents

Director Compensation

Overview

Decisions regarding ourOur non-management director compensation program areis approved by our Board of Directors based on recommendationsthe recommendation of the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee receives comparative market data and recommendations from its compensation consultant with regard to the structure and amounts of our non-management director compensation. Total non-management director compensation is targeted at the median amount among our Comparator Group, which is discussed in detail on page 33.37.

Following the Compensation Committee’s most recent review of non-management director compensation in May 2019, and based on the recommendation of its compensation consultant, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board, and the Board approved, increases to the annual retainers and the annual restricted share unit (“RSU”) grants effective in November 2018.2019. The new compensation alignschanges aligned with our target of the median director compensation for the fiscal 2019 Comparator Group, which is described on page 33. PriorGroup. There were no changes made to this change, director compensation arrangements were last changed in November 2015.for fiscal 2021.

Compensation Arrangements

The table below shows the elements and amount of compensation that we paypaid to our non-management directors.directors during fiscal 2020.

Compensation Element

Amount until

November 6, 2018

($)

Amount on and after

November 7, 2018

($)

Amount until November 5, 2019

($)

Amount on and after November 6, 2019

($)

Annual retainer(1)

100,000

105,000

105,000

115,000

RSUs(2)

160,000

175,000

175,000

185,000

Committee chair annual retainer(1)

 

 

Audit Committee

20,000

25,000

25,000

Compensation Committee

15,000

20,000

20,000

Nominating and Governance Committee

10,000

15,000

15,000

Lead Director compensation

 

Annual retainer(1)

20,000

RSUs

20,000

Non-executive Chairman of the Board compensation

 

 

Annual retainer(1)

125,000

125,000

RSUs

125,000

(1)

Retainer amounts are paid in cash in quarterly installments.

(2)

Each non-management director receives an annual RSU grant on the date of our Annual Meeting of Shareholders. We value the RSUs based on the closing share price on the grant date. RSUs vest one year from the grant date (or on the date of the next Annual Meeting of Shareholders, if earlier) and settle in common shares. We accrue cash dividend equivalents that are payable upon vesting of the RSUs. All unvested RSUs become fully vested upon a “change of control” (as defined under “Potential Payments on Termination of Employment and Change of Control” on page 45) unless the director is asked to continue to serve on the board of directors of the surviving entity or its affiliates and receives a qualifying replacement award.

Annual RSUs

125,000

(1)

Retainer amounts are paid in cash in quarterly installments.

(2)

Each new non-management director receives an initial RSU grant and an annual RSU grant on the date of our Annual Meeting of Shareholders. The initial grant is prorated to reflect service between the election date and the one-year anniversary of the prior year’s Annual Meeting of Shareholders. We value the RSUs based on the closing share price on the grant date. RSUs vest one year from the grant date (or, for annual grants, on the date of the next Annual Meeting of Shareholders, if earlier) and settle in common shares. We accrue cash dividend equivalents that are payable upon vesting of the RSUs. All unvested RSUs become fully vested upon a “change of control” (as defined under “Potential Payments on Termination of Employment and Change of Control” on page 50) unless the director is asked to continue to serve on the board of directors of the surviving entity or its affiliates and receives a qualifying replacement award.

(1)

Retainer amounts are paid in cash in quarterly installments.

(2)

Each new non-management director receives an initial RSU grant and an annual RSU grant on the date of our Annual Meeting of Shareholders. The initial grant is prorated to reflect service between the election date and the one-year anniversary of the prior year’s Annual Meeting of Shareholders. We value the RSUs based on the closing share price on the grant date. RSUs vest one year from the grant date (or, for annual grants, on the date of the next Annual Meeting of Shareholders, if earlier) and settle in common shares. We accrue cash dividend equivalents that are payable upon vesting of the RSUs. All unvested RSUs become fully vested upon a “change of control” (as defined under “Potential Payments on Termination of Employment and Change of Control” on page 50) unless the director is asked to continue to serve on the board of directors of the surviving entity or its affiliates and receives a qualifying replacement award.

Directors may receive additional compensation for performing duties assigned by the Board or its committees that are considered beyond the scope of the ordinary responsibilities of directors or committee members. During fiscal 2018, the Board approved additional compensation of $10,000 per year for each of Messrs. Darden and Kenny and Ms. Cox receive $10,000 per year for service on the Ad Hoc Committee and Mr. Downey receives $25,000 per year for Mr. Downey for service as the chair ofchairing the Ad Hoc Committee.

Directors may elect to defer payment of their cash retainers into the Cardinal Health Deferred Compensation Plan (“DCP”). For directors, deferred balances under the DCP are paid in cash upon termination from Board service, death or disability in a single lump sum or annual installment payments over a period of five or ten years. A director also may defer receipt of common shares that otherwise would be issued on the date that RSUs vest until termination from Board service.

Our directors may participate in our matching gift program. Under this program and subject to certain restrictions, the Cardinal Health Foundation (our philanthropic affiliate) will match contributions for eligible non-profit organizations.

 

www.cardinalhealth.com

Cardinal Health|20182020 Proxy Statement22    26


Back to Contents

Director Compensation for Fiscal 20182020

The non-management directors received the following compensation during fiscal 2018:2020:

Name

Fees Earned or

Paid in Cash

($)

 

Stock

Awards

($)(1)

All Other

Compensation

($)

 

Total

($)

Fees Earned or

Paid in Cash

($)

 

Stock Awards

($)

(1) 

All Other

Compensation

($)

 

Total

($)

David J. Anderson

100,000

 

159,977

 

259,977

Colleen F. Arnold

100,000

 

159,977

 

259,977

111,522

 

184,999

 

 

296,521

Carrie S. Cox

103,600

(2)

159,977

 

263,577

141,522

 

184,999

 

2,000

(2)

328,521

Calvin Darden

103,600

(2)

159,977

3,000

(3)

266,577

121,522

 

184,999

 

2,000

(2)

308,521

Bruce L. Downey

109,028

(2)

159,977

 

269,005

136,522

 

184,999

 

 

321,521

Patricia A. Hemingway Hall

100,000

 

159,977

 

259,977

126,522

 

184,999

 

 

311,521

Akhil Johri(4)

39,722

 

 

39,722

Clayton M. Jones

120,000

 

159,977

 

279,977

Akhil Johri

111,522

 

184,999

 

 

296,521

Gregory B. Kenny

133,600

(2)

179,981

13,000

(3)

326,581

246,522

 

310,024

 

2,000

(2)

558,546

Nancy Killefer

100,000

 

159,977

 

259,977

111,522

 

184,999

 

 

296,521

David P. King

115,000

 

159,977

 

274,977

(1)

These awards are RSUs granted under the Amended Cardinal Health, Inc. 2011 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “2011 LTIP”). We valued the RSUs by multiplying the closing price of our common shares on the NYSE on the grant date by the number of RSUs awarded. As of June 30, 2018, the aggregate number of shares underlying unvested RSUs held by each director serving on that date was 2,623 shares, except for Mr. Kenny, which was 2,951 shares. Mr. Anderson forfeited these RSUs when he resigned from the Board in September 2018.

(2)

Includes compensation for service on the Ad Hoc Committee.

(3)

Represents a company match attributable to a charitable contribution under our matching gift program.

(4)

Mr. Johri joined the Board in February 2018.

J. Michael Losh

136,522

 

184,999

 

2,000

(2)

323,521

Dean A. Scarborough

93,832

 

217,113

(3)

2,000

(2)

312,945

John H. Weiland

93,832

 

217,113

(3)

 

310,945

(1)

These awards are RSUs granted under the Amended Cardinal Health, Inc. 2011 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “2011 LTIP”). We valued the RSUs by multiplying the closing price of our common shares on the NYSE on the grant date by the number of RSUs awarded. As of June 30, 2020, the aggregate number of shares underlying unvested RSUs held by each director serving on that date was as follows: Ms. Arnold — 3,424 shares; Ms. Cox — 3,424 shares; Mr. Darden — 3,424 shares; Mr. Downey — 3,424 shares; Ms. Hemingway Hall — 3,424 shares; Mr. Johri — 3,424 shares; Mr. Kenny — 5,738 shares; Ms. Killefer — 3,424 shares; Mr. Losh — 3,424 shares; Mr. Scarborough — 4,090; and Mr. Weiland — 4,090.

(2)

Represents a company match attributable to a charitable contribution under our matching gift program.

(3)

Includes initial RSU grants made in September 2019.

(1)

These awards are RSUs granted under the Amended Cardinal Health, Inc. 2011 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “2011 LTIP”). We valued the RSUs by multiplying the closing price of our common shares on the NYSE on the grant date by the number of RSUs awarded. As of June 30, 2020, the aggregate number of shares underlying unvested RSUs held by each director serving on that date was as follows: Ms. Arnold — 3,424 shares; Ms. Cox — 3,424 shares; Mr. Darden — 3,424 shares; Mr. Downey — 3,424 shares; Ms. Hemingway Hall — 3,424 shares; Mr. Johri — 3,424 shares; Mr. Kenny — 5,738 shares; Ms. Killefer — 3,424 shares; Mr. Losh — 3,424 shares; Mr. Scarborough — 4,090; and Mr. Weiland — 4,090.

(2)

Represents a company match attributable to a charitable contribution under our matching gift program.

(3)

Includes initial RSU grants made in September 2019.

Related Person Transactions Policy and Process

Related Person Transactions Policy

The Board followsWe have a written policy that the Audit Committee must approve or ratify any “related person transactions” (transactions exceeding $120,000 in which we are a participant and any related person has a direct or indirect material interest). “Related persons” include our directors, nominees for election as a director, persons controlling over 5% of our common shares, executive officers and the immediate family members of each of these individuals.

Once a related person transaction is identified, the Audit Committee will review all the relevant facts and circumstances and determine whether to approve the transaction. The Audit Committee will take into account such factors as it considers appropriate, including the material terms of the transaction, the nature of the related person’s interest in the transaction, the significance of the transaction to the related person and us, the nature of the related person’s relationship with us and whether the transaction would be likely to impair the judgment of a director or executive officer to act in our best interest.

If advance approval of a transaction is not feasible, the Audit Committee will consider the transaction for ratification at its next regularly scheduled meeting. The Audit Committee Chairman may pre-approve or ratify any related person transactions in which the aggregate amount is expected to be less than $1 million.

Related Person Transactions

Since July 1, 2017,2019, there have been no transactions, and there are no currently proposed transactions, involving an amount exceeding $120,000 in which we were or are to be a participant and in which any related person had or will have a direct or indirect material interest, except as described below.

David J. Anderson, who resigned from the Board in September 2018, served as Chief Financial Officer of Alexion, a biotechnology company, from December 11, 2016 until July 31, 2017, and as an employee of Alexion until August 31, 2017. When Mr. Anderson joined Alexion, we had a preexisting commercial relationship with Alexion, which was negotiated at arm’s length and in the ordinary course of business and which has continued since Mr. Anderson ended his employment with Alexion. From July 1, 2017 through August 31, 2017, we purchased $67 million of Alexion product for distribution to our customers. Mr. Anderson was not involved in any decisions or activities directly associated with the transactions between Alexion and us. These transactions were approved by our Audit Committee in accordance with the Related Person Transactions Policy.interest.

 

Cardinal Health|2018 Proxy Statement23

Cardinal Health | 2020 Proxy Statement    27


Back to Contents

Audit Committee Matters

Ratification of Appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as Independent Auditor

The Audit Committee is directly responsible for the appointment, compensation, retention and oversight of our independent auditor and approves the audit engagement letter with Ernst & Young LLP and its audit fees. The Audit Committee has appointed Ernst & Young LLP as our independent auditor for fiscal 20192021 and believes that the continued retention of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent auditor is in the best interest of Cardinal Health and its shareholders. Ernst & Young LLP has served as our independent auditor since 2002. In accordance with SEC rules, lead audit partners are subject to rotation requirements, which limit the number of consecutive years an individual partner may serve us. The Audit Committee oversees the rotation of the audit partners. The Audit Committee Chairman interviews candidates for audit partner and the Audit Committee discusses them.

While not required by law, we are asking our shareholders to ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent auditor for fiscal 20192021 at the Annual Meeting as a matter of good corporate governance. If shareholders do not ratify this appointment, the Audit Committee will consider whether it is appropriate to appoint another audit firm. Even if the appointment is ratified, the Audit Committee in its discretion may appoint a different audit firm at any time during the fiscal year if it determines that such a change would be in the best interest of the companyCardinal Health and its shareholders. Our Audit Committee approved, and our shareholders ratified with 98%99% support, the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent auditor for fiscal 2018.2020.

We expect representatives of Ernst & Young LLP to be present atattend the Annual Meeting. They will have an opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so and to respond to appropriate questions from shareholders.

The Board recommends that you vote FOR the proposal to ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent auditor for fiscal 2019.2021.

Audit Committee Report

The Audit Committee is responsible for overseeing: the integrity of Cardinal Health’s financialstatements; the independent auditor’s qualifications, independence and performance; Cardinal Health’s internal audit function; Cardinal Health’s ethics and compliance program and its compliance with legal and regulatory requirements; and Cardinal Health’s processes for assessing and managing risk. TheAs of the date of this report, the Audit Committee currently consists of five members of the Board of Directors. The Board of Directors has determined that each current Committee memberof Messrs. Johri, Losh and Scarborough is an “audit committee financial expert” for purposes of the SEC rules and that each Committee member is independent. The Audit Committee’s activities are governed by a written charter, which is available on Cardinal Health’s website at www.cardinalhealth.com under “About Us — Corporate — Investor Relations — Corporate Governance — Board Committees and Charters.”

Management has primary responsibility for the financial statements and for establishing and maintaining the system of internal control over financial reporting. Management also is responsible for reporting on the effectiveness of Cardinal Health’s internal control over financial reporting. Cardinal Health’s independent auditor, Ernst & Young LLP, is responsible for performing an independent audit of Cardinal Health’s consolidated financial statements and for issuing a report on the financial statements and a report on the effectiveness of Cardinal Health’s internal control over financial reporting based on its audit.

The Audit Committee reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended June 30, 20182020 with management and with Ernst & Young LLP. The Audit Committee also reviewed and discussed with management and Ernst & Young LLP the effectiveness of Cardinal Health’s internal control over financial reporting as well as management’s report and Ernst & Young LLP’s report on the subject. The Audit Committee discussed with Ernst & Young LLP the matters related to the conduct of its audit that are required to be communicated by auditors to audit committees under applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (the “PCAOB”) and the SEC and matters related to Cardinal Health’s financial statements, including critical accounting estimates and judgments. The Audit Committee received from Ernst & Young LLP the written disclosures and letter required by the applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding Ernst & Young LLP’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence from Cardinal Health required by applicable PCAOB requirements and discussed with Ernst & Young LLP’sLLP its independence.

www.cardinalhealth.com

Cardinal Health|2018 Proxy Statement24


Back to Contents

The Audit Committee meets regularly with Ernst & Young LLP, with and without management present, to review the overall scope and plans for Ernst & Young LLP’s audit work and to discuss the results of its examinations, the evaluation of Cardinal Health’s internal control over financial reporting, and the overall quality of Cardinal Health’s accounting and financial reporting. In addition, the Audit Committee annually considers the performance of Ernst & Young LLP.

www.cardinalhealth.com

Cardinal Health | 2020 Proxy Statement    28


Back to Contents

In reliance on the review and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended June 30, 20182020 be included in Cardinal Health’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for filing with the SEC.

Submitted by the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors on August 20, 2018.12, 2020.

Clayton M. Jones,J. Michael Losh, Chairman
David J. Anderson(1)
Bruce L. Downey
Patricia A. Hemingway HallColleen F. Arnold
Akhil Johri
Dean A. Scarborough
John H. Weiland

Fees Paid to Ernst & Young LLP

The following table sets forth the fees billed to us by Ernst & Young LLP for services in fiscal 20182020 and 2017.2019.

Fiscal 2018

($)

Fiscal 2017

($)

Fiscal 2020

($)

Fiscal 2019

($)

Audit fees(1)

12,696,980

9,546,537

13,538,845

13,380,007

Audit-related fees(2)

1,480,461

2,722,451

3,488,545

2,168,768

Tax fees(3)

588,408

841,082

684,174

730,995

All other fees

TOTAL FEES

14,765,849

13,110,070

17,711,564

16,279,770

(1)

Audit fees include fees paid to Ernst & Young LLP related to the annual audit of consolidated financial statements, the annual audit of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, the review of financial statements included in Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and statutory audits of various international subsidiaries. Audit fees also include fees for services performed by Ernst & Young LLP that are closely related to the audit and in many cases could only be provided by the independent auditor, such as comfort letters and consents related to SEC registration statements. The year-over-year increase in audit fees was due primarily to services provided by Ernst & Young LLP in connection with the recently-acquired Patient Recovery business and a multi-year project to replace certain Pharmaceutical segment finance and operating information systems.

(2)

Audit-related fees include fees for services related to acquisitions and divestitures, audit-related research and assistance, internal control reviews, service auditor’s examination reports and employee benefit plan audits.

(3)

Tax fees include fees for tax compliance and other tax-related services. The aggregate fees billed to us by Ernst & Young LLP for tax compliance and other tax-related services for fiscal 2018 were $588,408 and $0, respectively, and for fiscal 2017 were $797,514 and $43,568, respectively.

(1)

Audit fees include fees paid to Ernst & Young LLP related to the annual audit of consolidated financial statements, the annual audit of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, the review of financial statements included in Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and statutory audits of various international subsidiaries. Audit fees also include fees for services performed by Ernst & Young LLP that are closely related to the audit and in many cases could only be provided by the independent auditor, such as comfort letters and consents related to SEC registration statements.

(2)

Audit-related fees include fees for services related to acquisitions and divestitures, audit-related research and assistance, service auditor’s examination reports and employee benefit plan audits.

(3)

Tax fees include fees for tax compliance and other tax-related services. The aggregate fees billed to us by Ernst & Young LLP for tax compliance for fiscal 2020 and 2019 were $267,468 and $724,560, respectively.

(1)

Audit fees include fees paid to Ernst & Young LLP related to the annual audit of consolidated financial statements, the annual audit of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, the review of financial statements included in Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and statutory audits of various international subsidiaries. Audit fees also include fees for services performed by Ernst & Young LLP that are closely related to the audit and in many cases could only be provided by the independent auditor, such as comfort letters and consents related to SEC registration statements.

(2)

Audit-related fees include fees for services related to acquisitions and divestitures, audit-related research and assistance, service auditor’s examination reports and employee benefit plan audits.

(3)

Tax fees include fees for tax compliance and other tax-related services. The aggregate fees billed to us by Ernst & Young LLP for tax compliance for fiscal 2020 and 2019 were $267,468 and $724,560, respectively.

Policy on Pre-Approval of Services Provided by Ernst & Young LLP

The Audit Committee must pre-approve the audit and permissible non-audit services performed by our independent accountants in order to help ensure that the accountants remain independent fromof Cardinal Health. The Audit Committee has adopted a policy governing this pre-approval process.

Under the policy, the Audit Committee annually pre-approves certain services and assigns specific dollar thresholds for these types of services. If a proposed service is not included in the annual pre-approval, the Audit Committee must separately pre-approve the service before the engagement begins.

The Audit Committee has delegated pre-approval authority to the Audit Committee Chairman for proposed services up to $500,000. Proposed services exceeding $500,000 require full Audit Committee approval.

All audit and non-audit services provided for us by Ernst & Young LLP for fiscal 20182020 and 20172019 were pre-approved by the Audit Committee.

(1)

Mr. Anderson resigned from the Board in September 2018.

 

Cardinal Health|2018 Proxy Statement25

Cardinal Health | 2020 Proxy Statement    29


Back to Contents

Executive Compensation

Advisory Vote to Approve the Compensation of Our Named Executive Officers

In accordance with Section 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), we are asking our shareholders to approve, on a non-binding advisory basis, the compensation of our named executive officers, as disclosed in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the Summary Compensation Table and the related compensation tables, notes and narrative in this proxy statement.

We urge shareholders to read the Compensation Discussion and Analysis beginning on the next page of this proxy statement, which describes in more detail how our executive compensation program operates and is designed to achieve our compensation objectives, as well as the Summary Compensation Table and related compensation tables, notes and narrative appearing on pages 3540 through 47,50, which provide detailed information on the compensation of our named executive officers.

Although this advisory vote is not binding on the Board, the Board and the Compensation Committee will review and consider the voting results when evaluating our executive compensation program.

The Board has adopted a policy providing for annual say-on-pay advisory votes. Accordingly, the next say-on-pay advisory vote will be held at our 20192021 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

The Board recommends that you vote FOR the approval, on a non-binding advisory basis, of the compensation of our named executive officers, as disclosed in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the Summary Compensation Table and the related compensation tables, notes and narrative in this proxy statement.

 

www.cardinalhealth.com

Cardinal Health|20182020 Proxy Statement26    30


Back to Contents

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Executive Summary

This Compensation Discussion and Analysis focuses on the fiscal 2020 compensation of the following current and former executive officers (the “named executive officers” or “named executives”) for fiscal 2018 and describes the executive compensation program and the Compensation Committee’s decisions under it.

 

Michael C. Kaufmann

Chief Executive Officer

GeorgeS.Barrett

ExecutiveChairmanoftheBoard

JorgeJason M. GomezHollar

Chief Financial Officer

JonVictor L. GiacominCrawford

ChiefExecutiveOfficerPharmaceuticalSegment

StephenM.Mason

Chief Executive Officer Medical Segment

CraigJessica S.L. MorfordMayer

Chief Legal and Compliance Officer

PatriciaDavid B.C. MorrisonEvans

RetiredFormer ExecutiveVicePresident,CustomerSupportServicesandInterim Chief InformationFinancial Officer

DonaldJorge M. CaseyJr.Gomez

FormerChiefExecutiveFinancial OfficerMedicalSegment

Fiscal 20182020 Highlights

During fiscal 2020, we grew non-GAAP operating earnings, exceeded our non-GAAP EPS guidance range, surpassed our enterprise cost savings target, and strengthened our balance sheet, all while continuing to execute on our long-term strategic priorities in a rapidly-changing environment.

We achieved fiscal 2020 results as we adapted our operations to address the unique challenges presented by COVID-19. In response to the pandemic, we continued to maintain operations in all our distribution facilities, nuclear pharmacies and global manufacturing plants and successfully transitioned our office employees to a remote work model. Through all of this, our focus remained on delivering critical products and services to our customers, while protecting the health and safety of our employees.

Fiscal 2020 highlights include:

Revenue was $152.9 billion, up 5% from the prior year.

GAAP operating loss was $(4.1) billion due to an opioid litigation charge and non-GAAP operating earnings were $2.4 billion, a 1% increase over the prior year. Non-GAAP operating earnings grew despite an estimated net negative impact of approximately $100 million from COVID-19.

GAAP diluted loss per share was $(12.61) due to the opioid litigation charge and non-GAAP EPS was $5.45, a 3% increase over the prior year.

We returned over $900 million to shareholders in dividends ($569 million) and share repurchases ($350 million) and repaid $1.4 billion of long-term debt.

Our Pharmaceutical segment performance exceeded our expectations. Revenue grew 6% to $137.5 billion. Segment profit decreased 4% to $1.8 billion, reflecting the expected adverse impact of Pharmaceutical Distribution customer contract renewals.

Our Medical segment revenue decreased 1% percent to $15.4 billion due to the adverse impact from COVID-19. Segment profit increased 15% to $663 million largely due to cost savings and the favorable year-over-year impact of a supplier charge taken last year, partially offset by the negative impact of COVID-19.

We surpassed our enterprise cost savings target, with significant savings contributions from Medical global manufacturing and supply chain.

We completed the divestiture of our successful investment in naviHealth.

We agreed in principle to a global settlement framework designed to resolve all opioid lawsuits and claims by states and political subdivisions and continue to work with state attorneys general and representatives of political subdivisions to achieve a global settlement.

Our generic pharmaceuticals program performed better than expected with a slight favorable impact on Pharmaceutical segment profit after several years of a negative impact.

Our Medical segment managed a voluntary recall for surgical gowns and three voluntary field actions for Presource surgical procedure packs containing affected surgical gowns.

We launched “Our Path Forward” outlining the plans and initiatives underway to advance our corporate culture objectives. We added new culture goals (including a diversity and inclusion goal) to our annual cash incentive and PSU programs.

Non-GAAP operating earnings growth and strong performance against new strategic measures for cost savings and culture drove a fiscal 2020 annual cash incentive funding of 120% at the enterprise level.

Our non-GAAP EPS performance over the past three years has negatively impacted our named executives’ long-term incentive pay. We had a 19% payout for the PSUs that vested in fiscal 2020 and no PSU payouts in fiscal 2018 and 2019.

See Annex A for reconciliations to the comparable GAAP financial measures and the reasons why we positioneduse non-GAAP financial measures.

Compensation and Benefit Actions in Response to COVID-19

During the company for future growth, making a numberpandemic, we took actions to help our employees, including allowing those who are sick with or who have been exposed to COVID-19 to take time off without impacting their paid-time-off days, expanding availability of changes. In November 2017,child and elder back-up care, and increasing communications

Cardinal Health | 2020 Proxy Statement    31


Back to Contents

to employees of the variety of well-being resources available to them, with an emphasis on mental health. We also provided additional compensation to frontline employees who continued to work during the pandemic, keeping our distribution centers, manufacturing plants and other sites running and supporting our healthcare provider customers.

For fiscal 2021, considering the performance uncertainties related to COVID-19, we announceddecided that employees at the Vice President level and above (including our succession plans for Chief Executive Officer andnamed executives) will not receive base salary increases, while non-supervisory (including frontline) employees will receive standard merit base salary increases.

Even with the unexpected negative impact of COVID-19 (approximately $100 million), we did not adjust either our annual incentive or PSU performance goals or results to remove this impact.

CFO Transitions

Jason Hollar became Chief Financial Officer followed by other senior leadership changes lateron May 26, 2020. He was formerly Chief Financial Officer of Tenneco Inc. To address compensation forfeited at his former employer, we provided Mr. Hollar with initial long-term incentive grants of $1.0 million in the fiscal year. These transitions have gone very well.PSUs and $1.0 million in RSUs and a $1.55 million cash sign-on bonus. He also received a $200,000 lump sum payment for relocation.

In January 2018, Mr. Kaufmann became our Chief Executive Officer, succeeding Mr. Barrett,Hollar replaced David Evans who had served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer for nine years. Mr. Kaufmann is a 28-year veteran of Cardinal Health who has held a range of senior leadership roles in both segments. He was most recentlyour interim Chief Financial Officer from September 1, 2019 to May 25, 2020. In his interim role, Mr. Evans received cash compensation of $220,000 per month during his employment and also oversaw Global Sourcing.

Mr. Barrett becamedid not participate in our annual or long-term incentive plans or our Senior Executive Chairman of the Board in January 2018 and will retire from the Board at the Annual Meeting. Following Mr. Barrett’s retirement, Mr. Kenny, the Board’s independent Lead Director, will become the non-executive Chairman of the Board.Severance Plan.

Mr. Gomez succeeded Mr. Kaufmann as Chief Financial Officer. Over his 12-year career with Cardinal Health, Mr. Gomez has served asFormer Chief Financial Officer for both segments, as well as TreasurerJorge Gomez left the company in August 2019 to pursue another opportunity. He did not receive severance and Corporate Controller.forfeited his annual incentive and unvested long-term incentive awards.

In February 2018, Mr. Giacomin transitionedOther Executive Transitions

Stephen Mason was promoted to Chief Executive Officer — Medical Segment from Chief Executive Officer — Pharmaceutical Segment. During his nearly 17 years atin August 2019. Mr. Mason, a 21-year veteran of Cardinal Health, Mr. Giacomin has served in a varietypreviously led the Cardinal Health at-Home business within the Medical segment.

Shareholder Engagement and Consideration of operational leadership positions.

The following are fiscal 2018 performance highlights:

To establish a foundation for future growth, we initiated a comprehensive review of our business focused on our portfolio, cost structure and capital deployment. Fiscal 2018 accomplishments and future areas of focus include:

See Annex A for the reasons why we use non-GAAP financial measures and reconciliations to the comparable GAAP financial measures.

Cardinal Health|2018 Proxy Statement27


Back to Contents

Results of 2017 Advisory2019 “Say-on-Pay” Vote to Approve Executive Compensation and Shareholder Engagement

At the 20172019 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, our say-on-pay“say-on-pay” advisory vote received 96%93% support, our sixtheighth straight year of over 90% shareholder support. The Compensation Committee considered this vote as well as shareholder feedback from our shareholder engagement as demonstrating strong support for our executive compensation program and maintained the structure of our executive compensation program when making compensation decisions for fiscal 2018.program.

It has been our long-standing practice to actively engage with our shareholders throughout the year so that management and the Board can better understand shareholder perspectives on topics like executive compensation. During fiscal 2018,2020, we again engaged with governance professionals from our largest shareholders collectively representing approximately 50% of our outstanding shares.shareholders. (See page 2125 for further detail about shareholder engagement.)

Compensation Philosophy and Practices

Our compensation program is designed to support our long-term growth, with accountability for key annual results. It has the following key objectives:

Reward performance. We tie our executive pay to financial, operational and individual performance.

Drivestockownership. We use long-term incentive grants combined with stock ownership guidelines to provide executives with meaningful ownership stakes and align their interests with shareholders.

Emphasize long-term,stock-based incentive compensation. We emphasize performance and retention through the use ofusing long-term, stock-based incentive compensation, which supports sustainable long-term shareholder return. Combined with stock ownership guidelines, it provides executives with meaningful ownership stakes and aligns their interests with shareholders.

Maintain a competitive program that will attract and retain critical talent.We have designed our compensation program to be competitive in the marketplace and to invest in and reward talent, driving theour long-term growth of the company while holding employees accountable to our strategy and our values.

Executive Compensation Governance Features

What We Have

 

What We Do Not Have

Significant portion of executive pay consists of performance-based “at risk” elements

No employment agreements with executive team

Performance goals for cost savings and corporate culture (including diversity and inclusion)

 

No dividend equivalents on unvested PSUs or RSUs

Different metrics for annual cash incentives and PSUs

No repricing of underwater options without shareholder approval

Caps on annual cash incentive and PSU payouts

 

No hedgingexecutive pensions or pledging of company stocksupplemental retirement plans

Minimum vesting period for long-term incentive awards

 

No executive pensions or supplemental retirement plansrepricing of underwater options without shareholder approval

Stock ownership guidelines for directors and executive officers

 

No “single trigger” changehedging or pledging of control arrangementscompany stock

Enhanced compensationCompensation recoupment (“clawback”) provision

 

No excise tax gross-ups upon“single trigger” change of control arrangement

Long-standing, proactive shareholder engagement program

 

No employment agreements with current executive teamexcise tax gross-ups upon change of control

 

www.cardinalhealth.com

Cardinal Health|20182020 Proxy Statement28    32


Back to Contents

Elements of Fiscal 2018 Compensation for Executive Officers

We have three elements ofOur executive officers’ total direct compensation:compensation has three elements: base salary,salary; annual incentivesincentive; and long-term incentives. Forincentive. In fiscal 2018,2020, long-term incentives consisted of an equally-weighted mix of performance share units (“PSUs”), stock optionsincentive awards were granted 60% in PSUs and 40% in RSUs. A significant portion of executive compensation was performance-basedis based on company performance and is at-risk (annual incentives, PSUsincentive and stock options)PSUs). As discussed below, atAt the beginning of each fiscal year,performance period, the Compensation Committee sets performance goals under our annual incentive planprogram and PSUs. After the performance period ends, the Compensation Committee evaluates actualthe performance and determines payouts. The charts below show the fiscal 2020 target total direct compensation for our Chief Executive Officer and other current named executives.

Pay Element

Description and Purpose

Links to Business and Talent Strategies

Basesalary

•  Fixed cash compensation, which is reviewed annually and adjusted when appropriate

•  Set basedBased on qualifications, experience, role, performance, in the role, career progression, market data and internal pay equity

•  

Competitive base salaries support our ability to attract and retain executive talent

Annual incentivesincentive

•  Variable cash compensation based on achieving goals for annual financial goals and operationaladjusted non-GAAP operating earnings, tangible capital, cost savings, culture objectives and individual performance

•  Target as a percentage of base salary reflects market data and internal pay equity

•  Primary financial measure reflects our focus on operating earnings, with tangible capital modifier promoting efficient use of capital

•  Cost savings goal and culture goals focused on performance and change management and diversity and inclusion were added for fiscal 2020 to align with key strategic initiatives

Executives are assessed on their individual performance, and theincluding their alignment of their behavior with our StandardsofBusinessConduct, values and leadership essentials, balancing the “what” and the “how” of individual performancemanagement behaviors

Long-term incentivesincentive

•  Equally weighted betweenWeighted 60% in PSUs stock options and 40% in RSUs

•  PSUs vest based on achieving goals for adjusted non-GAAP EPS, goalscost savings and culture objectives over three years, subject towith a total shareholder return (“TSR”) modifier; stock options and RSUs vest ratably over three years

•  Target annual grant value reflects market data and internal pay equity

•  Supports sustainable long-term shareholder return and closely aligns management’s interests with shareholders’ interests

•  PSU performance measureNon-GAAP EPS is a primary measure for evaluating our performance and is closely followed by the investment community

•  Cost savings goal and culture goal focused on our employee engagement survey results were added to PSUs in fiscal 2020 to align with key strategic initiatives

Long-term incentives help to retain executive talent and promote focus on stock price appreciation

Base Salary

In connection withAt the beginning of fiscal 2020, the Compensation Committee increased the base salaries of Mr. Kaufmann’s appointment to Chief Executive Officer,Kaufmann by 8%, Mr. Gomez’s appointment toCrawford by 4% and Ms. Mayer by 5%.

The Compensation Committee set Mr. Hollar’s base salary at $700,000 when he joined us as Chief Financial Officer and set Mr. Giacomin’s appointmentMason’s base salary at $525,000 when he was promoted to Chief Executive Officer — Medical Segment early in the Compensation Committee set their base salaries at $1,150,000, $550,000 and $775,000, respectively. Atfiscal year.

Later in the beginning of fiscal 2018,year, the Compensation Committee increased eachMr. Mason’s base salary by an additional 19% and Ms. Mayer’s base salary by an additional 5% based on market data for their respective roles. As internal hires, the Compensation Committee initially had set Mr. Mason’s and Ms. Mayer’s target total direct compensation lower in the market range with the expectation of the named executives’ base salaries between 2% and 6%.adjusting it based on strong performance.

 

Cardinal Health|2018 Proxy Statement29

Cardinal Health | 2020 Proxy Statement    33


Back to Contents

Annual Incentive Compensation

Fiscal 20182020 Goal Setting and Results

AtThe Compensation Committee made changes to the fiscal 2020 annual incentive performance program, adding new strategic measures for cost savings and culture objectives to determine 30% of the payout. As noted earlier, even with the unexpected negative impact of COVID-19 (approximately $100 million), we did not adjust either our annual incentive performance goals or results to remove this impact.

Operatingearningsgoal. The Compensation Committee set the adjusted non-GAAP operating earnings target at the beginning of fiscal 2018,2020 to align with the Board-approved budget for non-GAAP operating earnings. While the target was set below fiscal 2019 results, the Committee determined that it was appropriate and consistent with the budget and our public guidance, which reflected headwinds due to customer contract renewals and then-expected generic program performance. In light of these factors, the Compensation Committee set the annual incentive target, which called for us to achieve the Board-approved budget of 2.9% non-GAAP operatingestablished a payout curve that would not exceed 100% until year-over-year growth was achieved.

The earnings growth for a 100% payout. As in past years, the Compensation Committee set the fiscal 2018 earnings goal is based on non-GAAP operating earnings because it is one of our primary measures of operating performance. OnceIf we achieve the threshold earnings performance,goal, tangible capital management continues to beoperates as a modifier because itof the payout. Tangible capital management focuses on the efficient use of capital.

Strategicgoals. The Compensation Committee set the target for cost savings to align with our publicly announced fiscal 2020 cost savings goal. The Committee set targets for corporate culture goals to advance the “Our Path Forward” initiatives discussed beginning on page 23. The culture goals, which were measured quantitatively on an enterprise-wide basis, focused on performance management (employees entering goals and performance conversation acknowledgments into our internal tracking system), change management (designated leaders completing change management playbooks), and diversity and inclusion (employees completing unconscious bias training).

We describe how we calculate these measures under “Annual Cash Incentive and PSU Performance“Performance Measure Calculations” beginning on page 40.43.

The Compensation Committee decided that the annual incentive performance funding results in the table below were appropriate with no adjustment for the positives and negatives for fiscal 2020. These included strong management performance through the COVID-19 pandemic and organizational accountability for the surgical gown recall.

Actual

($)

 

Threshold

($)

 

Target

($)

 

Maximum

($)

 

(dollars in millions)

Weighting

Threshold

 

Target

 

Maximum

 

Actual

 

Percent of

Target

Impact on

Enterprise

Funding

Adjusted non-GAAP operating earnings(1)

2,655

 

2,393

 

2,850

 

3,377

 

70%

$1,966

 

$2,269

 

$2,722

 

$2,404

 

106

       80

pp

Tangible capital modifier(1)(2)

1,085

 

2,812

 

2,344

 

1,874

 

 

$897

 

$748

 

$598

 

$775

 

NA

-1

pp

Enterprise funding percentage

102

%

40

%

100

%

200

%

(1)

Tangible capital below $2,344 million increased the enterprise funding percentage (which is the funding as a percentage of the target payout for the entire company) by up to 10 percentage points until it reached $1,874 million. Tangible capital above $2,344 million reduced the enterprise funding percentage by up to 10 percentage points until it reached $2,812 million. Decreases below $1,874 million and increases above $2,812 million had no further impact on the enterprise funding percentage. Actual fiscal 2018 tangible capital performance increased the enterprise funding percentage by 10 percentage points.

Cost savings(3)

20%

$50

 

$130

 

$250

 

$200

 

154

30

pp

Our Path Forward Culture(3)

10%

1 rating

 

3 rating

 

5 rating

 

4 rating

 

145

15

pp

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

123

%

Final enterprise funding percentage

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

120

%

The sum of the components and certain computations may reflect rounding adjustments.

The sum of the components and certain computations may reflect rounding adjustments.

(1)

A payout level between 40% and 200% is earned for achieving the adjusted non-GAAP operating earnings goals (adjusted for tangible capital). The payout curve would not exceed 100% until we achieved growth over fiscal 2019 adjusted non-GAAP operating earnings of $2,382 million.

(2)

Tangible capital modifies adjusted non-GAAP operating earnings performance by up to or minus 10 percentage points.

(3)

A payout level between 50% and 200% is earned for achieving the cost savings and Our Path Forward — Culture goals.

(1)

A payout level between 40% and 200% is earned for achieving the adjusted non-GAAP operating earnings goals (adjusted for tangible capital). The payout curve would not exceed 100% until we achieved growth over fiscal 2019 adjusted non-GAAP operating earnings of $2,382 million.

(2)

Tangible capital modifies adjusted non-GAAP operating earnings performance by up to or minus 10 percentage points.

(3)

A payout level between 50% and 200% is earned for achieving the cost savings and Our Path Forward — Culture goals.

Fiscal 20182020 Annual Incentive Targets and Payouts

The Compensation Committee annually reviews our named executives’ annual incentive targets as a percentage of base salary. AtAfter the review at the beginning of fiscal 2018,2020, the Committee determined not to maintain our named executives’change the targets as a percentage of base salary at the same levels as fiscal 2017.Messrs. Kaufmann and Crawford and Ms. Mayer. The Compensation Committee set the targets for Messrs. KaufmannHollar and GomezMason at 150% and 100% of their respective base salaries (the same percentages as their predecessors) effective January 1, 2018 in connection with the appointment to their new roles. Prior

The Compensation Committee awarded each eligible named executive his or her fiscal 2020 annual incentive award based on the 120% enterprise funding percentage and an individual performance factor.

www.cardinalhealth.com

Cardinal Health | 2020 Proxy Statement    34


Back to becoming Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Kaufmann’s target was 100%.Contents

Name

Target

(Percent of

Base Salary)

 

Target

Amount

($)

 

Actual

Amount

($)

 

Actual

(Percent

of Target)

Kaufmann

(1)

 

(1)

 

1,518,780

(1)

(1)

Barrett

150

 

2,031,559

 

2,072,190

 

102

Gomez

(1)

 

(1)

 

387,356

(1)

(1)

Giacomin

100

 

697,055

 

853,195

 

122

Morford

85

 

497,425

 

608,848

 

122

Morrison

80

 

424,285

 

432,771

 

102

Casey

100

 

744,521

 

 

(1)

Actual amounts for Messrs. Kaufmann and Gomez reflect the different roles they held during the fiscal year.

Name

Target

(% of Base Salary)

 

Target

Amount

($)

 

Actual

Amount

($)

 

Actual

(% of Target)

 

Kaufmann

150

 

1,929,918

 

2,547,492

 

132

 

Hollar

100

 

124,317

(1)

149,180

(1)

120

 

Crawford

100

 

721,653

 

909,283

 

126

 

Mason

96

(2)

491,639

(2)

586,348

(2)

119

(2)

Mayer

85

(3)

465,885

(3)

559,061

(3)

120

(3)

(1)

Mr. Hollar’s target and actual amounts reflect the prorated portion of his fiscal 2020 annual incentive from when he joined us in April 2020.

(2)

Mr. Mason’s target and actual amounts reflect the different base salaries, annual incentive targets and funding percentages attributable to the different roles he held during the fiscal year.

(3)

Ms. Mayer’s target was increased to 90% effective June 22, 2020 just prior to the fiscal year-end and her fiscal 2020 award was prorated to reflect this change.

Mr. Kaufmann’s annual incentive was based on strong enterprise performance, including growing non-GAAP operating earnings despite the negative impact of COVID-19, and his successful transition intoexcellent individual performance. Among the Chief Executive Officer role, includingfactors the Compensation Committee considered in evaluating his individual performance were his strong efforts in establishing and leading an executive team with new finance and Medical segment leaders. He also was instrumental in launching the comprehensive review of our business and its initial workstreams. His final incentive award reflects his target as Chief Financial Officer during the first halfleadership of the fiscal yearcompany’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic, progress made in Our Path Forward culture initiatives, continued integration of his leadership team, his continued excellent working relationship with the Board, and as Chief Executive Officer during the second half.his prioritization of diversity and inclusion.

Mr. Barrett’sHollar’s prorated annual incentive was based on enterprise performance as well as theand his swift and successful transition of the Chief Executive Officer role to Mr. Kaufmann and Mr. Barrett’s advocacy work on healthcare policy.onboarding since joining us in April 2020.

Mr. Gomez’s annual incentive was based on his successful transition into the Chief Financial Officer role and his efforts in building out his finance leadership team with critical talent. He also assumed a key leadership role in our comprehensive business review. His final incentive award reflects his target as Chief Financial Officer — Medical Segment and that segment’s performance during the first half of the fiscal year, and his target as Chief Financial Officer and enterprise performance during the second half.

Mr. Giacomin’s annual incentive was based on his efforts toward the successful divestiture of our China distribution business, which he led, as well as his strong transition into his new role leading our Medical segment. In that role, he installed new segment leaders and was instrumental in overseeing the initial action steps taken to stabilize the Cordis business.

Mr. Morford’s annual incentive was based on his continued strong leadership of our overall legal and compliance programs in a rapidly evolving landscape, as well as his efforts overseeing the legal and compliance aspects of the Patient Recovery business integration and his work on the successful leadership transitions.

Ms. Morrison’sCrawford’s annual incentive was based on enterprise performance as well as her effortsand his leadership of the Pharmaceutical segment, whose segment profit exceeded expectations, with above-expectations generic pharmaceutical program performance. Mr. Crawford also showed strong leadership of his segment in leading the projectface of COVID-19 and made strong contributions to integrate systems within the recently-acquired Patient Recovery business.company’s progress on diversity and inclusion. He also was instrumental in the progress the Pharmaceutical segment made in Our Path Forward culture initiatives.

Mr. Caseydeparted fromMason’s annual incentive was based on enterprise performance and his leadership of the companyMedical segment, stepping in February 2018early in the fiscal year to lead initiatives underway to drive longer-term growth. Under his leadership, the segment significantly overachieved its cost savings target. He also managed the segment through the challenges of COVID-19 and the surgical gown recall and made strong contributions to the company’s progress on diversity and inclusion. He also was instrumental in the progress the Medical segment made in Our Path Forward culture initiatives.

Ms. Mayer’s annual incentive was based on enterprise performance, her performance leading our legal and compliance functions, and her assuming responsibility mid-year for our quality function. Ms. Mayer also managed her functions through the challenges of COVID-19 and the surgical gown recall and was instrumental in the progress her functions made in Our Path Forward culture initiatives.

Long-Term Incentive Compensation

For fiscal 2020, long-term incentive awards were delivered 60% in PSUs and 40% in RSUs. As noted earlier, even with the unexpected negative impact of COVID-19 (approximately $100 million), we did not receive anadjust either our PSU performance goals or results to remove this impact.

Fiscal 2020 Long-Term Incentive Grants

The Compensation Committee annually reviews our named executives’ long-term incentive targets. At the beginning of fiscal 2020, based primarily on market data, the Committee increased Mr. Kaufmann’s target to $10.0 million (from $9.0 million) and Ms. Mayer’s target to $1.75 million. The Compensation Committee set Mr. Hollar’s target at $2.5 million when he joined us and Mr. Mason’s target at $2.25 million when he was promoted.

The following table shows the long-term incentive awards made in the fiscal 2020 annual grant to the named executives at the time.

Name

Fiscal 2020

Long-Term Incentive

Target

($)

 

Fiscal 2020 Annual Grant Awards

 

 

RSUs

($)

 

Target

PSUs

($)

 

 

Total

($)

Kaufmann

10,000,000

 

 

4,000,000

 

6,000,000

 

10,000,000

Crawford

2,750,000

 

 

1,100,000

 

1,650,000

 

2,750,000

Mason

2,250,000

 

 

900,000

 

1,350,000

 

2,250,000

Mayer

1,750,000

 

 

700,000

 

1,050,000

 

1,750,000

In May 2020, when he joined us as Chief Financial Officer, we provided Mr. Hollar with initial long-term incentive payout.grants of $1.0 million in PSUs and $1.0 million in RSUs. These grants and his cash sign-on bonus were intended to address compensation he forfeited when he left his prior employer.

 

www.cardinalhealth.com

Cardinal Health|20182020 Proxy Statement30    35


Back to Contents

Long-Term Incentive Compensation

For fiscal 2018, we equally weighted our long-term incentive grants between PSUs, stock options and RSUs. We may adjust annual grants from target to reflect individual performance, retention or succession planning. As discussed later in this section, we made changes to our long-term incentive mix for the fiscal 2019 annual grant.

Fiscal 2016-20182018-2020 PSU Payouts

We had noIn August 2020, the Compensation Committee certified the payout level of the PSUs granted for the fiscal 2016 through fiscal 2018 performance cycle (the “Fiscal 16-18 PSUs”). Actual performance in non-GAAP EPS compound annual growth rate (“CAGR”), excluding the benefits of U.S. tax reform, and average annual dividend yield was 3.1%, below the threshold performance of 7.0% required for a payout.

The following table shows the target and earned Fiscal 16-18 PSUs for our named executives other than Mr. Gomez and Ms. Morrison, who were not named executives when these grants were made, but also earned no shares.

Name

Target

Number of

Shares

(#)

Number of

Shares

Earned

(#)

Kaufmann

8,900

0

Barrett

37,578

0

Giacomin

8,307

0

Morford

4,747

0

Casey

8,307

0

Fiscal 2018 Long-Term Incentive Grants

Name

Fiscal 2018

Annual Grant

Target

($)

 

Fiscal 2018 Actual Grants

Stock

Options

($)

 

 

RSUs

($)

 

Target

PSUs

($)

 

 

Total

($)

Kaufmann

(1)

 

950,000

(1)

3,950,000

(1)

950,000

(1)

5,850,000

Barrett

9,500,000

 

3,166,667

(2)

3,166,667

(2)

3,166,667

(2)

9,500,001

Gomez

(3)

 

163,750

(3)

1,163,750

(3)

131,000

(3)

1,458,500

Giacomin

2,850,000

 

950,000

 

1,950,000

(4)

950,000

 

3,850,000

Morford

1,550,000

 

594,167

 

594,167

 

516,667

 

1,705,001

Morrison

1,200,000

 

400,000

(5)

400,000

(5)

400,000

(5)

1,200,000

Casey

2,850,000

 

950,000

(6)

950,000

(6)

950,000

(6)

2,850,000

(1)

Mr. Kaufmann’s fiscal 2018 annual grant was made while in his former role when he had target of $2.85 million. In addition to his annual grant, he received $3.0 million in RSUs in connection with his appointment to Chief Executive Officer. In November 2017, the Compensation Committee set his target at $8.0 million.

(2)

Mr. Barrett received $9.5 million in long-term incentive awards consistent with the target value in his employment agreement. A prorated portion of these awards will vest when he retires at the Annual Meeting and he will forfeit the remainder.

(3)

Mr. Gomez’s fiscal 2018 annual grant was made while in his former role. In addition to his annual grant, he received $1.0 million in RSUs in connection with his appointment to Chief Financial Officer. In November 2017, the Compensation Committee set his target at $1.75 million.

(4)

In addition to his annual grant, Mr. Giacomin received $1.0 million in RSUs in connection with his appointment to Chief Executive Officer — Medical Segment.

(5)

A prorated portion of these awards vested when Ms. Morrison retired in August 2018 and she forfeited the remainder. These amounts do not include the value of previously-granted awards that were modified in connection with her retirement.

(6)

Mr. Casey forfeited these grants following his departure from the company in February 2018.

Fiscal 2018-2020 PSU Grants

When granting PSUs for the fiscal 2018 through fiscal 2020 performance cycle (the “Fiscal 18-20 PSUs”). The Fiscal 18-20 PSUs were earned based on the average of the adjusted non-GAAP EPS payout level for each of the three fiscal years in the performance period, as adjusted by a relative TSR modifier.

Goal

Fiscal

Year

Threshold

($)

Target

($)

Maximum

($)

Actual

($)

Payout

Level

(%)

Adjusted non-GAAP EPS(1)

2018

4.70

5.00

5.30

4.57

0

2019

5.20

5.40

5.60

5.28

70

2020

5.49

5.70

5.91

5.45

0

3-year average payout level

23

TSR modifier(2)

 

Below 20th percentile

Final payout level

 

 

 

 

19

(1)

The Compensation Committee set absolute goals for the first year of the performance period and the following annual growth goals for the second and third years: 4% at threshold, 8% at target and 12% at maximum. Achieving threshold performance results in a 50% payout level, achieving target performance results in a 100% payout level, and achieving maximum performance results in a 200% payout level.

(2)

The TSR modifier decreases the payout by 20% if TSR is below the 20th percentile of the S&P 500 Health Care Index and increases it by 20% if TSR is above the 80th percentile of the index.

The following table shows the target and earned Fiscal 18-20 PSUs for those named executives who had received this grant.

Name

Target

Number of Shares

(#)

Number of Shares

Earned

(#)

Kaufmann

14,301

2,717

Mason

2,258

429

Mayer

2,258

429

Fiscal 2020-2022 PSU Grants

When granting PSUs for the fiscal 2020 through fiscal 2022 performance cycle (the “Fiscal 20-22 PSUs”), the Compensation Committee made a changechanged its approach to payouts in each of three annual periodssetting adjusted non-GAAP EPS goals and added a modifier based on TSR relative to the Standard & Poor’s (“S&P”) 500 Healthcare Index. A payout level between 50%new strategic measures for cost savings and 200% is earned for each annual period based on achievingculture.

(dollars in millions)

Weighting

Threshold

(50%)

Target

(100%)

Maximum

(200%)

Adjusted non-GAAP EPS

70%

95% of cumulative EPS goal

100% of cumulative EPS goal

110% of cumulative EPS goal

Cost savings

20%

$150

$300

$500

Our Path Forward — Culture

10%

No change in leadership score

2 pp increase in leadership score

10 pp increase in leadership score

TSR modifier(1)

 

 

 

 

(1)

The TSR modifier decreases the payout by 20% if TSR is below the 20th percentile of the S&P 500 Health Care Index and increases it by 20% if TSR is above the 80th percentile of the index.

EPSgoal.Adjusted non-GAAP EPS of $4.70 at threshold, $5.00 at target and $5.30 at maximum forremains the first year and pre-established growth goals over the prior fiscal year’s non-GAAP EPS for the second and third years. The TSR modifier is then applied to the three-year average payout level, which decreases the payout by 20% if TSR is below the 20th percentile of the peer group and increases it by 20% if TSR is above the 80th percentile of the peer group.

The Compensation Committee aligned the non-GAAP EPS target for the first year of the Fiscal 18-20 PSUs with the Board-approved budget and has indicated that it intends to exclude the benefits of U.S. tax reform when evaluating fiscal 2018 performance for the named executives’ awards, resulting in below-threshold performance. The Compensation Committee believes that the earnings growth measures for the second and third years provide very challenging goals.

The Compensation Committee retained non-GAAP EPS as the primary PSU performance measure because itnon-GAAP EPS is one of our primary measures of operating performance and is an important measure used by the investment community to evaluate our performance. The EPS goal is a three-year cumulative goal, which is the sum of annual targets set by the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee adoptedset the adjusted non-GAAP EPS target for fiscal 2020 at $5.00 to align with the Board-approved budget. The target was consistent with our public EPS guidance range issued at the beginning of fiscal 2020.

The Compensation Committee changed its EPS goal-setting approach to address significant healthcare industry uncertainties that the company has been facing. These uncertainties have made setting appropriate three-year goals very challenging. The Compensation Committee will continue to evaluate its goal-setting approach, especially in light of the COVID-19 pandemic; when it made the change, to payouts in each of three annual periods to better address significant industry-wide challenges and uncertainties.the Committee viewed it as temporary.

Strategicgoals.The Compensation Committee added a three-year cost savings measure based on an annual run rate in cost savings projects implemented before the end of fiscal 2022. The Compensation Committee set the three-year cost savings target to align with our internal and publicly announced five-year goal of more than $500 million. The Committee also added an Our Path Forward — Culture measure (see pages 23 and 24 for a discussion of Our Path Forward) focused on a leadership score improvement from our employee engagement surveys.

TSRmodifier.A relative TSR modifier based on its goal of linkingmeasured over a portion ofthree-year period continues to link this long-term incentive compensation directly to our relative shareholder returns, a recommendation by its consultant and feedback from shareholders. The Compensation Committee selectedreturns. We use the S&P 500 HealthcareHealth Care Index as the peer group because it is an objective, widely available index with broad representation in the healthcare sector.

Cardinal HealthOperatingcashflowthreshold. |2018 Proxy Statement31


BackOperating cash flow must exceed net earnings for the first two years of the performance period for any of the Fiscal 20-22 PSUs to Contentsvest, regardless of whether the other goals are achieved.

We describe how we calculate these measures in more detail under “Annual Cash Incentive and PSU Performance“Performance Measure Calculations” beginning on page 40. We do not disclose the non-GAAP EPS goals for the second and third annual periods of the Fiscal 18-20 PSUs because it is competitively sensitive information. We will disclose the goals after the end of the three-year performance period.43.

Fiscal 2019 Program Change

As part of its annual review of our long-term incentive program, the Compensation Committee changed our long-term incentive mix for the fiscal 2019 annual grant, increasing the proportion of PSUs to 60% and eliminating stock options for named executives. The Compensation Committee made the decision after considering factors such as market data, emerging best practices, incentive and retentive value of awards, the recommendation of its compensation consultant and shareholder feedback.

Other Elements of Compensation

401(k) Savings and Deferred Compensation Plans

Our 401(k) Savings Plan and DCP allow most of our U.S.-based employees based in the United States to accumulate value on a tax-deferred basis and allow us to be competitive in recruiting and retaining talent. Our DCP permits certain management employees, including the named executives, to defer payment and taxation of a portion of their salary and annual incentive compensation into a variety of different investment alternatives. We make matching contributions subject to limits discussed under “Deferred Compensation” on page 43.46. We also may make additional contributions to the 401(k) Savings Plan and DCP on the same basis for all employees. Named executives also may elect to defer payment and taxation of PSUs and RSUs.

www.cardinalhealth.com

Cardinal Health | 2020 Proxy Statement    36


Back to Contents

Other Benefits and Perquisites

The Compensation Committee encourages use of our corporate aircraft for the personal travel of our Chief Executive Officer and Executive Chairman of the Board asbecause it increases thehis time available for business purposes and enhances his safety and security. The Compensation Committee has set each of Messrs. Kaufmann and Barrett’ssecurity, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic. Mr. Kaufmann’s fiscal 2020 personal travel allowance at $150,000 per fiscal year. They dowas $150,000. He does not receive tax reimbursement for any imputed income associated with personal travel. Both Messrs.Mr. Kaufmann and Barrett havehas an aircraft time-sharing agreement, under which theyhe may reimburse us for incremental costs when they usehe uses the aircraft for personal travel. Reimbursed travel does not count against their allowances.his allowance.

Relocation assistance is an important tool for us to recruit talent. We provided Mr. Hollar a $200,000 lump sum payment for relocation. Our offer letter agreement with Mr. Hollar allows us to recover the full relocation payment if he voluntarily leaves the company during the first year following his start date and 50% of it if he leaves during the second year following his start date.

Severance and Change of Control Benefits

We discussUnder our limited severance payments and benefits in detail under “Potential Payments on Termination of Employment or Change of Control” beginning on page 45. We do not have any agreements to provide change-of-control excise tax gross-ups.

Mr. Casey, our former Chief Executive Officer — Medical Segment, left the company in February 2018. He did not receive severance and was not retirement-eligible upon his departure. Accordingly, he did not receive a fiscal 2018 annual incentive payout and forfeited his unvested long-term incentive awards.

The Board, upon the recommendation of the Compensation Committee, adopted aBoard-adopted Senior Executive Severance Plan (the “Severance Plan”), which plan will be effective as of October 1, 2018 and under which our named executives (other than Mr. Barrett) will beare eligible for severance benefits under certain circumstances. Under the Severance Plan,Specifically, if

if prior to a change of control or following the second anniversary of a change of control, we terminate a named executive without “cause,”cause, or

during the two-year period commencing upon a change of control (the “change of control period”), we terminate a named executive without “cause”cause, or a named executive resigns for “goodgood reason,

then, the named executive will receive:

in the case of the Chief Executive Officer, cash severance equal to 2.0 times (or 2.5 times, if the termination occurs during the change of control period) the sum of annual base salary and target bonus;

in the case of other named executives, cash severance equal to 1.5 times (or 2.0 times, if the termination occurs during the change of control period) the sum of annual base salary and target bonus; and

a prorated annual bonus for the year of termination based on actual performance (or the greater of target performance and actual performance if the termination occurs during the change of control period) and up to 18 months of health insurance premiums.

Receipt of these amounts is conditioned upon execution of a general release and compliance with certain restrictive covenants.

During fiscal 2020, the Compensation Committee amended the definition of “Termination for Cause” under the Severance Plan to include committing fraud or theft or violating theStandardsofBusinessConduct or any other written company policy.

We believe that the Severance Plan is competitive with market practices and provides appropriate levels of compensation andunder standard terms and conditions related to executive separations. These benefits are an important component of our compensation packages designed to attract and retain top caliber talent in senior leadership roles and define terms and conditions of separation events. The Compensation Committee consulted with its compensation consultant before recommending the Severance Plan to the Board.

Retirement Benefits

At retirement, Mr. Barrett, like other company retirees, will be eligible for a prorated fiscal 2019 annual incentive award, prorated vesting of his long-term incentive awards and continued exercisability of vested stock options for their full term.

www.cardinalhealth.com

Cardinal Health|2018 Proxy Statement32


Back to Contents

To ensure an orderly transition of Ms. Morrison’s responsibilities, we amended her long-term incentive awardsWe do not have any agreements to provide that upon her retirementchange-of-control excise tax gross-ups. We discuss our severance payments and benefits in August 2018, she received prorated vestingdetail under “Potential Payments on Termination of awards and continued exercisabilityEmployment or Change of vested stock options for their full term, in both cases consistent with benefits that would be provided to retirees under the 2011 LTIP.Control” beginning on page 47.

Our Policies, Guidelines and Practices Related to Executive Compensation

Role of Compensation Committee’s Compensation Consultant

The Compensation Committee engagedhas utilized Korn Ferry Hay Group, Inc. (“Hay Group”) as its independent executive compensation consultant in Februarysince 2018. Prior to that, it had retained Frederic W. Cook & Co., Inc. (“Cook”) as its consultant during fiscal 2018.

The nature and scope of the consultant’s engagement consists primarily of:

participating in meetings of the Compensation Committee;

providing compensation data on the Comparator Group; and

providing advice and recommendations related to compensation for our executive officers, the design of our executive compensation program, the composition of our Comparator Group and director compensation.

Early in fiscal 2018, Cook advised the Compensation Committee on compensation decisions made for fiscal 2018 with respect to base salaries and annual long-term incentive awards. Hay Group advised the Compensation Committee with respect to fiscal 2018 annual incentive payouts. The Compensation Committee has made assessments of its compensation consultantsan assessment under the factors set forth in the NYSE rules and concluded that each of Hay Group and Cook wasKorn Ferry is independent and that the firms’firm’s work for the Compensation Committee diddoes not raise any conflicts of interest. In making this assessment, the Committee considered other services that Korn Ferry provides to management.

Role of Executive Officers

Our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Human Resources Officer participate in Compensation Committee meetings to make recommendations regarding program design and compensation amounts, to present performance assessments of the named executives (other than our Chief Executive OfficerOfficer) and Executive Chairman of the Board) and to discuss our financial and operationalcompany performance. The Compensation Committee delegates authority to our executive officers authority to administer equity and incentive compensation plans for participants who are not officers subject to Section 16 of the Exchange Act.

Our Chief Executive Officer reviews performance objectives with the Compensation Committee at the beginning of the fiscal year. At the end of the fiscal year, the Compensation Committee reviews and discusses the performance and compensation of the Chief Executive Officer in executive session and with the Lead Director.Chairman of the Board. The Chief Executive Officer does not participate in decisions regarding his own compensation.

Comparator Group

The Compensation Committee establishes target compensation levels based on a variety of factors, including data from a “Comparator Group” of similarly situated public companies, which helps the Compensation Committee to assess whether our executive pay remains reasonable and competitive in the marketplace. Developed with the assistance of the Compensation Committee’s compensation consultant, our Comparator Group reflects the industry in which we primarily compete for executive talent and includes direct competitors and other companies in the healthcare field. Our Comparator Group also includes air/freight and logistics companies and retailers and because of their similar size and business models.

The following companies comprised the Comparator Group for fiscal 20182020 executive pay decisions:

Cardinal Health | 2020 Proxy Statement    37


Back to Contents

AetnaAbbott Laboratories

CVS HealthDanaher

Owens & Minor

AmerisourceBergen

Express ScriptsFedEx

Quest DiagnosticsStryker

Anthem

FedExHenry Schein

Sysco

Baxter International

Henry ScheinJohnson & Johnson

Thermo Fisher ScientificTarget

Becton Dickinson

HumanaKroger

United Parcel ServiceThermo Fisher Scientific

Boston Scientific

LabCorp

UnitedHealth GroupUnited Parcel Service

CIGNA

McKesson

UnitedHealth Group

CVS Health

Medtronic

Walgreens Boots Alliance

The Compensation Committee, working with its compensation consultant, periodically reviews the group’s composition to ensure that the companies remain relevant for comparison purposes. The Compensation Committee useduses the following screening criteriakey guidelines when it reviewedreviews the Comparator Group’s composition prior to fiscal 2018:with the assistance of Korn Ferry:

revenue ranging fromfirm size (firms generally falling in the range of 0.2 to 22.0 times our annual revenue;

market capitalization ranging fromrevenue and 0.2 to 55.0 times our market capitalization;capitalization);

inclusion in the peer group of 5 or more of the other companies in our Comparator Group;industry;

business model; and

inclusion in our Global Industry Classification Standard (GICS) sub-industry group, Health Care Equipmentother secondary considerations, such as talent market, customer base and Services.market presence.

At the time of the review, ourOur revenue wasis in the top quintile of the Comparator Group whileand our market capitalization wasis in the fourthbottom quintile.

Our Compensation Committee compares total direct compensation (base salary plus annual and long-term incentives)incentive) against the 50th percentilemedian of the Comparator Group as a reference point in setting target compensation levels. In addition to competitive market data, the Compensation Committee also considers internal pay equity and an executive’s experience, and scope of responsibility, individual performance, potential, and unique or hard-to-replace skills, as well as retention considerations.

In May 2018, the Compensation Committee again reviewed the Comparator Group’s composition with the assistance of Hay Group and, after considering various factors, made several changes effective for fiscal 2019. The Compensation Committee added Abbott Laboratories, Danaher, Johnson & Johnson, Medtronic and Stryker to better reflect our investments in the Medical segment, including Cordis and the Patient Recovery business, and added Kroger and Target as companies generally similar in size to us and operating in related businesses. It removed Aetna and Express Scripts, which are being acquired, and also removed Humana and Quest Diagnostics.

Cardinal Health|2018 Proxy Statement33


Back to Contents

Risk Assessment of Compensation Programs

Management has assessed our compensation programs and concluded that our compensation policies and practices do not create risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on Cardinal Health. This risk assessment included reviewing the design and operation of our compensation programs, identifying and evaluating situations or compensation elements that could raise more significant risks and evaluating other controls and processes designed to identify and manage risk. The Compensation Committee reviewed and discussed the risk assessment and Hay Groupalong with Korn Ferry reviewed the risk assessment and concurred with management’s conclusion.

CFO Offer Letters

Jason Hollar joined us as in April 2020 and became Chief Financial Officer on May 26, 2020. Mr. Hollar’s offer letter set his initial base salary and annual and long-term incentive targets. To address compensation forfeited at his former employer, the offer letter provided for Mr. Hollar to receive initial long-term incentive grants of $1.0 million in PSUs and $1.0 million in RSUs and a $1.55 million cash sign-on bonus. The offer letter also provided for a $200,000 lump sum payment for relocation. Under the terms of the offer letter, Mr. Hollar must repay 100% of the sign-on bonus and the relocation payment if he voluntarily leaves the company during the first year following his start date and 50% of it if he leaves during the second year following his start date.

David Evans served as our interim Chief Financial Officer from September 1, 2019 until May 25, 2020. Mr. Evans’ offer letter provided him with monthly cash compensation during his time of employment with a minimum duration of five months. In his interim role, he did not participate in our annual or long-term incentive award programs or our Severance Plan.

We discuss the terms of Messrs. Hollar’s and Evans’ offer letters in more detail under “CFO Offer Letters” on page 41.

Stock Ownership Guidelines

We have stock ownership guidelines to align the interests of executive officers and directors with the interests of our shareholders. The guidelines specify a dollar value (expressed as a multiple of salary or cash retainer) of shares that executive officers and directors must accumulate and hold while serving in these positions.

 

Multiple of Base

Salary/Annual

Cash Retainer

Chief Executive Officer

6x

Chief Financial Officer and Segment Chief Executive Officers

4x

Other executive officers

3x

Non-management directors

5x

We count common shares, RSUs and phantom shares held through the DCP under the stock ownership guidelines. Executive officers and directors must retain 100% of the net after-tax shares received under any equity awards until they satisfy the required ownership levels.

Non-GAAP Financial Measures

Our primary annual incentive and PSU performance measures are based on the same non-GAAP financial measures that we use internally for planning and evaluating our performance and present externally in our earnings materials and SEC reports. We adjust these non-GAAP financial measures to exclude some items that are included in our GAAP measures, such as restructuring and employee severance costs, amortization and other acquisition-related costs, impairments and gain or loss on disposal of assets and net litigation recoveries or charges. We make these adjustments primarily because they are not part of our ongoing operations or included in our financial planning, or they relate to events that may have occurred in prior or multiple periods or their timing or amount is inherently unpredictable.

We excluded the following charges and gains, among others, from our non-GAAP financial measures during relevant periods:

www.cardinalhealth.com

Cardinal Health | 2020 Proxy Statement    38


Back to Contents

pre-tax charge of $5.63 billion ($5.14 billion after tax or $17.54 per share) during fiscal 2020 related to opioid litigation(1); our long-standing practice has been to exclude litigation charges like this from our non-GAAP financial measures;

pre-tax gain of $579 million ($493 million after tax or $1.68 per share) during fiscal 2020 related to completion of the divestiture of our remaining equity interest in naviHealth; and

transitional tax benefits of U.S. tax reform during fiscal 2018, 2019 and 2020, including a $936 million ($2.97 per share) benefit in fiscal 2018.

We explain the adjustments to our non-GAAP financial measures and provide a reconciliation to GAAP measures in Annex A.

When determining the payout level for the Fiscal 18-20 PSUs, we removed the positive impact of a benefit from a change in U.S. federal rate of $135 million ($0.43 per share) that was reflected in our fiscal 2018 non-GAAP financial measures.

In addition, the negative impact of COVID-19, which we estimate had a net negative impact on operating earnings of approximately $100 million, was reflected in our fiscal 2020 non-GAAP financial measures and, as noted earlier, we did not adjust either our annual incentive or PSU performance goals or results to remove this impact.

Potential Impact on Compensation from Executive Misconduct (“Clawbacks”)

Our incentive plan2011 LTIP and equity award agreements provide that we may require repayment of cash incentives and gains realized under equity awards and cancel outstanding equity awards in specified instances of executive misconduct, including misconduct causing a financial statement restatement or a material violation of law or of our Standards of Business Conduct that causes material financial harm to us.us.

We will disclose publicly the incentive compensation forfeitures or repayments from our executive officers if required by law or if we have already disclosed publicly the underlying event triggering the forfeiture or repayment and the disclosure would not violate any individual’s privacy rights, is not likely to result in or exacerbate any existing or threatened employee, shareholder or other litigation, arbitration, investigation or proceeding against us, and is not otherwise prohibited.

These clawback provisions support our compliance and risk management programs. We discuss thesethe provisions in more detail under “Potential Impact on Compensation from Executive Misconduct (“Clawbacks”)” on page 40.45.

Hedging and Pledging Shares

Our Board has adopted a policy prohibiting all employees and directors from entering into short sales, publicly traded options, puts and calls, forward sale contracts and other swap, hedging or derivative transactions relating to our securities. The Board also has adopted a policy prohibiting our executive officers and directors from holding our securities in margin accounts or pledging our securities as collateral for a loan.

Equity Grant Practices

The Compensation Committee typically approves the annual equity grant in August of each year and sets August 15 as the grant date. The Compensation Committee expects the annual grant date to follow the release of earnings for the prior fiscal year in early August, without regard to whether we are aware of material nonpublic information.

Equity Dilution Practices

Our fiscal 20182020 annual equity run rate was 1.1%0.92%. We calculate our equity run rate as the total number of shares subject to equity awards granted in the fiscal year divided by the weighted average number of our common shares outstanding during the fiscal year.

Tax Matters

Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code (“Code”) limits our ability to take a tax deduction for non-performance-based compensation in excess of $1 million paid in fiscal 2018 to our Chief Executive Officer and three other most highly compensated executive officers (other than the Chief Financial Officer). “Performance-based” compensation was excepted from this limit, so we generally structured our incentive compensation arrangements in a manner intended to comply with these tax rules. The Compensation Committee has, however, always maintained the flexibility to pay nondeductible incentive compensation as it determines in its business judgment.

Human Resources and Compensation Committee Report

We have reviewed and discussed the foregoing Compensation Discussion and Analysis with management. Based on that review and discussion, we have recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this proxy statement and in Cardinal Health’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2018.2020.

Submitted by the Human Resources and Compensation Committee of the Board.

David P. King, Chairman
Carrie S. Cox, Chairman
Calvin Darden
Patricia A. Hemingway Hall
Nancy Killefer



(1)

As disclosed in our fiscal 2020 Form 10-K, pharmaceutical wholesale distributors, including us, have been named as defendants in over 3,000 lawsuits relating to the distribution of prescription opioid pain medications. These lawsuits also name pharmaceutical manufacturers, retail pharmacy chains and other entities as defendants. Approximately 2,800 of these lawsuits have been filed by counties, municipalities, cities and political subdivisions in various federal, state, and other courts. In October 2019, we agreed in principle to a global settlement framework with a leadership group of state attorneys general that is designed to resolve all pending and future opioid lawsuits and claims by states and political subdivisions and includes, among other things, a cash component, under which we would pay up to $5.56 billion over 18 years. In connection with this and with an October 2019 settlement with two Ohio counties, we recorded a total pre-tax charge of $5.63 billion ($5.14 billion after tax or $17.54 per share) during fiscal 2020. Because loss contingencies are inherently unpredictable and unfavorable developments or resolutions can occur, the assessment is highly subjective and requires judgments about future events. We regularly review these opioid litigation matters to determine whether our accrual is adequate. The amount of ultimate loss may differ materially from this accrual. We continue to strongly dispute the allegations made in these lawsuits and reaching an agreement in principle on a global settlement framework is not an admission of liability or wrongdoing.

 

www.cardinalhealth.com

Cardinal Health|20182020 Proxy Statement34    39


Back to Contents

Executive Compensation Tables

The table below summarizes fiscal 20182020 compensation for:

theour Chief Executive Officer, who also served asOfficer;

our current and former Chief Financial Officer through December 31, 2017;Officers; and

the Executive Chairman of the Board, who also served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer through December 31, 2017;

the Chief Financial Officer, who was promoted to that position effective January 1, 2018;

theour three other most highly compensated executive officers as of June 30, 2018,2020, the end of our fiscal 2018; and

Mr. Casey, who was an executive officer through February 2, 2018 and would have been one of the three other most highly compensated executive officers as of June 30, 2018.2020.

Summary Compensation Table

Name and

Principal Position

Year

Salary

($)

Bonus

($)

Stock

Awards ($)(1)

 

Option

Awards

($)(2)

 

Non-Equity

Incentive Plan

Compensation

($)

Change in

Pension

Value and

Nonqualified

Deferred

Compensation

Earnings

($)

All Other

Compensation

($)(3)

 

Total

($)

Michael C. Kaufmann(4)

Chief Executive Officer and Former Chief Financial Officer

2018

955,699

4,900,007

(5)

948,690

 

1,518,780

100,404

 

8,423,580

2017

746,438

186,609

1,947,561

 

997,432

 

14,979

 

3,893,019

2016

721,311

1,575,006

 

826,402

 

880,723

27,251

 

4,030,693

George S. Barrett(4)

Executive Chairman of the Board and Former Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

2018

1,354,374

6,333,303

 

3,162,297

 

2,072,190

189,722

 

13,111,886

2017

1,320,000

6,333,255

 

3,166,434

 

165,488

 

10,985,177

2016

1,320,000

6,491,739

 

3,330,665

 

2,386,755

131,928

 

13,661,087

Jorge M. Gomez(4)

Chief Financial Officer

2018

478,149

1,294,742

(6)

163,519

 

387,356

37,527

 

2,361,293

Jon L. Giacomin(4)

Chief Executive Officer — Medical Segment

2018

697,055

2,900,011

(7)

948,690

 

853,195

36,131

 

5,435,082

2017

567,151

141,788

1,900,060

 

949,930

 

14,966

 

3,573,895

2016

542,623

1,400,062

 

701,196

 

602,314

27,770

 

3,273,965

Craig S. Morford

Chief Legal and Compliance Officer

2018

585,205

1,110,842

 

593,341

 

608,848

31,514

 

2,929,750

2017

552,151

117,332

1,033,386

 

516,631

 

14,967

 

2,234,467

2016

531,311

1,620,055

 

420,707

 

576,487

37,579

 

3,186,139

Patricia B. Morrison(8)

Retired Executive Vice President, Customer Support Services and Chief Information Officer

2018

530,356

1,095,811

(9)

734,839

(9)

432,771

30,705

 

2,824,482

Donald M. Casey Jr.(4)

Former Chief Executive
Officer — Medical Segment

2018

440,411

1,900,031

(10)

948,690

(10)

3,051

 

3,292,183

2017

705,014

176,253

1,947,561

 

997,432

 

10,800

 

3,837,060

2016

671,311

1,505,062

 

806,369

 

894,188

22,830

 

3,899,760

(1)

The amounts reported represent the aggregate grant date fair value of PSUs (at target) and RSUs granted during each fiscal year. The amounts reported in each fiscal year do not represent amounts paid to or realized by the named executives. See the Grants of Plan-Based Awards for Fiscal 2018 table on pages 37 and 38 and the accompanying footnotes for information on the grant date fair value of each award granted in fiscal 2018. The value of the PSUs granted during fiscal 2018 assuming achievement of the maximum 200% funding would be: Mr. Kaufmann — $1,900,031; Mr. Barrett — $6,333,303; Mr. Gomez — $262,000; Mr. Giacomin — $1,900,031; Mr. Morford — $1,033,385; Ms. Morrison — $1,368,136; and Mr. Casey — $1,900,031. The named executives may never realize any value from the PSUs.

(2)

The amounts reported represent the grant date fair value of nonqualified stock options granted during each fiscal year and do not represent amounts paid to or realized by the named executives. See the Grants of Plan-Based Awards for Fiscal 2018 table on pages 37 and 38 and the accompanying footnotes for information on the grant date fair value of stock options granted during fiscal 2018 and the assumptions used in determining the grant date fair value. The named executives may never realize any value from these stock options, and to the extent they do, the amounts realized may be more or less than the amounts reported above.

(3)

The elements of compensation included in the “All Other Compensation” column for fiscal 2018 are set forth in the table below.

Name and

Principal Position

Year

Salary

($)

Bonus

($)

 

Stock

Awards

($)

(1) 

Option

Awards

($)

 

Non-Equity

Incentive Plan

Compensation

($)

 

All Other

Compensation

($)

 

Total

($)

Michael C. Kaufmann(2)

Chief Executive Officer

2020

1,286,612

0

 

10,239,990

 

0

 

2,547,492

 

143,033

 

14,217,127

2019

1,193,288

0

 

12,110,701

 

0

 

2,126,439

 

140,576

 

15,571,004

2018

955,699

0

 

4,900,007

 

948,690

 

1,518,780

 

100,404

 

8,423,580

Jason M. Hollar(3)

Chief Financial Officer

2020

124,317

1,550,000

(3)

2,067,619

(3)

0

 

149,180

 

213,137

(3)

4,104,253

Victor L. Crawford

Chief Executive Officer — Pharmaceutical Segment

2020

721,653

0

 

2,815,992

 

0

 

909,283

 

14,250

 

4,461,178

2019

443,014

2,500,000

 

3,095,770

 

0

 

502,378

 

184,660

 

6,725,822

Stephen M. Mason(4)

Chief Executive Officer — Medical Segment

2020

511,749

0

 

2,304,024

 

0

 

586,348

 

21,350

 

3,423,471

Jessica L. Mayer

Chief Legal and Compliance Officer

2020

547,268

0

 

1,792,014

 

0

 

559,061

 

15,859

 

2,914,202

2019

429,856

0

 

2,152,539

 

0

 

364,933

 

19,707

 

2,967,035

David C. Evans(5)

Former interim Chief Financial Officer

2020

2,178,361

0

 

0

 

0

 

0

 

26,850

 

2,205,211

Jorge M. Gomez(6)

Former Chief Financial Officer

2020

65,574

0

 

0

 

0

 

0

 

2,951

 

68,525

2019

593,288

0

 

2,530,734

 

0

 

0

 

26,757

 

3,150,779

2018

478,149

0

 

1,294,742

 

163,519

 

387,356

 

37,527

 

2,361,293

(1)

The amounts reported represent the aggregate accounting value of PSUs (at target) and RSUs granted during each fiscal year. The amounts reported in each fiscal year do not represent amounts paid to or realized by the named executives. See the Grants of Plan-Based Awards for Fiscal 2020 table on page 42 and the accompanying footnotes for information on the accounting value of each award granted in fiscal 2020. The accounting values of the PSUs granted during fiscal 2020 at target are: Mr. Kaufmann — $6,239,994; Mr. Hollar — $1,067,620; Mr. Crawford — $1,716,012; Mr. Mason — $1,404,006; and Ms. Mayer — $1,092,000. The accounting values of the PSUs granted during fiscal 2020 assuming that the highest level of performance conditions will be achieved are: Mr. Kaufmann — $14,975,994; Mr. Hollar — $2,562,308; Mr. Crawford — $4,118,412; Mr. Mason — $3,369,606; and Ms. Mayer — $2,620,800.

(2)

Mr. Kaufmann also served as interim Chief Financial Officer from August 9, 2019 until August 31, 2019.

(3)

Mr. Hollar joined us on April 27, 2020 and became Chief Financial Officer on May 26, 2020. To address compensation forfeited at his former employer, Mr. Hollar received a sign-on bonus of $1,550,000, PSUs with an accounting value of $1,067,620 and RSUs with an accounting value of $1,000,000. He also received a $200,000 lump sum payment for relocation. He must repay the full sign-on bonus and relocation payment if he voluntarily leaves the company during the first year following his start date and 50% of it if he leaves during the second year following his start date.

(4)

Mr. Mason was not previously a named executive.

(5)

Mr. Evans served as interim Chief Financial Officer from September 1, 2019 until May 25, 2020. In his interim role, he received monthly cash compensation of $220,000 during his employment and did not participate in our annual or long-term incentive plans or our Severance Plan.

(6)

Mr. Gomez served as Chief Financial Officer from the beginning of the fiscal year through August 8, 2019, when he left the company.

 

Cardinal Health|

www.cardinalhealth.com2018 Proxy Statement35

Cardinal Health | 2020 Proxy Statement    40


Back to Contents

(4)

Mr. Kaufmann succeeded Mr. Barrett as Chief Executive Officer effective January 1, 2018. Mr. Gomez succeeded Mr. Kaufmann as Chief Financial Officer effective January 1, 2018 and was not previously a named executive. Mr. Giacomin succeeded Mr. Casey as Chief Executive Officer — Medical Segment effective February 5, 2018 following Mr. Casey’s departure from the company.

All Other Compensation

(5)

The amount shown in this column includes RSUs with a grant date fair value of $2,999,976 granted to Mr. Kaufmann in connection with his appointment to Chief Executive Officer.

(6)

The amount shown in this column includes RSUs with a grant date fair value of $999,992 granted to Mr. Gomez in connection with his appointment to Chief Financial Officer.

(7)

The amount shown in this column includes RSUs with a grant date fair value of $999,980 granted to Mr. Giacomin in connection with his appointment to Chief Executive Officer — Medical Segment.

(8)

Ms. Morrison was not previously a named executive.

(9)

The amounts shown in these columns include the incremental fair value of previously granted long-term incentive awards that were modified in connection with Ms. Morrison’s retirement in August 2018. These modifications provided for prorated vesting of awards upon Ms. Morrison’s retirement and continued exercisability of vested stock options for their full term, in both cases consistent with the benefits that would be provided to retirees under the 2011 LTIP.

(10)

Mr. Casey forfeited these awards following his departure from the company in February 2018.

The amounts shown for “All Other Compensation” for fiscal 20182020 include: company contributions to the named executive’s account under our 401(k) plan; company contributions to the named executive’s account under our DCP; and perquisites, in the following amounts:

Name

Company

401(k) Savings

Plan

Contributions

($)

Company

Deferred

Compensation

Plan

Contributions

($)

Perquisites

($)(a)

 

Total

($)

Kaufmann

24,723

10,500

65,181

 

100,404

Barrett

24,723

10,500

154,499

 

189,722

Gomez

27,527

10,000

 

37,527

Giacomin

24,723

11,408

 

36,131

Morford

24,723

6,791

 

31,514

Morrison

24,705

6,000

 

30,705

Casey

3,051

 

3,051

(a)

The amounts shown include the value of perquisites and other personal benefits if the aggregate value exceeded $10,000. Where we report perquisites and other personal benefits, we quantify each perquisite or personal benefit if it exceeds $25,000. The amount reported for Mr. Kaufmann included the incremental cost to us of his personal use of corporate aircraft ($64,313) and home security system monitoring fees. The amount reported for Mr. Barrett included the incremental cost to us of his personal use of corporate aircraft ($149,756), fees paid for services provided to him for legal review of his employment agreement modification and home security system monitoring fees.

We own corporate aircraft and lease other aircraft as needed. We calculate the incremental cost of personal use of corporate aircraft based on the average cost of fuel, average trip-related maintenance costs, crew travel expenses, per flight landing fees, hangar and parking costs and smaller variable costs. Since we use our aircraft primarily for business travel, we do not include fixed costs, such as depreciation, pilot salaries and certain maintenance costs. Messrs. Kaufmann and Barrett each receive up to $150,000 per fiscal year in personal use of corporate aircraft. Neither receives tax reimbursement for any imputed income associated with personal travel. Both Messrs. Kaufmann and Barrett have an aircraft time-sharing agreement, under which they may reimburse us for incremental costs when they use the aircraft for personal travel consistent with Federal Aviation Administration regulations. Reimbursed travel does not count against their personal use allowances.

Name

Company 401(k) Savings

Plan Contributions

($)

Company Deferred

Compensation Plan

Contributions

($)

Perquisites

($)

(1) 

 

Total

($)

Kaufmann

14,250

5,000

123,783

(2)

 

143,033

Hollar

12,825

0

200,312

(3)

 

213,137

Crawford

14,250

0

 

 

14,250

Mason

16,850

4,500

 

 

21,350

Mayer

15,859

0

 

 

15,859

Evans

26,850

0

 

 

26,850

Gomez

0

2,951

 

 

2,951

(1)

The amounts shown include the value of perquisites and other personal benefits if the aggregate value exceeded $10,000. We quantify each reported perquisite or personal benefit if it exceeds $25,000.

(2)

The amount reported for Mr. Kaufmann includes the incremental cost to us of his personal use of corporate aircraft ($121,718), home security system monitoring fees and personal liability insurance coverage. We calculate the incremental cost of personal use of corporate aircraft based on the average cost of fuel, average trip-related maintenance costs, crew travel expenses, per flight landing fees, hangar and parking costs and smaller variable costs. Since we use our aircraft primarily for business travel, we do not include fixed costs, such as depreciation, pilot salaries and certain maintenance costs. For fiscal 2020, Mr. Kaufmann received up to $150,000 in personal use of corporate aircraft. He does not receive tax reimbursement for any imputed income associated with personal travel. He has an aircraft time-sharing agreement, under which he may reimburse us for incremental costs when he uses the aircraft for additional personal travel consistent with Federal Aviation Administration regulations. Reimbursed travel does not count against his personal use allowance.

(3)

The amount reported for Mr. Hollar includes the incremental cost to us of a lump sum payment for relocation ($200,000) and home security system monitoring fees. He must repay 100% of this relocation assistance if he voluntarily leaves the company during the first year following his start date and 50% of it if he leaves during the second year following his start date.

Employment ArrangementsCFO Offer Letters

Mr. Barrett isHollar became our Chief Financial Officer on May 26, 2020. We entered into an offer letter with him in March 2020 providing for:

an annual base salary of $700,000;

a target annual bonus of 100% of his annual base salary prorated from his start date to the only executive officer with an employment agreement. Prior to November 2017, Mr. Barrett’s employment agreement provided that he would serve as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer until our 2018 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, subject to earlier termination. In November 2017, as partend of the succession plans described above, we modified Mr. Barrett’s employment agreement to provide that he will continue to serve as Executive Chairman of the Board until the 2018 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, at which time he will retire from Cardinal Health.

The modified agreement provides that Mr. Barrett will continue to receive the same level of compensation through the date of his retirement. He will receive medical and dental benefits for two years after retirement. He also will receive retirement treatment under our 2011 LTIP, which provides for a prorated fiscal 2019 annual bonus, prorated vesting of his outstandingyear; and

target long-term incentive awards of $2,500,000 for the fiscal 2021 annual grant.

To address compensation forfeited at his former employer, the offer letter provided that Mr. Hollar receive initial long-term incentive grants of $1.0 million in PSUs and continued exercisability of vested stock options for their full term.

In connection with Ms. Morrison’s retirement$1.0 million in August 2018, we entered intoRSUs and a $1.55 million cash sign-on bonus. The offer letter agreement with her thatalso provided for prorated vestinga $200,000 lump sum payment for relocation. Under the terms of outstandingthe offer letter, Mr. Hollar must repay the full sign-on bonus and the relocation payment if he voluntarily leaves the company during the first year following his start date and 50% of it if he leaves during the second year following his start date.

Mr. Evans served as our interim Chief Financial Officer from September 1, 2019 until May 25, 2020. Mr. Evans’ offer letter provided him with monthly cash compensation of $220,000 during his time of employment with a minimum duration of five months. He did not participate in our annual or long-term incentive awards and continued exercisability of vested stock options for their full term, in both cases consistent with the benefits that would be provided to retirees under the 2011 LTIP.award programs or our Severance Plan.

 

www.cardinalhealth.com

Cardinal Health|20182020 Proxy Statement36    41


Back to Contents

Grants of Plan-Based Awards for Fiscal 20182020

The table below supplements our Summary Compensation Table by providing additional information about our plan-based compensation for fiscal 2018.2020.

Name/

Award Type

Grant

Date

Approval

Date

Estimated Potential Payouts

Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan

Awards(1)

Estimated Potential Payouts

Under Equity Incentive Plan

Awards(2)

All Other

Stock

Awards:

Number

of Shares

of Stock

or Units

(#)(3)

All Other

Option

Awards:

Number of

Securities

Underlying

Options

(#)(4)

Exercise

or Base

Price of

Option

Awards

($/Sh)(5)

Grant

Date Fair

Value of

Stock and

Option

Awards

($)(6)

Grant

Date

 

Approval

Date

Estimated Potential Payouts Under

Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards(1)

Estimated Potential Payouts Under

Equity Incentive Plan Awards(2)

All Other

Stock

Awards:

Number

of Shares

of Stock

or Units

(#)(3)

Grant

Date Fair

Value of

Stock

Awards

($)(4)

Threshold

($)

Target

($)

Maximum

($)

Threshold

(#)

Target

(#)

Maximum

(#)

Threshold

($)

Target

($)

Maximum

($)

Threshold

(#)

Target

(#)

Maximum

(#)

Kaufmann

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Annual Incentive

 

496,334

1,240,834

2,481,668

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

771,967

1,929,918

3,859,836

 

PSUs

8/15/2017

 

7,151

14,301

28,602

 

 

 

950,015

8/15/2019

 

8/6/2019

 

 

71,429

142,857

342,857

 

6,239,994

Option

8/15/2017

8/8/2017

 

 

 

70,102

66.43

948,690

RSUs

8/15/2017

8/8/2017

 

 

 

14,301

 

 

950,015

8/15/2019

 

8/6/2019

 

 

95,238

3,999,996

RSUs(7)

11/8/2017

11/5/2017

 

 

 

49,188

 

 

2,999,976

Barrett

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Hollar

 

 

 

 

 

Annual Incentive(5)

 

 

 

 

49,727

124,317

248,634

 

PSUs(6)

5/15/2020

 

3/12/2020

 

 

10,215

20,429

49,030

 

1,067,620

RSUs(6)

5/15/2020

 

3/12/2020

 

 

20,429

1,000,000

Crawford

 

 

 

 

 

Annual Incentive

 

812,624

2,031,559

4,063,118

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

288,661

721,653

1,443,306

 

PSUs

8/15/2017

 

23,835

47,669

95,338

 

 

 

3,166,652

8/15/2019

 

8/6/2019

 

 

19,643

39,286

94,286

 

1,716,012

Option

8/15/2017

8/8/2017

 

 

 

233,673

66.43

3,162,297

RSUs

8/15/2017

8/8/2017

 

 

 

47,669

 

 

3,166,652

8/15/2019

 

8/6/2019

 

 

26,190

1,099,980

Gomez

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mason

 

 

 

 

 

Annual Incentive

 

146,070

365,174

730,348

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

196,656

491,639

983,279

 

PSUs

8/15/2017

 

986

1,972

3,944

 

 

 

131,000

8/15/2019

 

8/6/2019

 

 

16,072

32,143

77,143

 

1,404,006

Option

8/15/2017

8/8/2017

 

 

 

12,083

66.43

163,519

RSUs

8/15/2017

8/8/2017

 

 

 

2,465

 

 

163,750

8/15/2019

 

8/6/2019

 

 

21,429

900,018

RSUs(8)

11/8/2017

11/5/2017

 

 

 

16,396

 

 

999,992

Giacomin

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mayer

 

 

 

 

 

Annual Incentive

 

278,822

697,055

1,394,110

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

186,354

465,885

931,769

 

PSUs

8/15/2017

 

7,151

14,301

28,602

 

 

 

950,015

8/15/2019

 

8/6/2019

 

 

12,500

25,000

60,000

 

1,092,000

Option

8/15/2017

8/8/2017

 

 

 

70,102

66.43

948,690

RSUs

8/15/2017

8/8/2017

 

 

 

14,301

 

 

950,015

8/15/2019

 

8/6/2019

 

 

16,667

700,014

RSUs(9)

2/15/2018

1/19/2018

 

 

 

14,684

 

 

999,980

Morford

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Annual Incentive

 

198,970

497,425

994,850

 

 

 

 

 

 

PSUs

8/15/2017

 

3,889

7,778

15,556

 

 

 

516,693

Option

8/15/2017

8/8/2017

 

 

 

43,844

66.43

593,341

RSUs

8/15/2017

8/8/2017

 

 

 

8,944

 

 

594,150

Morrison

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Annual Incentive

 

169,714

424,285

848,570

 

 

 

 

 

 

PSUs

8/15/2017

 

3,011

6,021

12,042

 

 

 

399,975

Option

8/15/2017

8/8/2017

 

 

 

29,517

66.43

399,454

RSUs

8/15/2017

8/8/2017

 

 

 

6,021

 

 

399,975

PSUs(10)

6/29/2018

 

1,738

3,476

6,952

 

 

 

(11)

PSUs(10)

6/29/2018

 

1,171

2,342

4,684

 

 

 

(11)

Option(10)

6/29/2018

 

 

 

34,158

51.49

61,151

Option(10)

6/29/2018

 

 

 

24,611

71.43

56,778

Option(10)

6/29/2018

 

 

 

21,965

84.27

51,108

Evans

 

 

 

 

Gomez

 

 

 

 

(1)

This information relates to annual cash incentive award opportunities with respect to fiscal 2020 performance. Amounts actually earned under the annual cash incentive awards are reported in the Summary Compensation Table under the “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column.

(2)

“Equity Incentive Plan Awards” are PSUs granted during the fiscal year under our 2011 LTIP. PSUs are eligible to vest based on achieving goals for cumulative adjusted non-GAAP EPS over three annual periods, three-year cost savings and a culture measure over the performance period, with a modifier based on TSR relative to the S&P 500 Health Care Index. A cashflow threshold must be achieved to receive any payout under the PSUs.

(3)

“All Other Stock Awards” are RSUs granted during the fiscal year under our 2011 LTIP that vest ratably over three years and accrue cash dividend equivalents that are payable when, and only to the extent that, the RSUs vest.

(4)

We valued PSUs using a Monte Carlo simulation valuation model, which applies a risk-free interest rate and expected volatility assumptions. The risk-free interest rate is assumed to equal the yield on U.S. Treasury bonds on the grant date with remaining terms consistent with the remaining performance measurement period. Expected volatility is based on the average of historical volatility over a look-back period commensurate with the remaining performance measurement period ending on the grant date and the implied volatility from exchange-traded options as of the grant date. The assumed per-share value was $43.68 for the PSUs granted on August 15, 2019, using a risk-free rate of 1.44% and expected volatility of 31.59%, and $52.26 for the PSUs granted on May 15, 2020, using a risk-free rate of 0.16% and expected volatility of 38.75%. These accounting values differ from the compensation values of PSU awards discussed in Compensation Discussion and Analysis and under “CFO Offer Letters” above.

(5)

Mr. Hollar’s award opportunity was prorated from his start date to the end of the fiscal year.

(6)

Mr. Hollar received these PSUs and RSUs when he joined us as Chief Financial Officer. His sign-on bonus and initial long-term incentive awards were intended to address compensation forfeited at his former employer.

(1)

This information relates to annual cash incentive award opportunities with respect to fiscal 2020 performance. Amounts actually earned under the annual cash incentive awards are reported in the Summary Compensation Table under the “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column.

(2)

“Equity Incentive Plan Awards” are PSUs granted during the fiscal year under our 2011 LTIP. PSUs are eligible to vest based on achieving goals for cumulative adjusted non-GAAP EPS over three annual periods, three-year cost savings and a culture measure over the performance period, with a modifier based on TSR relative to the S&P 500 Health Care Index. A cashflow threshold must be achieved to receive any payout under the PSUs.

(3)

“All Other Stock Awards” are RSUs granted during the fiscal year under our 2011 LTIP that vest ratably over three years and accrue cash dividend equivalents that are payable when, and only to the extent that, the RSUs vest.

(4)

We valued PSUs using a Monte Carlo simulation valuation model, which applies a risk-free interest rate and expected volatility assumptions. The risk-free interest rate is assumed to equal the yield on U.S. Treasury bonds on the grant date with remaining terms consistent with the remaining performance measurement period. Expected volatility is based on the average of historical volatility over a look-back period commensurate with the remaining performance measurement period ending on the grant date and the implied volatility from exchange-traded options as of the grant date. The assumed per-share value was $43.68 for the PSUs granted on August 15, 2019, using a risk-free rate of 1.44% and expected volatility of 31.59%, and $52.26 for the PSUs granted on May 15, 2020, using a risk-free rate of 0.16% and expected volatility of 38.75%. These accounting values differ from the compensation values of PSU awards discussed in Compensation Discussion and Analysis and under “CFO Offer Letters” above.

(5)

Mr. Hollar’s award opportunity was prorated from his start date to the end of the fiscal year.

(6)

Mr. Hollar received these PSUs and RSUs when he joined us as Chief Financial Officer. His sign-on bonus and initial long-term incentive awards were intended to address compensation forfeited at his former employer.

 

Cardinal Health|2018 Proxy Statement37


Back to Contents

Name/

Award Type

Grant

Date

Approval

Date

Estimated Potential Payouts

Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan

Awards(1)

Estimated Potential Payouts

Under Equity Incentive Plan

Awards(2)

All Other

Stock

Awards:

Number

of Shares

of Stock

or Units

(#)(3)

All Other

Option

Awards:

Number of

Securities

Underlying

Options

(#)(4)

Exercise

or Base

Price of

Option

Awards

($/Sh)(5)

Grant

Date Fair

Value of

Stock and

Option

Awards

($)(6)

Threshold

($)

Target

($)

Maximum

($)

Threshold

(#)

Target

(#)

Maximum

(#)

Option(10)

6/29/2018

6/29/2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

21,381

83.19

55,364

Option(10)

6/29/2018

6/29/2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

18,394

66.43

110,984

RSUs(10)

6/29/2018

6/29/2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,222

 

 

157,330

RSUs(10)

6/29/2018

6/29/2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,092

 

 

53,322

RSUs(10)

6/29/2018

6/29/2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,745

 

 

85,208

Casey

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Annual Incentive(12)

 

 

297,808

744,521

1,489,041

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

PSUs(12)

8/15/2017

8/15/2017

 

 

 

7,151

14,301

28,602

 

 

 

950,015

Option(12)

8/15/2017

8/8/2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

70,102

66.43

948,690

RSUs(12)

8/15/2017

8/8/2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

14,301

 

 

950,015

(1)

This information relates to annual cash incentive award opportunities with respect to fiscal 2018 performance. Amounts actually earned under the annual cash incentive awards are reported in the Summary Compensation Table under the “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column.

(2)

“Equity Incentive Plan Awards” are PSUs granted during the fiscal year under our 2011 LTIP. The August 2017 grants and one of Ms. Morrison’s June 2018 modified awards are eligible to vest based on payout levels of non-GAAP EPS in each of three annual periods, with a modifier based on TSR relative to the S&P 500 Healthcare Index. Ms. Morrison’s other June 2018 modified award is eligible to vest after a three-year performance period based on the sum of non-GAAP EPS CAGR and average annual dividend yield. We accrue cash dividend equivalents that are payable when, and only to the extent that, the PSUs vest.

(3)

“All Other Stock Awards” are RSUs granted during the fiscal year under our 2011 LTIP that, unless otherwise noted, vest ratably over three years and accrue cash dividend equivalents that are payable when, and only to the extent that, the RSUs vest.

(4)

“All Other Option Awards” are nonqualified stock options granted during the fiscal year under our 2011 LTIP that, unless otherwise noted, vest ratably over three years and have a term of 10 years.

(5)

The stock options have an exercise price equal to the closing price of our common shares on the NYSE on the grant date (or the original grant date in the case of Ms. Morrison’s modified awards).

(6)

We valued the PSUs and RSUs by multiplying the closing price of our common shares on the NYSE on the grant date by the number of PSUs (at target) and RSUs awarded. We valued the stock options granted on August 15, 2017 utilizing a lattice model with the following assumptions: expected stock option life: 6.94 years; dividend yield: 2.78%; risk-free interest rate: 2.13%; and expected volatility: 24.95%. We valued the stock options granted on June 29, 2018 utilizing a Black-Scholes model with the following assumptions: expected stock option life: between 5.04 and 9.04 years; dividend yield: 3.90%; risk-free interest rate: between 2.74% and 2.85%; and expected volatility: between 24.23% and 30.94%. The amounts reported represent the grant date or incremental fair value and do not represent amounts paid to or realized by the named executives. The named executives may never realize any value from the PSUs or stock options. To the extent they realize value from PSUs or stock options, the amounts realized may be more or less than the amounts reported above.

(7)

These RSUs were granted to Mr. Kaufmann in connection with his appointment to Chief Executive Officer.

(8)

These RSUs were granted to Mr. Gomez in connection with his appointment to Chief Financial Officer.

(9)

These RSUs were granted to Mr. Giacomin in connection with his appointment to Chief Executive Officer — Medical Segment. They vest in full on the first anniversary of the grant date.

(10)

Reflects previously granted long-term incentive awards that were modified in connection with Ms. Morrison’s retirement in August 2018. These modifications provided for prorated vesting of awards upon Ms. Morrison’s retirement and continued exercisability of vested stock options for their full term, in both cases consistent with the benefits that would be provided to retirees under the 2011 LTIP. The amounts shown in the “Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards” column reflect the incremental fair value of these modified awards.

(11)

There was no incremental fair value with respect to these modified awards.

(12)

Mr. Casey forfeited these grants following his departure from the company in February 2018.

www.cardinalhealth.com

Cardinal Health|20182020 Proxy Statement38    42


Back to Contents

2011 Long-Term Incentive Plan

Our key executive employees, including our named executives, are eligible to receive annual cash incentivesincentive awards under our 2011 LTIP. For fiscal 2018, the Compensation Committee established the “qualifying performance criterion” of $900 million in non-GAAP operating earnings. This qualifying performance criterion was intended to allow payments to qualify as performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) of the Code and to be fully tax-deductible by us. The named executives would not have received any payout under the 2011 LTIP unless we achieved this threshold.

As discussed in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, for 70% of the fiscal 2020 annual incentive award payout, the Compensation Committee also set a “performance goal”performance goal of adjusted non-GAAP operating earnings and established a matrix of potential funding percentages based upon achievement of varying levels of earnings, subject to adjustment based on tangible capital performance. The Compensation Committee set additional strategic goals for cost savings and Our Path Forward — Culture for the remaining 30%. Based on performance against these goals, an aggregate funding percentage determines the total pool fornamed executives’ annual incentive awards.awards before applying an individual performance factor. The performance goals established by the Compensation Committee may vary from year to year,year.

The 2011 LTIP provides that the timing of payment of any cash award will occur on or before the 15th day of the third month after the end of the applicable performance period, unless the Compensation Committee exercises its discretion to specify another payment date or to defer payments. The 2011 LTIP also grants the Compensation Committee broad discretion to assess and determine the amounts payable, including how performance was achieved and whether there were inappropriate risks undertaken or conduct by individual participants. In practice, the Compensation Committee has deferred decisions on payment of awards under the annual cash incentive program until fiscal year-end audited financial statements are substantially complete to support its assessment of the company’s and named executives’ performance. The Compensation Committee retains discretion to adjust upward or downward the amount payable under a cash award, including, if appropriate, to support the company’s clawback policy. It also may make annual incentive awards to named executives even if we do not achieve the minimumthreshold performance goal.goals.

Under our 2011 LTIP, we also may grant stock options, stock appreciation rights, stock awards and other stock-based awards to employees. During fiscal 2018,2020, we granted PSUs nonqualified stock options and RSUs under the plan2011 LTIP to our named executives, as shown in the Grants of Plan-Based Awards for Fiscal 20182020 table on pages 37page 42 and 38.discussed in Compensation Discussion and Analysis. The plan2011 LTIP provides for “double-trigger” accelerated vesting in connection with a change of control, under which the vesting of awards will accelerate only if there is a qualifying termination within two years after the change of control or if the surviving entity does not provide qualifying replacement awards.

During fiscal 2018, we addedWe have one-year minimum vesting provisions toin our 2011 LTIP. Under these provisions, stock options and stock awards are subject to a one-year vesting condition, except upon a change of control or the death or disability of the grantee or for up to an aggregate not to exceed 5% of the total number of shares provided for in the 2011 LTIP.

PSUs granted under the 2011 LTIP settle after a performance period by the issuance of shares, which may be a fraction or multiple of the target number of PSUs subject to an award. Issuance of the shares is subject to both continued employment and the achievement of performance goals established by the Compensation Committee (which may vary from award to award).

For the Fiscal 18-20 PSUs, the Compensation Committee established the “qualifying performance criterion” of non-GAAP EPS for our fiscal year ending June 30, 2020 equal to or greater than $1.00 per share. This qualifying performance criterion was intended to allow the PSUs to be performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) of the Code and to be fully tax-deductible by us.

As discussed in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the Compensation Committee also established a “performance goal”performance goals for the Fiscal 18-2020-22 PSUs based on payout levels ofcumulative adjusted non-GAAP EPS in each ofover three annual periods with afor 70% of the payout and cost savings and Our Path Forward — Culture strategic goals for the remaining 30%. A modifier based on TSR relative to the S&P 500 Healthcare Index.Health Care Index is then applied to determine the final payout. A participant cancashflow threshold must be achieved to receive 50% of target PSUs if we attain threshold performance and up to 200% of target PSUs for over-performance before the 20% TSR modifier is applied.any payout.

We describe how we calculate the measures referred to in this section under “Annual Cash Incentive and PSU Performance“Performance Measure Calculations” below.

Performance Measure Calculations

Cardinal Health|2018 Proxy Statement39Our primary annual incentive and PSU performance measures are based on the same non-GAAP financial measures that we use internally for planning and evaluating our performance and present externally in our earnings materials and SEC reports. We adjust these non-GAAP financial measures to exclude some items that are included in our GAAP measures, such as restructuring and employee severance costs, amortization and other acquisition-related costs, impairments and gain or loss on disposal of assets and net litigation recoveries or charges. We make these adjustments primarily because they are not part of our ongoing operations or included in our financial planning, or they relate to events that may have occurred in prior or multiple periods or their timing or amount is inherently unpredictable. We explain the adjustments to our non-GAAP financial measures and provide a reconciliation to GAAP measures in Annex A. See also “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” in Compensation Discussion and Analysis beginning on page 38 for a discussion of certain adjustments we made during relevant periods.

Cardinal Health | 2020 Proxy Statement    43


Back to Contents

Annual Cash Incentive and PSU Performance Measure Calculations

Award

Performance Measure

Calculation

Annual Cash Incentive

Adjusted non-GAAP operating earnings with a modifier based on tangible capital

Adjusted non-GAAP operating earnings is non-GAAPNon-GAAP operating earnings(1) adjusted to exclude annual cash incentive expense to the extent below or above target performance, incremental contributions to the 401(k) Savings Plan and DCP, PSU expense to the extent below or above budgeted performance, and income or expense related to the performance of our DCP assets that is included within distribution, selling, general and administrative expenses in our consolidated statement of earnings.(2)

Tangible capital is modifier

12-month average of total assets, less total liabilities (other than interest-bearing long-term obligations), goodwill and other intangibles, net, and cash and equivalents.(2)

Fiscal2016-18PSUsCost savings

Sum of non-GAAP EPS CAGR and average annual dividend yieldAnnual cost savings achieved through cost optimization initiatives.

Our Path Forward — Culture

Non-GAAP EPS CAGR is non-GAAP EPS(3)Rating between 1 and 5 based on achievement of goals set for the last fiscal yearperformance management (percentage of theemployees entering goals and performance period dividedconversation acknowledgments into our internal tracking system by non-GAAP EPS for the last fiscal year preceding the performance period; the quotient is then raised to the powerset deadline), change management (percentage of one divideddesignated leaders completing change management playbooks) and diversity and inclusion (percentage of employees completing required unconscious bias training by the number of years in the performance period.

Average annual dividend yield is the sum of all cash dividends paid per share during a performance period divided by the number of years in the performance period; the quotient is then divided by our closing share price on the grant date.set deadline).

Fiscal 2018-2018-20 PSUs

Payout levels ofThree-year average adjusted non-GAAP EPS in each
payout level

Sum of threethe annual periods, with a modifierpayout levels based on TSR relative to the S&P 500 Healthcare Index

Payout levelsachievement of adjusted non-GAAP EPS(3) goals in each of the three annual periods isfiscal years during the sum of the payout level based on non-GAAP EPS(3)in the first year, the payout level based on non-GAAP EPSin the second year and the payout level based on non-GAAP EPSin the third year,performance period, divided by three. A payout level is earned for each annual periodfiscal year based on achieving set levels of adjusted non-GAAP EPS for the first fiscal year and growth over the prior fiscal year’s adjusted non-GAAP EPS for the second and third fiscal years.

TSR is cumulative total shareholder returnmodifier

Cumulative TSR for the performance period assuming dividend reinvestment and determined based on the average daily closing stock prices for the 20 trading days ending immediately prior to the first day and last day of the three-year performance period, respectively. TSR percentile rank references companies in the S&P 500 Health Care Index on both the first and the last day of the performance period and any company that filed for bankruptcy during the performance period is assigned a -100% TSR.

Fiscal20-22PSUs

Adjusted non-GAAP EPS payout level

Level of achievement of cumulative adjusted non-GAAP EPS goal, which is the sum of the annual adjusted non-GAAP EPS goals established at the beginning of each of the three fiscal years during the performance period.

Cost savings

Attaining a specified annual run rate in the aggregate in cost savings projects implemented before the completion of the performance period.

Our Path Forward — Culture

Maintaining or increasing a leadership score in the final employee engagement pulse survey completed during the performance period from the baseline score from the company’s most recent bi-annual full engagement survey.

TSR modifier

Same calculation as used for Fiscal 18-20 PSUs.

Cash flow threshold

Operating cash flow(4) exceeding net earnings(5) for the first two years of the performance period.

(1)

Non-GAAP operating earnings is operating earningsearnings/(loss) excluding LIFO charges/(credits), surgical gown recall costs, state opioid assessment related to prior fiscal years, restructuring and employee severance, amortization and other acquisition-related costs, impairments and (gain)/loss on disposal of assets, and litigation (recoveries)/charges.charges, net.

(2)

For fiscal 2018, we excluded an incremental 401(k) plan contribution from the adjusted non-GAAP operating earnings calculation. Historically, we have also excluded the results of acquired or divested businesses from the adjusted non-GAAP operating earnings and tangible capital calculations if they were not included in our Board-approved annual budget. During fiscal 2018, we did not adjust for the divestiture of the China distribution business, so the divestiture had an unbudgeted negative effect on the fiscal 2018 annual incentive payout. The Compensation Committee also may make other adjustments for purposes of determining whether we achieved our performance goals, although none were made for fiscal 2018.goals.

(3)

Non-GAAPAdjusted non-GAAP EPS is adjusted non-GAAP net earnings attributable to Cardinal Health, Inc. divided by diluted weighted average shares outstanding. Non-GAAPAdjusted non-GAAP net earnings attributable to Cardinal Health, Inc. is net earningsearnings/(loss) attributable to Cardinal Health, Inc. excluding LIFO charges/(credits), surgical gown recall costs, state opioid assessment related to prior fiscal years, restructuring and employee severance, amortization and other acquisition-related costs, impairments and (gain)/loss on disposal of assets, litigation (recoveries)/charges, net, and loss on early extinguishment of debt, gain on sale of equity interest in naviHealth, any federal, state or other assessments or taxes on the distribution or sale of opioids and any unbudgeted taxes, tariffs, assessments or other items, whether benefit or expense, that individually exceed $20 million, tax benefits and expenses associated with each net of tax, andthe foregoing items, transitional tax benefit, net, related to the U.S. Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017. For purposes of the PSUs,such other adjustments that the Compensation Committee may approve adjustments to how we calculate non-GAAP net earnings attributable to Cardinal Health, Inc. to reflect a change by us to the definition of that measure as presented to investors, exceptional acquisitions or divestitures, changes in accounting principles or other exceptional items that are not reflective of our operating performance. We adjusted

(4)

Operating cash flow is net cash provided by operating activities as shown on the Fiscal 16-18 PSUsconsolidated statements of cash flows for the relevant fiscal year, with adjustments that the Compensation Committee may approve to remove all benefitsaddress the comparability of U.S. tax reform.items within operating cash flow and net earnings.

(5)

Net earnings is GAAP net earnings/(loss) attributable to Cardinal Health, Inc.

In addition

www.cardinalhealth.com

Cardinal Health | 2020 Proxy Statement    44


Back to determining incentive compensation, we use the non-GAAP financial measures referenced above internally to evaluate our performance, evaluate the balance sheet, and engage in financial and operational planning because we believe that these measures provide additional perspective on and, in some circumstances are more closely correlated to, the performance of our underlying, ongoing business. We provide these non-GAAP financial measures to investors as supplemental metrics to assist readers in assessing the effects of items and events on our financial and operating results on a year-over-year basis and in comparing our performance to that of our competitors.Contents

Potential Impact on Compensation from Executive Misconduct (“Clawbacks”)

The 2011 LTIP authorizes us to seek repayment of incentive awards fromif a participant if that participantnamed executive engages in misconduct that causes or contributes to the need to restate previously-filedpreviously filed financial statements and the payment was based on financial results that we subsequently restate. In addition, incentivecash awards granted under the 2011 LTIP may be subject to repayment if a participant commits misconduct, includingnamed executive engaged in a breachmaterial violation of law or of our Standards of Business Conduct or violation of an applicable non-competition or confidentiality agreement.and this conduct caused material financial harm to us.

Under our 2011 LTIP and stock option, PSU and RSU agreements, unpaid annual cash incentive awards, unexercised stock options, unvested PSUs and RSUs and certain vested PSUs and RSUs are forfeited if the holdera named executive breaches our Standards of Business Conduct,, discloses confidential information, commits fraud, gross negligence or willful misconduct, solicits business or our employees, disparages us or engages in competitive actions while employed by Cardinal Health or during a set time period after termination of employment. We also may require the holdera named executive to repay the gross gain realized from any stock option exercises or the value of theannual cash incentive awards paid or PSUs and RSUs settled within a set time period prior to such conduct.

www.cardinalhealth.com

Cardinal Health|2018 Proxy Statement40


Back to Contents

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End for Fiscal 20182020

The table below shows the number of shares underlying exercisable and unexercisable stock options and unvested PSUs and RSUs held by our named executives on June 30, 2018. Mr. Casey departed from the company in February 2018 and had no outstanding equity awards to report in the table.2020.

Name

Option Awards

Stock Awards

Option

Grant

Date

Number of

Securities

Underlying

Unexercised

Options

(#)

Exercisable

 

Number of

Securities

Underlying

Unexercised

Options

(#)

Unexercisable(1)

 

Option

Exercise

Price

($/Sh)

Option

Expiration

Date

Number of

Shares or

Units of

Stock That

Have Not

Vested

(#)

 

Market Value

of Shares or

Units of Stock

That Have Not

Vested

($)(2)

Equity Incentive

Plan Awards:

Number of Unearned

Shares, Units or

Other Rights That

Have Not Vested

(#)(3)

 

Equity Incentive Plan

Awards: Market or

Payout Value of

Unearned Shares,

Units or Other Rights

That Have Not Vested

($)(2)(3)

Kaufmann

8/15/2011

76,909

 

 

41.60

8/15/2021

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8/15/2012

96,291

 

 

39.81

8/15/2022

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8/15/2013

68,316

 

 

51.49

8/15/2023

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8/15/2014

53,698

 

 

71.43

8/15/2024

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8/15/2015

31,378

 

15,689

 

84.27

8/15/2025

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8/15/2016

19,885

 

39,770

 

83.19

8/15/2026

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8/15/2017

 

70,102

 

66.43

8/15/2027

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

74,196

(4)

3,622,991

12,861

(5)

628,003

Barrett

8/15/2011

308,302

 

 

41.60

8/15/2021

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8/15/2012

330,738

 

 

39.81

8/15/2022

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8/15/2013

279,770

 

 

51.49

8/15/2023

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8/15/2014

212,020

 

 

71.43

8/15/2024

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8/15/2015

126,463

 

63,232

 

84.27

8/15/2025

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8/15/2016

63,126

(6)

126,254

(6)

83.19

8/15/2026

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8/15/2017

(6)

233,673

(6)

66.43

8/15/2027

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

86,199

(7)

4,209,097

42,868

(8)

2,093,244

Gomez

8/15/2014

5,862

 

 

71.43

8/15/2024

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8/15/2015

5,730

 

2,865

 

84.27

8/15/2025

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8/15/2016

2,872

 

5,746

 

83.19

8/15/2026

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8/15/2017

 

12,083

 

66.43

8/15/2027

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

20,612

(9)

1,006,484

1,774

(10)

86,624

Giacomin

8/15/2012

26,166

 

 

39.81

8/15/2022

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8/15/2013

21,349

 

 

51.49

8/15/2023

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8/15/2014

14,650

 

 

71.43

8/15/2024

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

9/15/2014

24,037

 

 

74.96

9/15/2024

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8/15/2015

26,624

 

13,312

 

84.27

8/15/2025

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8/15/2016

18,938

 

37,876

 

83.19

8/15/2026

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8/15/2017

 

70,102

 

66.43

8/15/2027

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

39,368

(11)

1,922,339

12,861

(12)

628,003

Morford

8/15/2011

12,795

 

 

41.60

8/15/2021

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8/15/2012

37,444

 

 

39.81

8/15/2022

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8/15/2013

39,038

 

 

51.49

8/15/2023

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8/15/2014

25,570

 

 

71.43

8/15/2024

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8/15/2015

15,974

 

7,987

 

84.27

8/15/2025

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8/15/2016

10,299

 

20,600

 

83.19

8/15/2026

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8/15/2017

 

43,844

 

66.43

8/15/2027

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

19,426

(13)

948,572

6,995

(14)

341,566

Name

Option Awards

Stock Awards

Option

Grant

Date

Number of

Securities

Underlying

Unexercised

Options

(#)

Exercisable

 

Number of

Securities

Underlying

Unexercised

Options

(#)

Unexercisable

(1) 

Option

Exercise

Price

($/Sh)

Option

Expiration

Date

Number of

Shares or

Units of

Stock That

Have Not

Vested

(#)

 

Market Value

of Shares or

Units of Stock

That Have Not

Vested

($)

(2) 

Equity Incentive Plan

Awards: Number of

Unearned Shares,

Units or Other Rights

That Have Not

Vested

(#)

(3) 

Equity Incentive Plan

Awards: Market or

Payout Value of

Unearned Shares,

Units or Other Rights

That Have Not Vested

($)

(2) 

Kaufmann

8/15/2011

76,909

 

0

 

41.60

8/15/2021

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8/15/2012

96,291

 

0

 

39.81

8/15/2022

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8/15/2013

68,316

 

0

 

51.49

8/15/2023

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8/15/2014

53,698

 

0

 

71.43

8/15/2024

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8/15/2015

47,067

 

0

 

84.27

8/15/2025

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8/15/2016

59,655

 

0

 

83.19

8/15/2026

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8/15/2017

46,734

 

23,368

 

66.43

8/15/2027

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

203,521

(4)

10,621,761

 

503,357

(5)

26,270,202

 

Hollar

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

20,429

(6)

1,066,190

 

40,858

(7)

2,132,379

 

Crawford

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

43,542

(8)

2,272,457

 

130,628

(9)

6,817,475

 

Mason

8/15/2014

4,688

 

0

 

71.43

8/15/2024

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8/15/2015

5,990

 

0

 

84.27

8/15/2025

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8/15/2016

8,971

 

0

 

83.19

8/15/2026

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8/15/2017

8,117

 

4,059

 

66.43

8/15/2027

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

27,481

(10)

1,434,233

 

80,387

(11)

4,195,398

 

Mayer

8/15/2012

884

 

0

 

39.81

8/15/2022

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8/15/2013

1,627

 

0

 

51.49

8/15/2023

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8/15/2014

2,285

 

0

 

71.43

8/15/2024

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8/15/2015

1,947

 

0

 

84.27

8/15/2025

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8/15/2016

6,279

 

0

 

83.19

8/15/2026

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8/15/2017

7,379

 

3,690

 

66.43

8/15/2027

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

31,596

(12)

1,648,995

 

89,973

(13)

4,695,691

 

 

Cardinal Health|2018 Proxy Statement41


Back to Contents

Name

Option Awards

Stock Awards

Option

Grant

Date

Number of

Securities

Underlying

Unexercised

Options

(#)

Exercisable

 

Number of

Securities

Underlying

Unexercised

Options

(#)

Unexercisable(1)

 

Option

Exercise

Price

($/Sh)

Option

Expiration

Date

Number of

Shares or

Units of

Stock That

Have Not

Vested

(#)

 

Market Value

of Shares or

Units of Stock

That Have Not

Vested

($)(2)

Equity Incentive

Plan Awards:

Number of Unearned

Shares, Units or

Other Rights That

Have Not Vested

(#)(3)

 

Equity Incentive Plan

Awards: Market or

Payout Value of

Unearned Shares,

Units or Other Rights

That Have Not Vested

($)(2)(3)

Morrison

8/15/2013

34,158

 

 

51.49

8/15/2023

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8/15/2014

24,611

 

 

71.43

8/15/2024

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8/15/2015

14,643

 

7,322

 

84.27

8/15/2025

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8/15/2016

7,974

(15)

15,948

(15)

83.19

8/15/2026

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8/15/2017

(15)

29,517

(15)

66.43

8/15/2027

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

14,555

(16)

710,721

5,415

(17)

264,414

(1)

Unless otherwise indicated, these stock options vest 33% on the first, second and third anniversaries of the grant date.

(2)

The market value is the product of $48.83, the closing price of our common shares on the NYSE on June 29, 2018, and the number of unvested stock awards.

(3)

Based on current performance in accordance with the SEC rules, PSUs for the fiscal 2017 through fiscal 2019 performance cycle (“Fiscal 17-19 PSUs”) and Fiscal 18-20 PSUs assume payout at threshold. There was no payout of Fiscal 16-18 PSUs because performance fell below threshold, so no Fiscal 16-18 PSUs are reflected in the table.

(4)

Reflects RSUs that vest as follows: 11,618 shares on August 15, 2018; 16,396 shares on November 8, 2018; 8,623 shares on August 15, 2019; 16,396 on November 8, 2019; 4,767 shares on August 15, 2020; and 16,396 shares on November 8, 2020.

(5)

Reflects 5,710 Fiscal 17-19 PSUs and 7,151 Fiscal 18-20 PSUs.

(6)

A prorated portion of these stock options will vest when Mr. Barrett retires after the Annual Meeting and he will forfeit the remainder.

(7)

Reflects RSUs that vest as follows: 41,730 shares on August 15, 2018; 28,579 shares on August 15, 2019; and 15,890 shares on August 15, 2020. A prorated portion of these RSUs will vest when Mr. Barrett retires at the Annual Meeting and he will forfeit the remainder.

(8)

Reflects 19,033 Fiscal 17-19 PSUs and 23,835 Fiscal 18-20 PSUs. In connection with his retirement, Mr. Barrett will receive a prorated portion of these PSUs if and when they pay out and will forfeit the remainder.

(9)

Reflects RSUs that vest as follows: 1,994 shares on August 15, 2018; 5,465 shares on November 8, 2018; 1,400 shares on August 15, 2019; 5,465 on November 8, 2019; 822 shares on August 15, 2020; and 5,466 shares on November 8, 2020.

(10)

Reflects 788 Fiscal 17-19 PSUs and 986 Fiscal 18-20 PSUs.

(11)

Reflects RSUs that vest as follows: 11,343 shares on August 15, 2018; 14,684 shares on February 15, 2019; 8,574 shares on August 15, 2019; and 4,767 shares on August 15, 2020.

(12)

Reflects 5,710 Fiscal 17-19 PSUs and 7,151 Fiscal 18-20 PSUs.

(13)

Reflects RSUs that vest as follows: 6,713 shares on August 15, 2018; 4,679 shares on November 15, 2018; 5,052 shares on August 15, 2019; and 2,982 shares on August 15, 2020.

(14)

Reflects 3,106 Fiscal 17-19 PSUs and 3,889 Fiscal 18-20 PSUs.

(15)

A prorated portion of these stock options vested when Ms. Morrison retired in August 2018 and she forfeited the remainder.

(16)

Reflects RSUs that vest as follows: 5,133 shares on August 15, 2018; 3,805 shares on February 15, 2019; 3,610 shares on August 15, 2019; and 2,007 shares on August 15, 2020. A prorated portion of these RSUs vested when Ms. Morrison retired in August 2018 and she forfeited the remainder.

(17)

Reflects 2,404 Fiscal 17-19 PSUs and 3,011 Fiscal 18-20 PSUs. In connection with her retirement, Ms. Morrison will receive a prorated portion of these PSUs if and when they pay out and will forfeit the remainder.

www.cardinalhealth.com

Cardinal Health|20182020 Proxy Statement42    45


Back to Contents

Name

Option Awards

Stock Awards

Option

Grant

Date

Number of

Securities

Underlying

Unexercised

Options

(#)

Exercisable

Number of

Securities

Underlying

Unexercised

Options

(#)

Unexercisable

(1)

Option

Exercise

Price

($/Sh)

Option

Expiration

Date

Number of

Shares or

Units of

Stock That

Have Not

Vested

(#)

Market Value

of Shares or

Units of Stock

That Have Not

Vested

($)

(2)

Equity Incentive Plan

Awards: Number of

Unearned Shares,

Units or Other Rights

That Have Not

Vested

(#)

(3)

Equity Incentive Plan

Awards: Market or

Payout Value of

Unearned Shares,

Units or Other Rights

That Have Not Vested

($)

(2)

Evans

Gomez

(1)

These stock options vest 33% on the first, second and third anniversaries of the grant date.

(2)

The market value is the product of $52.19, the closing price of our common shares on the NYSE on June 30, 2020, and the number of unvested stock awards.

(3)

Fiscal 18-20 PSUs are actual amounts that vested based on our performance over the performance period. Based on current performance in accordance with the SEC rules, PSUs for the fiscal 2019 through fiscal 2021 performance cycle (“Fiscal 19-21 PSUs”) and Fiscal 20-22 PSUs assume payout at maximum.

(4)

Reflects RSUs that vest as follows: 58,925 shares on August 15, 2020; 15,562 shares on November 8, 2020; 21,231 shares on June 28, 2021; 54,825 shares on August 15, 2021; 21,232 shares on June 28, 2022; and 31,746 shares on August 15, 2022.

(5)

Reflects 2,717 Fiscal 18-20 PSUs, 214,926 Fiscal 19-21 PSUs and 285,714 Fiscal 20-22 PSUs.

(6)

Reflects RSUs that vest as follows: 6,809 shares on May 15, 2021; 6,810 shares on May 15, 2022; and 6,810 shares on May 15, 2023.

(7)

Reflects 40,858 Fiscal 20-22 PSUs.

(8)

Reflects RSUs that vest as follows: 8,730 shares on August 15, 2020; 8,676 shares on November 15, 2020; 8,730 shares on August 15, 2021; 8,676 shares on November 15, 2021; and 8,730 shares on August 15, 2022.

(9)

Reflects 52,056 Fiscal 19-21 PSUs and 78,572 Fiscal 20-22 PSUs.

(10)

Reflects RSUs that vest as follows: 10,583 shares on August 15, 2020; 9,755 shares on August 15, 2021; and 7,143 shares on August 15, 2022.

(11)

Reflects 429 Fiscal 18-20 PSUs, 15,672 Fiscal 19-21 PSUs and 64,286 Fiscal 20-22 PSUs.

(12)

Reflects RSUs that vest as follows: 8,920 shares on August 15, 2020; 2,984 shares on March 15, 2021; 8,168 shares on August 15, 2021; 2,984 shares on March 15, 2022; 5,556 shares on August 15, 2022; and 2,984 shares on March 15, 2023.

(13)

Reflects 429 Fiscal 18-20 PSUs, 39,544 Fiscal 19-21 PSUs and 50,000 Fiscal 20-22 PSUs.

Option Exercises and Stock Vested for Fiscal 20182020

The table below shows stock options that were exercised, and PSUs and RSUs that vested, during fiscal 20182020 for each of our named executives.

Name

Option Awards

 

 

Stock Awards

Number of Shares

Acquired on

Exercise

(#)

Value Realized

on Exercise

($)

 

 

Number of Shares

Acquired on

Vesting

(#)(1)

Value Realized

on Vesting

($)

Kaufmann

 

 

38,106

2,549,124

Barrett

 

 

90,971

6,073,224

Gomez

4,475

72,782

 

 

6,159

405,485

Giacomin

 

 

20,400

1,363,149

Morford

 

 

17,724

1,137,924

Morrison

 

 

15,553

1,040,525

Casey

158,879

3,882,442

 

 

33,978

2,275,375

(1)

This column represents the vesting during fiscal 2018 of PSUs granted during fiscal 2015 for the fiscal 2015 through fiscal 2017 performance cycle and RSUs granted during fiscal 2015, 2016 and 2017. The number of shares acquired on vesting includes the following PSUs and RSUs deferred at the election of the named executive, net of required withholding: Mr. Morford — 6,995 PSUs and 7,705 RSUs; and Mr. Casey — 6,742 RSUs. See “Deferred Compensation” below for a discussion of deferral terms.

Name

Option Awards

 

 

Stock Awards

Number of Shares

Acquired on

Exercise

(#)

Value Realized

on Exercise

($)

 

 

Number of Shares

Acquired on

Vesting

(#)

(1) 

Value Realized

on Vesting

($)

Kaufmann

 

 

71,559

 

3,404,699

Hollar

 

 

 

Crawford

 

 

8,676

 

487,938

Mason

 

 

10,763

 

452,046

Mayer

 

 

10,132

 

442,314

Evans

 

 

 

Gomez

 

 

 

(1)

This column represents the vesting during fiscal 2020 of PSUs granted during fiscal 2018 to Mr. Mason and Ms. Mayer before they were named executives and RSUs granted to named executives during fiscal 2017, 2018 and 2019.

Deferred Compensation

Our DCP permits certain management employees, including the named executives, to defer between 1% and 50% of base salary and between 1% and 80% of incentive compensation. In addition, we may make additional matching and non-matching contributions to the deferred balances of participants. We make matching contributions on amounts deferred under the DCP from compensation in excess of $275,000,$285,000, but not in excess of $375,000,$385,000, at the same rate as contributions are matched under the 401(k) Savings Plan. We also may credit participants’ accounts with additional company contributions in the same amount as company contributions made to the 401(k) Savings Plan based on a percentage of fiscal year compensation in excess of $275,000,$285,000, but not in excess of $375,000.$385,000.

www.cardinalhealth.com

Cardinal Health | 2020 Proxy Statement    46


Back to Contents

Each participant may direct the investment of his or her DCP account by selecting notional investment options that generally track publicly available mutual funds and investments and by periodically changing investment elections as the participant deems appropriate. We pay participants’ deferred balances in cash upon retirement, termination from employment, death or total disability in a single lump sum or annual installment payments over a period of five or ten years. The DCP does not qualify under Section 401(a) of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”) and is exempt from many of the provisions of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 as a “top hat” plan for a select group of management or highly compensated employees.

Apart from the DCP, a named executive also may defer receipt of shares that otherwise would be issued on the date that PSUs and RSUs vest until after the named executive is no longer employed by Cardinal Health or until a fixed future date.

Cardinal Health|2018 Proxy Statement43


Back to Contents

Nonqualified Deferred Compensation in Fiscal 20182020

The table below provides information regarding the named executives’ accounts under our DCP and deferred share arrangements. References to deferred shares in the table below include both PSUs and RSUs.

Name/Award Type

Executive

Contributions

in Last FY

($)(1)(2)

Cardinal

Health

Contributions

in Last FY

($)(2)

Aggregate

Earnings

in Last FY

($)(3)

Aggregate

Withdrawals/

Distributions

($)

Aggregate

Balance

at Last FYE

($)(4)

Kaufmann

 

 

 

 

 

DCP

118,554

4,954

269,660

3,643,214

Deferred shares

(652,518)

1,095,306

Barrett

 

 

 

 

 

DCP

140,447

4,000

164,280

2,697,035

Deferred shares

Gomez

 

 

 

 

 

DCP

171,045

4,000

70,605

1,542,129

Deferred shares

Giacomin

 

 

 

 

 

DCP

97,217

8,000

208,611

2,096,609

Deferred shares

Morford

 

 

 

 

 

DCP

226,427

800

197,471

1,860,815

Deferred shares

934,348

(2,082,467)

3,849,904

Morrison

 

 

 

 

 

DCP

16,505

3,000

31,830

514,214

Deferred shares

Casey

 

 

 

 

 

DCP

150,591

8,388

593,123

Deferred shares

447,871

(2,063,849)

3,594,376

(1)

The DCP amounts shown include salary and fiscal 2017 cash incentive awards deferred during fiscal 2018. DCP amounts do not include the following amounts deferred from the fiscal 2018 cash incentive awards that were paid in fiscal 2019: Mr. Kaufmann — $91,127; Mr. Gomez — $96,839; and Mr. Giacomin — $127,979.

(2)

DCP amounts included as contributions in the table and also reported as fiscal 2018 compensation in the Summary Compensation Table of this proxy statement are as follows: Mr. Kaufmann — $63,611; Mr. Barrett — $144,447; Mr. Gomez — $175,045; Mr. Giacomin — $91,038; Mr. Morford — $15,550; and Ms. Morrison — $19,505.

(3)

We calculate the aggregate DCP earnings based upon the change in value of the investment options selected by the named executive during the year. Aggregate deferred shares earnings are calculated based upon the change in their total value from the first day of the fiscal year (or the vesting date, if later) to the last day of the fiscal year.

(4)

DCP amounts included in the aggregate balance at June 30, 2018 in the table and also reported as fiscal 2017 and 2016 compensation in the Summary Compensation Table of this proxy statement are as follows: Mr. Kaufmann — $96,510; Mr. Barrett — $272,000; Mr. Giacomin — $160,827; and Mr. Morford — $39,639.

Name/Award Type

Executive

Contributions

in Last FY

($)

(1)(2) 

Cardinal

Health

Contributions

in Last FY

($)

(2) 

Aggregate

Earnings

in Last FY

($)

(3) 

Aggregate

Withdrawals/

Distributions

($)

 

Aggregate

Balance

at Last FYE

($)

(4) 

Kaufmann

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

DCP

222,516

 

8,000

 

1,487

 

 

4,297,270

 

Deferred shares

 

 

114,174

 

 

1,170,674

 

Hollar

 

 

 

 

 

Crawford

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

DCP

 

3,000

 

166

 

 

3,166

 

Deferred shares

 

 

 

 

 

Mason

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

DCP

43,443

 

3,000

 

20,502

 

 

278,659

 

Deferred shares

 

 

 

 

 

Mayer

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

DCP

 

3,000

 

3,452

 

 

236,688

 

Deferred shares

 

 

 

 

 

Evans

 

 

 

 

 

Gomez

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

DCP

10,385

 

7,500

 

86,194

 

 

1,909,739

 

Deferred shares

 

 

 

 

 

www.cardinalhealth.com
(1)

Cardinal Health|The DCP amounts shown include salary and fiscal 2019 cash incentive awards deferred during fiscal 2020.

(2)

DCP amounts included as contributions in the table and also reported as fiscal 2020 compensation in the Summary Compensation Table of this proxy statement are as follows: Mr. Kaufmann — $78,346; Mr. Mason — $43,443; and Mr. Gomez — $14,885.

(3)

We calculate the aggregate DCP earnings based upon the change in value of the investment options selected by the named executive during the year. Aggregate deferred share earnings are calculated based upon the change in their total value from the first day of the fiscal year (or the vesting date, if later) to the last day of the fiscal year.

(4)

DCP amounts included in the aggregate balance at June 30, 2020 in the table and also reported as fiscal 2019 and 2018 Proxy Statement44compensation in the Summary Compensation Table of this proxy statement are as follows: Mr. Kaufmann — $136,930; and Mr. Gomez — $235,968.


Back to Contents

Potential Payments on Termination of Employment or Change of Control

In many cases, our named executives are eligible to receive benefits after a termination of employment or change of control under the 2011 LTIP. The various payments and benefits that would be provided to the named executives under the 2011 LTIP are discussed in the table below.

Cash Awards

Long-Term Incentive Awards

TerminationforCause(1)

We may require repayment if a participant commits misconduct, including a breach of our StandardsofBusinessConduct.

We may cancel unexercised stock options and unvested stock awards and require repayment of proceeds realized from vested awards for a specified period.

InvoluntaryTermination
withoutCause

If involuntarily terminated without cause after the beginning of the final quarter of a performance period, the executive receives a prorated incentive payment based upon the length of employment during that performance period; if terminated earlier, there is no right to an incentive payment.

If involuntarily terminated without cause after the end of a performance period, the executive receives his PSUs as if he had remained employed through the settlement date; otherwise unvested equity awards are forfeited and the executive must exercise vested stock options within 90 days.

TerminationDue
toRetirement(2)

Prorated incentive payment based upon the length of employment during the performance period.

Stock options and RSUs held for at least six months vest, prorated based upon the length of employment during the vesting period, on an accelerated basis and outstanding stock options remain exercisable until the expiration of option term.

PSUs held for at least six months vest on the original vesting date, subject to achievement of the performance goals, but the amount is prorated based upon the length of employment during the performance period.

TerminationDuetoDeathorDisability(3)

Prorated incentive payment based upon the length of employment during the performance period.

Stock options and RSUs held for at least six months vest on an accelerated basis and stock options remain exercisable until expiration of option term.

PSUs held for at least six months vest on the original vesting date, subject to achievement of the performance goals.

ChangeofControl(4)

Awards vest on an accelerated basis only if a qualifying termination occurs within two years after a change of control (including a “good reason” termination by the executive or an involuntary termination without cause) or the surviving entity does not provide qualifying replacement awards.

Awards vest on an accelerated basis only if a qualifying termination occurs within two years after a change of control (including a “good reason” termination by the executive or an involuntary termination without cause) or the surviving entity does not provide qualifying replacement awards.

In general, if employment terminates within two years after change of control, stock options remain exercisable until the earlier of three years from termination or expiration of option term.

The number of PSUs received is based on the actual performance before the change of control and expected performance for the remainder of the performance period.

(1)

“Termination for cause” generally means termination of employment for fraud or intentional misrepresentation, embezzlement, misappropriation, conversion of assets or the intentional violation of our written policies or procedures.

(2)

“Retirement” means termination of employment (other than by death or disability or a termination for cause) after attaining either age 55 and at least 10 years of continuous service or, for awards granted after July 1, 2017, age 60 and at least five years of continuous service. Plan participants also qualify for retirement for awards granted after July 1, 2017 after they attain either age 53 and at least eight years of continuous service or age 59 and at least four years of continuous service, are terminated by us without cause and enter into a separation agreement with us.

(3)

“Disability” exists when an executive who is under the regular care of a physician is continuously unable to substantially perform his job or to be employed in any occupation for which the executive is qualified by education, training or experience.

(4)

A “change of control” generally occurs when:

a person or group acquires 30% or more of Cardinal Health’s outstanding common shares or voting securities, subject to limited exceptions;

during any two-year period, individuals who as of the beginning of such two-year period constituted the Board cease for any reason to constitute at least a majority of the Board, unless the replacement directors are approved as described in the 2011 LTIP;

there is a consummation of a reorganization, merger, consolidation or sale or other disposition of all or substantially all of Cardinal Health’s assets or another business combination unless: after the transaction all or substantially all the owners of Cardinal Health’s outstanding common shares or voting securities prior to the transaction own more than 50% of such securities after the transaction in substantially the same proportions; no person, subject to certain exclusions, owns 30% or more of the outstanding common shares or voting securities of the resulting entity (unless such ownership level existed before the transaction); and a majority of the directors of the resulting entity were members of Cardinal Health’s Board (including applicable replacements as described above) when the transaction was approved or the transaction agreement was executed; or

our shareholders approve a complete liquidation or dissolution of Cardinal Health.

Generally, a termination is for “good reason” if: we materially reduce the employee’s total compensation, annual or long-term incentive opportunities or duties, responsibilities or authority, or we require the employee to relocate more than 50 miles from his or her office or location.

Mr. Barrett’s employment agreement, and Messrs. Kaufmann, Gomez, Giacomin and Casey’s and Ms. Morrison’s confidentiality and business protection agreements, contain non-competition and non-solicitation provisions that, among other things, prohibit these executives from being employed by certain entities that compete with us for a period of two years after termination of employment (the “Restricted Period”). During the Restricted Period, these executives also are prohibited from soliciting on behalf of a competitor the business of any customer or any known potential

Cardinal Health|2018 Proxy Statement45


Back to Contents

customer of Cardinal Health. These agreements also prohibit disclosure of confidential information, disparagement and recruitment of our employees.

See also “Potential Impact on Compensation from Executive Misconduct (“Clawbacks”)” at page 40 for a discussion of restrictive covenants under the 2011 LTIP applicable to each of the named executives.

New Severance Plan

The Board, upon the recommendation of the Compensation Committee, adopted the Severance Plan, which plan will be effective as of October 1, 2018 and under which our named executives (other than Mr. Barrett) will be eligible for severance benefits under certain circumstances. Under the Severance Plan,

if prior to a change of control or following the second anniversary of a change of control, we terminate a named executive without “cause,” or

during the two-year change of control period, we terminate a named executive without “cause” or a named executive resigns for “good reason,”

then, the named executive will receive:

in the case of the Chief Executive Officer, cash severance equal to 2.0 times (or 2.5 times, if the termination occurs during the change of control period) the sum of annual base salary and target bonus;

in the case of other named executives, cash severance equal to 1.5 times (or 2.0 times, if the termination occurs during the change of control period) the sum of annual base salary and target bonus; and

a prorated annual bonus for the year of termination based on actual performance, or the greater of target performance and actual performance if the termination occurs during the change of control period, and up to 18 months of health insurance premiums.

Receipt of these amounts is conditioned upon execution of a general release and compliance with certain restrictive covenants, including non-competition and non-solicitation covenants that apply for two years following termination.

Table for Named Executives

The table below presents the potential payments and benefits in the event of termination of employment or a change of control for each of the current named executives other than Mr. Casey.executives. These potential amounts have been calculated as if the named executive’s employment had terminated or a change of control had occurred as of June 30, 2018,2020, the last day of fiscal 2018,2020, and using the closing market price of our common shares on June 29, 201830, 2020 ($48.83), the last trading day in fiscal 2018.52.19).

The table does not include benefits that are available to all of our salaried employees upon retirement, death or disability, including 401(k) Savings Plan distributions, group and supplemental life insurance benefits and short-term and long-term disability benefits. The amounts reported in the table below are hypothetical amounts. Actual payments will depend on the circumstances and timing of any termination of employment or change of control. The paragraphs following the table doesexplain the general provisions applicable to each termination or change of control situation.

Cardinal Health | 2020 Proxy Statement    47


Back to Contents

Messrs. Evans and Gomez are not include any benefits that would be payable underincluded in the Severance Plan, which will become effective on October 1, 2018.

As discussed above, Mr. Casey, our former Chief Executive Officer — Medical Segment,table below because they both left the company in February 2018. Hebefore June 30, 2020. Mr. Evans’ compensation arrangements as interim Chief Financial Officer provided that he would not receive severance benefits when he departed. Mr. Gomez did not receive severance andbenefits when he departed, was not retirement-eligible uponeligible for retirement, and forfeited his departure. In November 2017, as part of the succession plans described above, we modified Mr. Barrett’s employment agreement to provide that he will continue to serve as Executive Chairman of the Board until the Annual Meeting, at which time he will retire. Ms. Morrison retired in August 2018.fiscal 2020 annual incentive award and unvested long-term incentive awards.

Retirement or Voluntary

Termination

($)(1)

 

Involuntary Termination

Without Cause

($)(1)

 

Death or

Disability

($)

 

Termination

Following

Change of

Control

($)(1)

 

Voluntary

Termination

($)

(1) 

Involuntary Termination

Without Cause

($)

(1) 

Death or

Disability

($)

 

Termination

Following Change

of Control

($)

(1) 

Kaufmann

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash severance

 

 

 

 

0

 

6,500,000

 

0

 

8,125,000

 

Annual cash incentive(2)

1,240,834

 

1,240,834

 

1,240,834

 

1,240,834

 

Annual cash incentive award(2)

1,929,918

 

1,929,918

 

1,929,918

 

1,929,918

 

Long-term incentive awards (accelerated vesting)(3)

2,049,786

(4)

2,049,786

(4)

4,250,969

(5)

4,250,969

(5)

18,049,912

(4)

18,979,781

(5)

36,891,963

(6)

36,891,963

(6)

Medical benefits

0

 

20,201

 

0

 

20,201

 

Interest on deferred payments

0

 

7,687

 

0

 

9,169

 

TOTAL

3,290,620

 

3,290,620

 

5,491,803

 

5,491,803

 

19,979,830

 

27,437,587

 

38,821,881

 

46,976,251

 

Barrett

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Hollar

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash severance

 

6,800,000

 

 

6,800,000

 

0

 

2,100,000

 

0

 

2,800,000

 

Annual cash incentive(2)

2,031,559

 

2,031,559

 

2,031,559

 

2,031,559

 

0

 

124,317

 

124,317

 

124,317

 

Long-term incentive awards (accelerated vesting)(3)

3,832,032

(4)

3,832,032

(4)

6,302,293

(5)

6,302,293

(5)

0

 

0

 

0

 

3,198,569

(6) 

Medical and dental benefits

 

26,845

 

26,845

(6)

26,845

 

Medical benefits

0

 

12,915

 

0

 

12,915

 

Interest on deferred payments

 

102,701

 

23,625

 

102,701

 

0

 

2,028

 

0

 

2,667

 

TOTAL

5,863,591

 

12,793,137

 

8,384,322

 

15,263,398

 

0

 

2,239,260

 

124,317

 

6,138,468

 

Gomez

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Crawford

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash severance

 

 

 

 

0

 

2,175,000

 

0

 

2,900,000

 

Annual cash incentive(2)

 

352,142

 

352,142

 

352,142

 

0

 

721,653

 

721,653

 

721,653

 

Long-term incentive awards (accelerated vesting)(3)

 

 

1,093,084

(5)

1,093,084

(5)

0

 

0

 

9,089,932

(6) 

9,089,932

(6) 

Medical benefits

0

 

19,484

 

0

 

19,484

 

Interest on deferred payments

0

 

2,642

 

0

 

3,303

 

TOTAL

 

352,142

 

1,445,226

 

1,445,226

 

0

 

2,918,779

 

9,811,585

 

12,734,372

 

Mason

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash severance

0

 

1,875,000

 

0

 

2,500,000

 

Annual cash incentive(2)

0

 

491,639

 

491,639

 

491,639

 

Long-term incentive awards (accelerated vesting)(3)

0

 

0

 

5,629,631

(6) 

5,629,631

(6) 

Medical benefits

0

 

20,211

 

0

 

20,211

 

Interest on deferred payments

0

 

2,158

 

0

 

2,728

 

TOTAL

0

 

2,389,008

 

6,121,270

 

8,644,209

 

Mayer

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash severance

0

 

1,638,750

 

0

 

2,185,000

 

Annual cash incentive(2)

0

 

465,885

 

465,885

 

465,885

 

Long-term incentive awards (accelerated vesting)(3)

0

 

0

 

6,344,686

(6) 

6,344,686

(6) 

Medical benefits

0

 

20,208

 

0

 

20,208

 

Interest on deferred payments

0

 

1,919

 

0

 

2,417

 

TOTAL

0

 

2,126,762

 

6,810,571

 

9,018,196

 

 

www.cardinalhealth.com

Cardinal Health|20182020 Proxy Statement46    48


Back to Contents

 

Retirement or Voluntary

Termination

($)(1)

 

Involuntary Termination

Without Cause

($)(1)

 

Death or

Disability

($)

 

Termination

Following

Change of

Control

($)(1)

 

Giacomin

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash severance

 

 

 

 

Annual cash incentive(2)

 

697,055

 

697,055

 

697,055

 

Long-term incentive awards (accelerated vesting)(3)

 

488,935

(4)

1,833,298

(5)

2,550,317

(5)

TOTAL

 

1,185,990

 

2,530,353

 

3,247,372

 

Morford

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash severance

 

 

 

 

Annual cash incentive(2)

497,425

 

497,425

 

497,425

 

497,425

 

Long-term incentive awards (accelerated vesting)(3)

832,795

(4)

832,795

(4)

1,290,113

(5)

1,290,113

(5)

TOTAL

1,330,220

 

1,330,220

 

1,787,538

 

1,787,538

 

Morrison

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash severance

 

 

 

 

Annual cash incentive(2)

 

424,285

 

424,285

 

424,285

 

Long-term incentive awards (accelerated vesting)(3)

 

205,867

(4)

975,111

(5)

975,111

(5)

TOTAL

 

630,152

 

1,399,396

 

1,399,396

 

(1)

Messrs. Kaufmann, Barrett and Morford satisfied the age and service requirements to qualify for retirement under our 2011 LTIP in the event of either a voluntary termination or an involuntary termination without cause. Mr. Giacomin and Ms. Morrison satisfied the age and service requirements to qualify for retirement under our 2011 LTIP with respect to awards granted to them after July 1, 2017 in the event of an involuntary termination without cause.

Under the November 2017 modification to Mr. Barrett’s employment agreement, he will receive two years of medical and dental benefits for him and his dependents. If prior to his retirement, his employment is terminated without cause or, following a change of control, he terminates his employment for good reason, he would receive, among other things, two times the sum of his annual base salary and target bonus (payable in equal monthly installments over 24 months).

(2)

Assumes that the annual cash incentive payouts were at the following fiscal 2018 target amounts: Mr. Kaufmann — $1,240,834 (actual payout was $1,518,780); Mr. Barrett — $2,031,559 (actual payout was $2,072,190); Mr. Gomez — $352,142 (actual payout was $387,356); Mr. Giacomin — $697,055 (actual payout was $853,195); Mr. Morford — $497,425 (actual payout was $608,848); and Ms. Morrison — $424,285 (actual payout was $432,771).

(3)

We valued the accelerated vesting of PSUs and RSUs by multiplying the closing price of our common shares on June 29, 2018 by the number of PSUs and RSUs. We valued the accelerated vesting of stock options as the difference between the closing price of our common shares on June 29, 2018 and the exercise price for each stock option. PSUs are presented in the table using the same payout assumptions as noted in footnote 3 to the Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End for Fiscal 2018 table on pages 41 and 42.

(4)

Assumes the prorated accelerated vesting of long-term incentive awards, as follows: Mr. Kaufmann — 6,182 PSUs, 83,518 stock options and 35,796 RSUs; Mr. Barrett — 20,606 PSUs, 283,943 stock options and 57,871 RSUs; Mr. Giacomin — 2,377 PSUs, 37,434 stock options and 7,636 RSUs; Mr. Morford — 3,363 PSUs, 47,150 stock options and 13,692 RSUs; and Ms. Morrison — 1,001 PSUs, 15,763 stock options and 3,215 RSUs.

(5)

Assumes the full accelerated vesting of long-term incentive awards, as follows: Mr. Kaufmann — 12,861 PSUs, 125,561 stock options and 74,196 RSUs; Mr. Barrett — 42,867 PSUs, 423,159 stock options and 86,199 RSUs; Mr. Gomez — 1,774 PSUs, 20,694 stock options and 20,612 RSUs; Mr. Giacomin — 12,861 PSUs, 121,290 stock options and 24,684 RSUs; Mr. Morford — 6,995 PSUs, 72,431 stock options and 19,426 RSUs; and Ms. Morrison — 5,415 PSUs, 52,787 stock options and 14,555 RSUs.

(6)

In the event of termination of employment due to death, Mr. Barrett’s medical and dental benefits would be reduced to $16,788.

(1)

Mr. Kaufmann satisfied the age and service requirements to qualify for retirement under our 2011 LTIP in the event of either a voluntary termination or an involuntary termination without cause.

(2)

Assumes that the annual cash incentive payouts were at the following fiscal 2020 target amounts: Mr. Kaufmann — 1,929,918 (actual payout was $2,547,492); Mr. Hollar — $124,317 (actual payout was $149,180); Mr. Crawford — $721,653 (actual payout was $909,283); Mr. Mason — $491,639 (actual payout was $586,348); and Ms. Mayer — $465,885 (actual payout was $559,061).

(3)

We valued the accelerated vesting of PSUs and RSUs by multiplying the closing price of our common shares on June 30, 2020 by the number of PSUs and RSUs. We valued the accelerated vesting of stock options as the difference between the closing price of our common shares on June 30, 2020 and the exercise price for each stock option. PSUs are presented in the table using the same payout assumptions as noted in footnote 3 to the Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End for Fiscal 2020 table on page 45.

(4)

Assumes the prorated accelerated vesting of Mr. Kaufmann’s long-term incentive awards, as follows: 241,239 PSUs, 22,387 stock options and 104,611 RSUs. These awards do not include 17,817 RSUs from a grant made in June 2019 which did not include retirement provisions for a voluntary termination.

(5)

Assumes the prorated accelerated vesting of Mr. Kaufmann’s long-term incentive awards, as follows: 241,239 PSUs, 22,387 stock options and 122,428 RSUs.

(6)

Assumes the full accelerated vesting of long-term incentive awards, as follows: Mr. Kaufmann — 503,357 PSUs, 23,368 stock options and 203,521 RSUs; Mr. Hollar — 40,858 PSUs and 20,429 RSUs; Mr. Crawford — 130,628 PSUs and 43,542 RSUs; Mr. Mason — 80,387 PSUs, 4,059 stock options and 27,481 RSUs; and Ms. Mayer — 89,973 PSUs, 3,690 stock options and 31,596 RSUs.

Voluntary Termination

If a named executive voluntarily terminates, and he or she qualifies for retirement under our 2011 LTIP, he or she generally receives:

a prorated annual cash incentive award based on actual performance;

accelerated prorated vesting of stock options and RSUs held for at least six months and outstanding stock options remain exercisable until the expiration of the option term; and

a prorated number of PSUs held for at least six months that vest on the original vesting date based on actual performance.

Named executives qualify for retirement upon a voluntary termination if they are age 55 or greater and have at least 10 years of service, or they are age 60 or greater and have at least five years of service. If a named executive voluntarily terminates and does not qualify for retirement, he or she is not eligible for any of the post-termination benefits described in this section.

Involuntary Termination Without Cause

If a named executive is involuntarily terminated without cause prior to a change of control or following the second anniversary of a change of control, he or she generally receives under our Severance Plan:

cash severance equal to 2.0 times in the case of Mr. Kaufmann, and 1.5 times in the case of the other named executives, the sum of annual base salary and target annual cash incentive payable in equal installments over 18 to 24 months;

a prorated annual cash incentive award based on actual performance; and

up to 18 months of health insurance premiums.

In addition, if the named executive qualifies for retirement under our 2011 LTIP, he or she receives the same post-termination benefits with respect to equity awards as in a voluntary termination. Retirement qualification is the same as in a voluntary termination, except that named executives can also qualify for retirement upon an involuntary termination if they are age 53 or greater and have at least eight years of service or age 59 or greater and have at least four years of service.

If a named executive is involuntarily terminated without cause and does not qualify for retirement, a named executive will only receive equity awards that vest before termination; otherwise unvested equity awards are forfeited, and the named executive must exercise vested stock options within 90 days.

Involuntary Termination for Cause

If a named executive is involuntarily terminated for cause, he or she is not eligible for any of the post-termination benefits described in this section. In addition, we may require repayment of an annual cash incentive award if the named executive commits misconduct, including a breach of our StandardsofBusinessConduct, and we may cancel unexercised stock options and unvested stock awards and require repayment of proceeds realized from vested awards for a specified period.

“Cause” under the 2011 LTIP generally means termination of employment for fraud or intentional misrepresentation, embezzlement, misappropriation, conversion of assets or the intentional violation of our written policies or procedures. “Cause” under the Severance Plan generally means termination of employment for the following: willful failure to perform substantially the named executive’s duties; the willful engaging in illegal conduct or gross misconduct that is materially and demonstrably injurious to us; conviction of, or plea of guilty or nolo contendere to, a felony or any crime involving dishonesty or moral turpitude; committing or engaging in fraud, embezzlement or theft against us; the material breach of any restrictive covenant in favor of the company; or willfully and materially violating our StandardsofBusinessConductor any other written company policy.

Death or Disability

If a named executive dies or is disabled while employed, the post-termination benefits generally consist of:

a prorated annual cash incentive award based on actual performance;

accelerated vesting of stock options and RSUs held for at least six months and outstanding stock options remain exercisable until the expiration of the option term; and

PSUs held for at least six months vest on the original vesting date based on actual performance.

“Disability” under the 2011 LTIP generally means when a named executive who is under the regular care of a physician is continuously unable to substantially perform his or her job or to be employed in any occupation for which the named executive is qualified by education, training or experience.

Change of Control

The following discussion describes the benefits that are triggered by the occurrence of a change of control that is followed, within two years after a change of control, by the named executive’s employment terminating involuntarily without cause or voluntarily with good reason. The discussion assumes that the surviving entity provides qualifying replacement equity

 

Cardinal Health|2018 Proxy Statement47

Cardinal Health | 2020 Proxy Statement    49


Back to Contents

awards. If it does not, named executives would receive accelerated vesting of equity awards immediately upon a change of control.

In general terms, we will experience a “change of control,” as defined in our compensation plans, if any of the following events occur:

a person or group acquires 30% or more of Cardinal Health’s outstanding common shares or voting securities, subject to limited exceptions;

during any two-year period, individuals who as of the beginning of such two-year period constituted the Board cease for any reason to constitute at least a majority of the Board, unless the replacement directors are approved as described in the compensation plans;

there is a consummation of a reorganization, merger, consolidation or sale or other disposition of all or substantially all of Cardinal Health’s assets or another business combination unless: after the transaction all or substantially all the owners of Cardinal Health’s outstanding common shares or voting securities prior to the transaction own more than 50% of such securities after the transaction in substantially the same proportions; no person, subject to certain exclusions, owns 30% or more of the outstanding common shares or voting securities of the resulting entity (unless such ownership level existed before the transaction); and a majority of the directors of the resulting entity were members of Cardinal Health’s Board (including applicable replacements as described above) when the transaction was approved or the transaction agreement was executed; or

our shareholders approve a complete liquidation or dissolution of Cardinal Health.

A termination is for “good reason” if we materially reduce the named executive’s total compensation, annual or long-term incentive opportunities, or duties, responsibilities or authority, or we require the named executive to relocate more than 50 miles from his or her office or location.

If a named executive is involuntarily terminated without cause, or he or she voluntarily terminates employment with good reason within two years after a change of control, he or she receives under our Severance Plan:

cash severance equal to 2.5 times in the case of Mr. Kaufmann, and 2.0 times in the case of the other named executives, the sum of annual base salary and target annual cash incentive payable in equal installments over 24 to 30 months;

a prorated annual cash incentive award based on the greater of target performance and actual performance; and

up to 18 months of health insurance premiums.

Under our 2011 LTIP, a named executive receives accelerated vesting of equity awards and stock options remain exercisable until the earlier of three years from termination or expiration of the option term. The number of PSUs received is based on the actual performance before the change of control and expected performance for the remainder of the performance period.

The actual payments made under the Severance Plan will be reduced to the extent necessary to eliminate any “golden parachute” excise tax under the Code provided that the value of the adjusted payments and benefits is not less than the amount the named executive otherwise would have received on an after-tax basis.

Our plans do not provide for any tax gross-ups for taxes due on any payments described in this section.

Conditions Applicable to Receipt of Payments

Our named executives are subject to certain conditions and obligations applicable to the receipt of payments or benefits upon a termination of employment. Our Severance Plan conditions the payment of severance benefits upon continued compliance with restrictive covenants that, among other things, prohibit named executives for a period of two years after termination of employment from being employed by certain entities that compete with us and from soliciting on behalf of a competitor the business of any customer or any known potential customer of Cardinal Health. These covenants also prohibit disclosure of confidential information, disparagement and recruitment or employment of our employees. Named executives are also subject to certain restrictive covenants under the 2011 LTIP which are discussed under “Potential Impact on Compensation from Executive Misconduct (“Clawbacks”)” at page 45.

Pay Ratio Disclosure

The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and SEC rules require us to provide the ratio of the annual total compensation of Mr. Kaufmann, our Chief Executive Officer, since January 1, 2018, to the annual total compensation of our median employee.

For fiscal 2018,2020, the median annual total compensation of all our employees of the company (other than the Chief Executive Officer) was $51,434.$54,619. Mr. Kaufmann’s annual total compensation for fiscal 20182020 for purposes of the pay ratio disclosure was $11,356,917.$14,231,109. Based on this information, for fiscal 2018,2020, the ratio of the compensation of the Chief Executive Officer to the median annual total compensation of all other employees was estimated to be 221261 to 1.

To identify and determineWe used the annual total compensation of thesame median employee in our pay ratio calculation for fiscal 2020 as we collected the payroll data of all employees globally as of April 1,used for fiscal 2018 and used total base2019 because there was no change in our employee population or employee compensation arrangements that we believed would significantly impact our pay as of April 1, 2018 as our compensation measure, which we consistently applied to all employees.

Using this methodology, we determined that theratio disclosure. The median employee was a non-exempt, full-time employee located in the United States.

The annual total compensation was calculated for both Mr. Kaufmann and the median employee in accordance with the SEC rules applicable to the Summary Compensation Table and also includes the company-paid portion of health insurance premiums, which areis not required to be included in the Summary Compensation Table.

Mr. Kaufmann served as Chief Executive Officer on April 1, 2018, the determination date of the median employee. Because Mr. Kaufmann did not serve as the Chief Executive Officer for the entirety of fiscal 2018, we elected to annualize his base salary and annual cash incentive award for purposes of the pay ratio disclosure as if he were the Chief Executive Officer for the full fiscal year. We also elected to present Mr. Kaufmann’s long-term incentive grants based on the target value set by the Compensation Committee in November 2017 in connection with his appointment to Chief Executive Officer. As a result of these adjustments and the inclusion of the company-paid portion of health insurance premiums, for purposes of the pay ratio disclosure, Mr. Kaufmann’s annual total compensation of $11,356,917 for fiscal 2018 differs from the amount of $8,423,580 reported for Mr. Kaufmann in the fiscal 2018 Summary Compensation Table (see page 35).

The pay ratio disclosure presented above is a reasonable estimate calculated in a manner consistent with SEC rules. Because the SEC rules for identifying the median employee and calculating the pay ratio allow companies to use different methodologies, exclusions, estimates and assumptions that reflect their employee populations and compensation practices, the pay ratio disclosure of other companies may not be comparable to the pay ratio reported by us.

 

www.cardinalhealth.com

Cardinal Health|20182020 Proxy Statement    50


Back to Contents

EquityCompensationPlanInformation

The table below summarizes information relating to our equity compensation plans at June 30, 2020.

Plan Category

Common Shares

to be Issued

Upon Exercise of

Outstanding Options

and Rights

(#)

 

Weighted Average

Exercise Price of

Outstanding Options

($)

 

Common Shares

Remaining Available

for Future Issuance

Under Equity

Compensation Plans

(excluding securities

reflected in column (a))

(#)

 

 

(a)

 

(b)

 

(c)

 

Equity compensation plans approved by shareholders

10,582,779

(1)

         

$      65.15

(1)

11,580,762

(2)

Equity compensation plans not approved by shareholders

4,203

(3)

(3)

 

TOTAL AT JUNE 30, 2020

10,586,982

 

 

 

11,580,762

 

(1)

In addition to stock options outstanding under the 2011 LTIP and the Cardinal Health, Inc. 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “2005 LTIP”), also includes 1,961,573 PSUs and 3,188,677 RSUs outstanding under the 2011 LTIP, 22,431 RSUs outstanding under the 2005 LTIP, and 130,591 RSUs outstanding under the 2007 Nonemployee Directors Equity Incentive Plan that are payable solely in common shares. PSUs and RSUs do not have an exercise price, and therefore were not included for purposes of computing the weighted-average exercise price. PSUs that vested after June 30, 2020 are reported at the actual amount that vested. All other PSUs are reported at the maximum payout level in accordance with SEC rules.

(2)

Reflects common shares available under the 2011 LTIP in the form of stock options and other stock-based awards. Under the 2011 LTIP’s fungible share counting provisions, stock options are counted against the plan as one share for every common share issued; awards other than stock options are counted against the plan as two and one-half shares for every common share issued. This means that only 4,632,305 shares could be issued under awards other than stock options while 11,580,762 shares could be issued under stock options.

(3)

RSUs outstanding under the Cardinal Health, Inc. Amended and Restated Outside Directors Equity Incentive Plan that are payable solely in common shares. RSUs do not have an exercise price, and therefore were not included for purposes of computing the weighted-average exercise price.

48

Cardinal Health | 2020 Proxy Statement    51


Back to Contents

Amendment to Restated Code of Regulations

Proposal to Approve an Amendment to Our Restated Code of Regulations to Reduce the Share Ownership Threshold for Calling a Special Meeting of Shareholders

We are asking shareholders to approve an amendment to Section 1.2(b) of our Restated Code of Regulations (the “Proposed Code Amendment”) to lower the share ownership threshold for shareholders to request that the company call a special meeting to 15% from 25% and extend by 15 days the time allowed for providing notice of the special meeting (to 20 days from 5 days) and the latest date that can be set for holding the special meeting (to 80 days from 65 days).

The actual text of the Proposed Code Amendment, marked with deletions indicated by strikeouts and additions indicated by underlining to reflect the Proposed Code Amendment, is set forth below.

(b) A special meeting of shareholders shall be called by the Company upon the request of the holders of shares entitling them to exercise 2515 percent of the voting power of the Company entitled to be voted at the meeting. Upon delivery to the chairman, president or secretary of a proper request in writing for a shareholders’ meeting, which request must specify the purposes of the meeting and include the information that would be required to be set forth in a shareholder’s notice with respect to an Annual Meeting pursuant to Section 1.5(c) of these regulations, the Company shall give notice to the shareholders. Any such meeting shall be held on a date and at a time and location fixed by the board of directors, the chairman, the president or the secretary, which date shall not be less than 14 days nor more than 6580 days after deliveryreceipt of a proper request. If this notice is not given within 520 days after receiptof a proper request by shareholders entitled to call a meeting, the persons making the request may fix the time of the meeting by giving notice in the manner provided in Section 1.4 of these regulations or cause such notice to be given by their designated representative.

Shareholder Special Meeting Threshold

In light of the company’s receipt of a shareholder proposal requesting that the Board take the steps to lower its special meeting threshold, the Board carefully evaluated our corporate governance practices, shareholder feedback, previous shareholder votes, and actions taken by other companies. Based on this evaluation and recent shareholder engagement, the Board believes that the current ownership threshold of 25% for shareholders to request that the company call a special meeting of shareholders should be lowered. The Board further believes that the ownership threshold must strike a balance between empowering the shareholders’ ability to call a special meeting in appropriate circumstances and mitigating the risk that shareholders representing a minority position would seek to disrupt the company with a special meeting. After careful evaluation, the Board believes that a 15% threshold strikes the right balance between enhancing our shareholders’ ability to act on important matters and protecting the company and other shareholders by allowing only a meaningful group of shareholders to exercise this right, thereby minimizing the potential harms associated with allowing a few shareholders to call special meetings.

Date of Meeting and Meeting Notice

In connection with considering the ownership threshold for calling a special meeting, the Board also considered the practical implications of calling and soliciting proxies for a special meeting. The Board concluded that it is advisable and in the best interest of the company and its shareholders to extend by 15 days the time periods allowed for implementing a proper request to call a special shareholder meeting. Specifically, the Proposed Code Amendment would allow the company up to 20 days after receiving a proper request (instead of the current 5-day time frame) to provide notice of the date, time, and location of the special shareholders meeting. The Board believes the 20-day provision is advisable and in the best interest of the company and its shareholders because it will allow the company additional time for matters such as determining and securing the most appropriate date, time and venue for the meeting, assessing the appropriateness of the request to call the special meeting, and evaluating whether the matters proposed to be considered at a special meeting can more effectively be addressed in a manner that avoids holding a special meeting, which could entail discussions with the shareholders requesting the special meeting.

The Proposed Code Amendment also allows the date set for the special meeting of shareholders to be up to 80 days after the company’s receipt of a proper request (instead of the current 65-day time frame). The Board believes the 80-day provision is advisable and in the best interest of the company and its shareholders because it will allow additional time for necessary actions such as having the Board consider and develop recommendations on the matters proposed to be considered at the meeting, allowing the company sufficient time to prepare, clear with the SEC, print and distribute a proxy statement for any such meeting, and providing shareholders additional time to consider and discuss the matters to be voted on at the meeting, in order to promote more informed decision-making.

The Proposed Code Amendment is binding. If the Proposed Code Amendment is approved, it will be effective at the time of the shareholder vote. If the Proposed Code Amendment is not approved by the required vote, then the Restated Code of Regulations will not be amended.

The Board recommends that you vote FOR the proposal to approve an amendment to our Restated Code of Regulations to reduce the share ownership threshold for calling a special meeting of shareholders.

www.cardinalhealth.com

Cardinal Health | 2020 Proxy Statement    52


Back to Contents

Shareholder Proposals

Shareholder Proposal on a Policy to Not Exclude Legal and Compliance Costs for Purposes of Determining Executive Compensation

We received notice that The International Brotherhood of Teamsters General Fund, 25 Louisiana Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20001, a shareholder owning 75 of our common shares as of May 23, 2018, and Rhode Island Employees’ Retirement Systems Pooled Trust, State House - Room 102, Providence, RI 02903, a shareholder owning 8,749 of our common shares as of May 23, 2018, intend to jointly present the following proposal at the Annual Meeting. The proposed resolution and its supporting statement, for which neither we nor the Board accepts responsibility, are set forth below.

The shareholder proposal and supporting statement read as follows:

RESOLVED, that shareholders of Cardinal Health, Inc. (“Cardinal”) urge the Board of Directors to adopt a policy that no financial performance metric shall be adjusted to exclude legal or compliance costs when evaluating performance for purposes of determining the amount or vesting of any senior executive compensation award. “Legal or compliance costs” are expenses or charges associated with any investigation, litigation or enforcement action related to drug distribution, including legal fees; amounts paid in fines; penalties or damages; and, amounts paid in connection with monitoring required by any settlement or judgment of claims of the kind described above. “Incentive Compensation” is compensation paid pursuant to short-term and long-term incentive compensation plans and programs. The policy should be implemented in a way that does not violate any existing contractual obligation of the Company or the terms of any compensation or benefit plan.

SUPPORTINGSTATEMENT: As Cardinal shareholders, we support compensation arrangements that incentivize senior executives to drive growth while safeguarding company operations and reputation over the long-term. Cardinal adjusts certain financial metrics when calculating progress on goals for the purposes of awarding incentive compensation. While some adjustments may be appropriate, we believe senior executives should not be insulated from legal risks.

President Trump has recently declared the opioid epidemic a public health emergency. According to page 28 of the Company’s Q3 Fiscal 2018 10-Q, the company faces “hundreds of lawsuits” relating to the distribution of prescription opioids. In addition, 39 state attorney generals have formed a multi-state task force to investigate the role of distributors, such as Cardinal, in the opioid epidemic. In December 2016, Cardinal agreed to pay $44 million to resolve allegations it violated the federal Controlled Substances Act regarding the distribution of opioids. This settlement with the Department of Justice follows a $34 million penalty in 2008 for similar violations.

We believe the opioid emergency presents a heightened level of risk for Cardinal investors. We also believe Cardinal is well positioned to incentivize senior executives to mitigate these risks by ensuring their compensation is tied to effective management of this crisis. As it is structured now, Cardinal may insulate senior executives from legal risks by removing associated costs from the metrics that determine their incentive compensation.

According to the 2017 proxy statement, Cardinal uses non-GAAP operating earnings and non-GAAP diluted EPS in its annual incentive and performance share units, respectively. In both cases, the metrics are calculated to exclude litigation charges.

We believe a superior approach to aligning executive pay with the company’s performance would be to include legal and compliance costs, particularly those associated with opioid litigation.

We urge shareholders to vote for this proposal.

The Board of Directors’ Statement in Opposition to Proposal 4

The Board recommends a vote AGAINST Proposal 4, because it would impose a broad and unnecessary restriction on the Compensation Committee’s decisions regarding the metrics and adjustments used in incentive programs to further corporate strategy and promote long-term shareholder value creation.

Broadandindiscriminaterestriction.The proposal would require that, when setting senior executive compensation, the Compensation Committee not adjust any financial performance metric for costs encompassed by the proposal’s broadly defined notion of “legal or compliance costs . . . related to drug distribution.” By imposing a flat prohibition, the proposal would prevent consideration of factors such as whether we prevailed in any covered litigation or whether, given our business as a pharmaceutical wholesale distributor, litigation “related to drug distribution” involved an ordinary course business dispute with one of our suppliers or customers. As such, we believe this type of broad and indiscriminate restriction reflects an inappropriate standard that could apply far beyond its stated objective of preventing senior executives from being “insulated from legal risks.”

We also believe that the proposal is not an appropriate response to the opioid crisis facing our country. Our Board and the entire Cardinal Health team care deeply about the devastation opioid abuse is inflicting on our families and communities. We are working to help solve this complex

Cardinal Health|2018 Proxy Statement49


Back to Contents

national public health crisis. We understand and take seriously our responsibility to maintain a rigorous anti-diversion program, while ensuring that medications are available for patients who need them. We are industry leaders in implementing state-of-the-art controls to combat the diversion of pain medications from legitimate uses. Our Board has been active in its oversight and review of our controlled substance anti-diversion program and other important opioid-related issues, including through regular briefings by management and through the formation in February 2018 of an Ad Hoc Committee of independent directors of the Board to assist the Board in its oversight of opioid-related issues. More information about the Ad Hoc Committee and the history of the Board’s engagement with and oversight of these important issues can be found in the “Proxy Summary” and “Corporate Governance” sections of this proxy statement and on our website, at www.cardinalhealth.com under “About Us — Corporate Citizenship — Addressing the Opioid Crisis: Board Engagement and Governance.”

Executivepaydecisionsalignedtoperformanceandlong-termshareholderinterests.A core objective of our executive compensation program is to design and implement performance metrics that challenge our executives to meet and exceed business goals that deliver sustained performance. Historically, our performance metrics use the same non-GAAP earnings measures that we report to shareholders, with minor adjustments that we explain in our proxy statement. We have consistently excluded litigation recoveries and charges from these measures because: these items often relate to events that occurred in prior periods, or over multiple periods; they do not occur in, or reflect, the ordinary course of our business; and their timing and amount are inherently unpredictable. We believe that these adjustments are appropriate when incentivizing executives to make decisions that are aligned with the long-term interests of shareholders, since litigation recoveries and charges may be outside of the scope of management performance or may reflect decisions made by an earlier management team. We have not, however, excluded the significant legal defense costs of opioid litigation or the significant costs of our controlled substance anti-diversion program from our compensation performance metrics. Consequently, these costs have impacted our incentive program payouts.

In addition to financial performance, the Compensation Committee evaluates the decisions and behavior of each executive to ensure that our executives are leading in a manner that is consistent with the values embodied in our StandardsofBusinessConduct when determining incentive compensation. We believe that by considering individual results, company performance and code of conduct values, our incentive compensation programs are appropriately designed to align the interests of our senior executives with the long-term interests of our shareholders. In addition, our incentive plans and agreements provide that we may require repayment of cash incentives and gains realized under equity awards and we may cancel outstanding equity awards in specified instances of executive misconduct, including a material violation of law or of our StandardsofBusinessConduct that causes material financial harm to us.

Transparencyandaccountabilityinourexecutivecompensation.We provide thorough disclosure of the adjustments made under our compensation programs for litigation recoveries and charges, including a reconciliation between GAAP and non-GAAP measures. If the Compensation Committee, in its discretion, determines that any additional adjustments are required, those additional discretionary adjustments also are disclosed. Shareholders are therefore able to see the exact adjustments we make. Also, we will publicly disclose any incentive compensation forfeitures or repayments from our executive officers under our clawback policies, except in certain circumstances explained in our Compensation Discussion and Analysis. Finally, we provide an annual say-on-pay vote to provide more direct and immediate insight into our shareholders’ views on our executive compensation program.

For the foregoing reasons, we believe that the proposal is overly restrictive and broad, and is not an appropriate response to the opioid crisis. Further, we believe that our approach to incentive compensation for our senior executives, which considers individual results, company performance and the values set forth in our StandardsofBusinessConduct, is an appropriate way to align the interests of our senior executives with the long-term interest of our shareholders.

The Board recommends a vote AGAINST this shareholder proposal.

www.cardinalhealth.com

Cardinal Health|2018 Proxy Statement50


Back to Contents

Shareholder Proposal onto Reduce the Share Ownership Threshold for Calling a Special Meeting of Shareholders

We received notice that Kenneth Steiner, 14 Stoner Ave., 2M, Great Neck, NY 11021,John Chevedden, 2215 Nelson Avenue, No. 205, Redondo Beach, CA 90278, a shareholder owning no fewer than 500 shares100 of our common shares as of June 1, 2018,December 27, 2019, intends to present the following proposal at the Annual Meeting. The proposed resolution and its supporting statement, for which neither we nor the Board accepts responsibility, are set forth below.

The shareholder proposal and supporting statement read as follows:

Proposal5MakeShareholderRighttoCallaSpecial Shareholder MeetingsMeetingMoreAccessible

Resolved, Shareowners ask our board of directors to take the steps necessary (unilaterally if possible) to amend our bylaws and each appropriate governing documentsdocument to give holders in the owners of acombined total of 10% of our outstanding common stock the power to call a special shareowner meeting (or the closest percentage to 10% according to state law).meeting. This proposal does not impact our board’s current power to call a special meeting.

Cardinal Health shareholders permanently lack the right to act by written consent – which makes this proposal all the more important since scores of major companies give shareholders the right to call a special meeting and the right to act by written consent.

Special shareholder meetings allow shareholders to vote on important matters, such as electing new directors that can arise between annual meetings. This proposal topic won more than 70%-support at Edwards Lifesciences and SunEdison. This proposal topic, sponsored by William Steiner, also won 78% support at a Sprint annual meeting with 1.7 Billion yes-votes.

Nuance Communications Inc. (NUAN) shareholders gave 94%-support in February 2018 to a rule 14a-82018 shareholder proposal calling for 10% of shareholders to call a special meeting.

It is important that our company goes the extra mile and adopts an ownership threshold of 10%. Some companies have adopted an ownership threshold of 25% which can be unrealistic. An ownership threshold of 25% can mean that more than 50%increased importance to refresh our Board of shareholders must be contacted during a short window of time to simply call a special meeting. And this effort must be funded from the pockets of shareholders which actsDirectors after Chairman Gregory Kenny was rejected by 12-times as an insurance policy that there is a financial need to call a special shareholder meeting. Plus many shareholders, who are convinced that a special meeting should be called, can make a small paperwork error that will disqualify them from counting toward the ownership threshold that is needed for a special meeting.

And the clincher to enable 10% of shareholders to call a special meeting is thatshares in 2019 as 5 other Cardinal Health shareholders do not have any right to actdirectors. John Losh, chairman of audit committee, was rejected by written consent and management seems set on shareholders never having such a right. Meanwhile hundreds of major companies enable shareholders to call a special shareholder meeting and to also act10-times as many shares.

Patricia Hemingway Hall, who chaired the director nomination committee, was rejected by written consent. It is prudent to enable 10% of shareholders to call a special meeting when there is absolutely no right to act9-times as many shares. And Bruce Downey was rejected by written consent.7-times as many shares.

Please vote yes:

Pleasevoteyes:

SpecialMake Shareholder MeetingsRight -to ProposalCall 5aSpecialMeetingMoreAccessible

The Board of Directors’ Statement in Opposition to Proposal 5

The Board recommends a vote AGAINSTProposal 5 because we currently permitand instead recommends a voteFOR Proposal 4.

The Board recognizes that shareholders owning 25% of our common sharesare interested in having the right to call special meetings. TheAfter consulting with and carefully considering the views of our shareholders, the Board believeshas determined that itthe current ownership threshold of 25% for shareholders to call a special meeting should be lowered, but the Board has determined that reducing the threshold to 15% from 25% is not in the best interestsinterest of the company and its shareholders. (See “Proposal 4 — Proposal to Approve an Amendment to Our Restated Code of Regulations to Reduce the Share Ownership Threshold for Calling a Special Meeting of Shareholders”).

Our shareholders have expressed disparate views on our threshold. Many shareholders remain supportive of our existing 25% threshold, but some have expressed the view that, given our market capitalization, 25% of outstanding shares could represent an unattainably high hurdle. At the same time, many shareholders to lower this standard so that holders of only 10% of our common shares are able to call special meetings. Wewith whom we spoke believe that our existing provision, coupled with our robust shareholder engagement programa 10% threshold, as proposed by the proponent, is too low and other meaningful shareholder rights (including annual director elections withwould increase the risk of special meetings being called by a majority standard and a “proxy access” right for nominating directors), is appropriate for a public company of our size as it strikes a proper balance between ensuring accountability tofew shareholders and enabling the Board and management to run the company in an effective manner.focusing on narrow or short-term interests.

The calling of a special meeting should not be an ordinary or easily initiated process, but instead should reflect a broad consensus among shareholders.process. Special meetings are expensive and disruptive fordisruptive. Special meetings should be limited to circumstances where a company with as manyreasonable number of shareholders as Cardinal Health. Ourbelieve that a matter is sufficiently urgent or extraordinary that it must be addressed between annual meetings. Accordingly, our Board and management must commitbelieves that the time to prepare for the meeting and address the matters to be considered at the meeting. We also incur the costs to prepare, print and mail the required disclosure documents. Shareshare ownership thresholdsthreshold to call special meetings are intended tomust strike a balance between theempowering shareholders’ rightability to call a special meeting in appropriate circumstances and mitigating the risk that shareholders representing a minority position would seek to disrupt the company with a special meeting. In contrast, the proposal would permit shareholders who may have short-term interestsAfter careful evaluation, assessment of practices of peer companies, and hold only a relatively small portionevaluation of our shares to initiateshareholders’ views, we believe that a special meeting, even if a large majority of shareholders have little interest in or oppose15% threshold strikes the matters to be considered atnecessary balance.

In reaching this determination, we also concluded that the meeting. That is why 46% of the Fortune 100 companies that provide a special meeting right have a 25% ownership threshold.

The platform of a special meeting of shareholders with the support of less than 25%only 10% of our shares is unnecessary in light ofconsidering our robust shareholder engagement program and our corporate governance structures. We maintain open and regular communication with large and small shareholders, financial analysts and shareholder advisory services about important issues relating to our business and governance.governance and have often incorporated feedback from our engagement into our governing documents, policies, and practices. Shareholders also can and do effectively use our Annual Meeting of Shareholders to communicate their concernsviews to management, the Board, and other shareholders. And ourOur directors are accountable to shareholders through their annual election and our majority voting standard.

In light

Cardinal Health | 2020 Proxy Statement    53


Back to Contents

For these reasons, the Board recommends that shareholders vote AGAINST this shareholder proposal and in favor of Proposal 4 put forth by the company to amend the Restated Code of Regulations.

The Board recommends a vote AGAINST this shareholder proposal.

Shareholder Proposal to Adopt a Policy that the Chairman of the Board Be an Independent Director

We received notice that Kenneth Steiner, 14 Stoner Ave., 2M, Great Neck, NY 11021, a shareholder owning at least $2,000 in market value of our existing special meeting provision,common shares as of May 8, 2020, intends to present the following proposal at the Annual Meeting. The proposed resolution and its supporting statement, for which neither we nor the Board accepts responsibility, are set forth below.

The shareholder proposal and supporting statement read as follows:

Proposal6IndependentBoardChairman

Shareholders request our Board of Directors adopt as policy, and amend our governing documents to require that the Chairman of the Board be an independent member of the Board whenever possible. Although it would be better to have an immediate transition to an independent Board Chairman, the Board would have the discretion to phase in this policy for the next Chief Executive Officer transition. Currently Cardinal Health directors can name one person to have the Chairman and CEO job at the same time at any time they want to.

This proposal topic won 52% support at Boeing in April 2020. This proposal topic also won 50%-plus support at 5 major U.S. companies in one year including 73%-support at Netflix.

This proposal topic won 36%-support from Cardinal Health shareholders in 2017. There have been setbacks at Cardinal Health since 2017.

Cardinal Health and 2 other large opioid distributors and 2 opioid manufacturers were in talks to settle the more than 2,000 lawsuits against them over their role in the opioid epidemic for $50 billion. The possible settlement would include $22 billion in cash and $29 billion in drugs and distribution. Cardinal Health, McKesson and AmerisourceBergen Corporation would give $18 billion to be used for treatment and prevention over 18 years.

Meanwhile, our Directors were busy making it more difficult to hold them responsible. In late 2019 Cardinal Health directors adopted a formal amendment to require that the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio will be the exclusive forum for derivative lawsuits and other lawsuits.

There are indications that shareholders are growing impatient with the directors. Bruce Downey, Gregory Kenny, John Losh and Patricia Hall each received from 7-times to 12-times as many negative votes from shareholders as each of 5 other Cardinal Health directors at the 2019 annual meeting.

An independent Chairman is best positioned to build up the oversight capabilities of our directors while our CEO addresses the challenging day-to-day issues facing the company. The roles of Chairman of the Board and CEO are fundamentally different and should not be held by the same person. There should be a clear division of responsibilities between these positions to insure a balance of power and authority on the Board.

Please vote yes:

IndependentBoardChairman-Proposal6

The Board of Directors’ Statement in Opposition to Proposal 6

The Board recommends a vote AGAINSTProposal 6.

Cardinal Health has had an independent Chairman of the Board since November 2018, when the Board adopted the current board leadership structure. As outlined in our Corporate Governance Guidelines, we believe that it is a key responsibility of the Board to thoughtfully consider its leadership structure based upon the circumstances, as opposed to adopting the inflexible structure advocated by the proponent. Accordingly, the Nominating and Governance Committee periodically reviews, assesses, and makes recommendations to the Board regarding its leadership structure. While the Nominating and Governance Committee and the Board have determined that it currently is appropriate to separate the roles and have an independent director serve as Chairman, our Corporate Governance Guidelines already provide that if the Board in the future determines to appoint a non-independent Chairman, the independent directors will elect an independent director to serve as Lead Director. In that situation, the independent Lead Director would have many of the same duties and responsibilities that our independent Chairman currently holds.

Since November 2018, Gregory Kenny has served as the independent Chairman of our Board. Prior to that, Mr. Kenny served as our independent Lead Director for four years. Both in his current role as Chairman of the Board and in his prior role as independent Lead Director, Mr. Kenny has promoted strong independent Board leadership and a robust, deliberative decision-making process among our independent directors. He has devoted significant time and thought to call on and employ the many talents and experience of the Board as it engages on a variety of critical issues, including strategic priorities, capital deployment, operational efficiencies, the opioid epidemic and risk mitigation. He has personally and actively participated in our proactive shareholder engagement program, meeting with many of our shareholders and other meaningful shareholder rights,engaging on issues such as our response to the COVID-19 pandemic and Board oversight of our response to the opioid epidemic.

During Mr. Kenny’s tenure as Lead Director, the Board formalized its oversight of opioid-related issues by forming an Ad Hoc Committee of independent directors in February 2018 dedicated to these issues. The Ad

www.cardinalhealth.com

Cardinal Health | 2020 Proxy Statement    54


Back to Contents

Hoc Committee has been actively involved to assist the Board in overseeing the company’s response to the opioid epidemic, meeting twice per quarter.

The Board believes that adoptionour Corporate Governance Guidelines and these other actions and initiatives affirm the Board’s independence from, and active oversight of, management. Given these strengths, the proposal isBoard’s composition and committee system, and the strong corporate governance practices that are in place, the Board does not necessary.believe that any changes to our existing Board leadership provisions are warranted.

The Board recommends a vote AGAINST this shareholder proposal.

 

Cardinal Health|2018 Proxy Statement51

Cardinal Health | 2020 Proxy Statement    55


Back to Contents

Share Ownership Information

Beneficial Ownership

The table below sets forth certain information regarding the beneficial ownership of our common shares by, and the percentage of our outstanding common shares represented by such ownership for:

each person known by us to own beneficially more than 5% of our outstanding common shares;

our directors;

our current and former named executive officers named in the Summary Compensation Table on page 35;officers; and

all current executive officers and directors as a group.

A person has beneficial ownership of shares if the person has voting or investment power over the shares or the right to acquire such power in 60 days. Investment power means the power to direct the sale or other disposition of the shares. Except as otherwise described in the footnotes below the table, information on the number of shares beneficially owned is as of September 10, 2018August 31, 2020 and the listed beneficial owners have sole voting and investment power.

Name of Beneficial Owner

Common Shares

 

Additional RSUs

and PSUs(13)

Number

Beneficially

Owned

 

Percent

of Class

BlackRock, Inc.(1)

24,845,043

 

8.3

 

The Vanguard Group(2)

24,237,953

 

8.1

 

Wellington Management Group LLP(3)

18,967,126

 

6.3

 

Barrow, Hanley, Mewhinney & Strauss, LLC(4)

17,876,233

 

6.0

 

State Street Corporation(5)

16,982,390

 

5.7

 

David J. Anderson(6)(7)

7,458

 

*

 

Colleen F. Arnold(7)

10,142

 

*

 

19,569

George S. Barrett(8)

2,109,575

 

*

 

44,469

Donald M. Casey Jr.(9)

91,206

 

*

 

Carrie S. Cox(7)

9,381

 

*

 

16,306

Calvin Darden(7)

15,975

 

*

 

19,608

Bruce L. Downey(7)

19,598

 

*

 

18,387

Jon L. Giacomin(8)

208,127

 

*

 

51,906

Jorge M. Gomez(8)

32,390

 

*

 

33,053

Patricia A. Hemingway Hall(7)

8,946

 

*

 

2,612

Akhil Johri

 

*

 

Clayton M. Jones(7)

8,946

 

*

 

6,018

Michael C. Kaufmann(8)(10)

584,287

 

*

 

140,255

Gregory B. Kenny(7)

15,483

 

*

 

19,584

Nancy Killefer(7)

6,918

 

*

 

David P. King(7)

11,598

 

*

 

9,446

Craig S. Morford(8)

199,582

 

*

 

124,050

Patricia B. Morrison(8)(11)

145,416

 

*

 

5,818

All Executive Officers and Directors as a Group (17 Persons)(12)

3,282,020

 

1.1

 

537,898

*

Indicates beneficial ownership of less than 1% of the outstanding shares.

Name of Beneficial Owner

Common Shares

 

Additional RSUs

and PSUs

(14) 

Number

Beneficially

Owned

 

Percent

of Class

The Vanguard Group(1)

35,627,228

 

12.1

 

 

BlackRock, Inc.(2)

22,328,512

 

7.6

 

 

State Street Corporation(3)

21,590,256

 

7.4

 

 

Macquarie Group Limited(4)

17,277,503

 

5.9

 

 

Colleen F. Arnold(5)

13,324

 

*

 

22,993

 

Carrie S. Cox(5)

12,545

 

*

 

19,730

 

Victor L. Crawford

10,182

 

*

 

55,304

 

Calvin Darden(5)

19,933

 

*

 

23,032

 

Bruce L. Downey(5)

22,762

 

*

 

21,811

 

Sheri H. Edison(6)

0

 

*

 

0

 

David C. Evans(7)

0

 

*

 

1,255

 

Jorge M. Gomez(8)

6,529

 

*

 

0

 

Patricia A. Hemingway Hall(5)

12,110

 

*

 

6,036

 

Jason M. Hollar(9)

0

 

*

 

39,058

 

Akhil Johri(5)

5,326

 

*

 

3,424

 

Michael C. Kaufmann(10)(11)

684,725

 

*

 

241,543

 

Gregory B. Kenny(5)

30,976

 

*

 

25,322

 

Nancy Killefer(5)

10,082

 

*

 

3,424

 

J. Michael Losh(5)

7,523

 

*

 

3,424

 

Stephen M. Mason(10)

47,095

 

*

 

35,527

 

Jessica L. Mayer(10)

47,060

 

*

 

36,461

 

Dean A. Scarborough(5)(12)

2,512

 

*

 

3,424

 

John H. Weiland(5)(12)

666

 

*

 

3,424

 

All Executive Officers and Directors as a Group (21 Persons)(13)

1,004,506

 

*

 

605,788

 

*

Indicates beneficial ownership of less than 1% of the outstanding shares.

(1)

Based on information obtained from a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 11, 2020 by The Vanguard Group (“Vanguard”). The address of Vanguard is 100 Vanguard Boulevard, Malvern, Pennsylvania 19355. Vanguard reported that, as of December 31, 2019, it had sole voting power with respect to 434,550 shares, shared voting power with respect to 84,703 shares, sole dispositive power with respect to 35,131,871 shares and shared dispositive power with respect to 495,357 shares. The number and percentage of shares held by Vanguard may have changed since the filing of the Schedule 13G/A.

(2)

Based on information obtained from a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 5, 2020 by BlackRock, Inc. (“BlackRock”). The address of BlackRock is 55 East 52nd Street, New York, New York 10055. BlackRock reported that, as of December 31, 2019, it had sole voting power with respect to 18,693,969 shares and sole dispositive power with respect to all shares shown in the table. The number and percentage of shares held by BlackRock may have changed since the filing of the Schedule 13G/A.

 

www.cardinalhealth.com

Cardinal Health|20182020 Proxy Statement52    56


Back to Contents

(1)

Based on information obtained from a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 8, 2018 by BlackRock, Inc. (“BlackRock”). The address of BlackRock is 55 East 52nd Street, New York, New York 10055. BlackRock reported that, as of December 31, 2017, it had sole voting power with respect to 21,517,276 shares and sole dispositive power with respect to all shares shown in the table. The number and percentage of shares held by BlackRock may have changed since the filing of the Schedule 13G/A.

(2)

Based on information obtained from a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 8, 2018 by The Vanguard Group (“Vanguard”). The address of Vanguard is 100 Vanguard Boulevard, Malvern, Pennsylvania 19355. Vanguard reported that, as of December 31, 2017, it had sole voting power with respect to 446,498 shares, shared voting power with respect to 77,905 shares, sole dispositive power with respect to 23,731,961 shares and shared dispositive power with respect to 505,992 shares. The number and percentage of shares held by Vanguard may have changed since the filing of the Schedule 13G/A.

(3)

Based on information obtained from a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on August 10, 2018 by Wellington Management Group LLP, Wellington Group Holdings LLP, Wellington Investment Advisors Holdings LLP and Wellington Management Company LLP. The address of these entities is 280 Congress Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02210. These entities reported that, as of July 31, 2018, Wellington Management Group LLP had shared voting power with respect to 4,669,656 shares and shared dispositive power with respect to all shares shown in the table, Wellington Group Holdings LLP had shared voting power with respect to 4,669,656 shares and shared dispositive power with respect to all shares shown in the table, Wellington Investment Advisors Holdings LLP had shared voting power with respect to 4,669,656 shares and shared dispositive power with respect to all shares shown in the table and Wellington Management Company LLP had shared voting power with respect to 4,231,034 shares and shared dispositive power with respect to 17,809,676 shares. The number and percentage of shares held by these entities may have changed since the filing of the Schedule 13G/A.

(4)

Based on information obtained from a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 12, 2018 by Barrow, Hanley, Mewhinney & Strauss, LLC (“Barrow Hanley”). The address of Barrow Hanley is 2200 Ross Avenue, 31st Floor, Dallas, Texas 75201-2761. Barrow Hanley reported that, as of December 31, 2017, it had sole voting power with respect to 4,574,435 shares, shared voting power with respect to 13,301,798 shares, and sole dispositive power with respect to all shares shown in the table. The number and percentage of shares held by Barrow Hanley may have changed since the filing of the Schedule 13G.

(5)

Based on information obtained from a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 14, 2018 by State Street Corporation (“State Street”). The address of State Street is State Street Financial Center, One Lincoln Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02111. State Street reported that, as of December 31, 2017, it had shared voting power and shared dispositive power with respect to all shares shown in the table. The number and percentage of shares held by State Street may have changed since the filing of the Schedule 13G.

(6)

Includes 400 common shares held by Mr. Anderson’s spouse. Mr. Anderson resigned from the Board in September 2018.

(7)

Common shares listed as being beneficially owned by our non-management directors include: outstanding RSUs that may be settled within 60 days, as follows: Mr. Anderson — 6,323 shares; Ms. Arnold — 8,946 shares; Ms. Cox — 8,946 shares; Mr. Darden — 8,946 shares; Mr. Downey — 8,946 shares; Ms. Hemingway Hall — 4,651 shares; Mr. Jones — 8,946 shares; Mr. Kenny — 10,064 shares; Ms. Killefer — 6,918 shares; and Mr. King — 8,946 shares; and phantom stock over which the participants have sole voting rights under our DCP, as follows: Mr. Anderson — 135 shares; Ms. Arnold — 1,196 shares; Mr. Darden — 5,894 shares; and Mr. Kenny — 5,419 shares.

(8)

Common shares listed as being beneficially owned by our named executives include: outstanding stock options that are currently exercisable or will be exercisable within 60 days, as follows: Mr. Barrett — 1,651,414 shares; Mr. Giacomin — 187,381 shares; Mr. Gomez — 24,229 shares; Mr. Kaufmann — 444,288 shares; Mr. Morford — 196,740 shares; and Ms. Morrison — 120,509 shares; and outstanding RSUs that will be settled within 60 days, as follows: Mr. Gomez — 5,465 shares; and Mr. Kaufmann — 16,396 shares.

(9)

Mr. Casey left the company on February 2, 2018. Information on the number of shares beneficially owned by him is as of that date, except with respect to outstanding equity awards.

(10)

Includes 10 common shares held by Mr. Kaufmann’s spouse.

(11)

Ms. Morrison retired from the company in August 2018.

(12)

Common shares listed as being beneficially owned by all executive officers and directors as a group include: outstanding stock options for an aggregate of 2,536,808 shares that are currently exercisable or will be exercisable within 60 days; an aggregate of 106,116 RSUs that may or will be settled in common shares within 60 days; and an aggregate of 12,840 shares of phantom stock over which the participants have sole voting rights under our DCP.
(3)

Based on information obtained from a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 13, 2020 by State Street Corporation (“State Street”). The address of State Street is State Street Financial Center, One Lincoln Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02111. State Street reported that, as of December 31, 2019, it had shared voting power with respect to 19,691,185 shares and shared dispositive power with respect to 21,587,288 shares. The number and percentage of shares held by State Street may have changed since the filing of the Schedule 13G.

(4)

Based on information obtained from a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 13, 2020 by Macquarie Group Limited, Macquarie Bank Limited, Macquarie Investment Management Holdings Inc., Macquarie Investment Management Business Trust, Macquarie Investment Management Australia Limited, Macquarie Capital (USA) Inc. and Macquarie Investment Management Austria Kapitalanlage AG. The address of Macquarie Group Limited, Macquarie Bank Limited and Macquarie Investment Management Australia Limited is 50 Martin Place, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. The address of Macquarie Capital (USA) Inc. is 125 W 55th Street, New York, New York 10019. The address of Macquarie Investment Management Holdings Inc. and Macquarie Investment Management Business Trust is 2005 Market Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103. The address of Macquarie Investment Management Austria Kapitalanlage AG is L3, Kaerntner Strasse 28, Vienna C4 1010. These entities reported that, as of December 31, 2019, Macquarie Group Limited and Macquarie Bank Limited each had no sole or shared voting or dispositive power over any shares, Macquarie Investment Management Holdings Inc. and Macquarie Investment Management Business Trust each had sole voting and dispositive power with respect to 16,792,240 shares, Macquarie Investment Management Australia Limited had sole voting and dispositive power with respect to 13,100 shares, Macquarie Capital (USA) Inc. had sole voting and dispositive power with respect to 6,743 shares and Macquarie Investment Management Austria Kapitalanlage AG had sole voting and dispositive power with respect to 13,700 shares. The number and percentage of shares held by these entities may have changed since the filing of the Schedule 13G.

(5)

Common shares listed as being beneficially owned by our non-management directors include: outstanding RSUs that may be settled within 60 days, as follows: Ms. Arnold — 8,946 shares; Ms. Cox — 12,110 shares; Mr. Darden — 8,946 shares; Mr. Downey — 12,110 shares; Ms. Hemingway Hall — 4,651 shares; Mr. Johri — 5,326 shares; Mr. Kenny — 21,226 shares; Ms. Killefer — 10,082 shares; Mr. Losh — 3,225 shares; Mr. Scarborough — 666 shares; and Mr. Weiland — 666 shares; and phantom stock over which the participants have sole voting rights under our DCP, as follows: Ms. Arnold — 1,214 shares; Mr. Darden — 6,688 shares; Mr. Kenny — 15,488 shares; Mr. Losh — 4,298 shares; and Mr. Scarborough — 1,846 shares.

(6)

Ms. Edison joined the Board on September 1, 2020.

(7)

Mr. Evans joined the company in an interim executive role on July 29, 2019 and completed that service on May 25, 2020. He joined the Board on July 1, 2020.

(8)

Mr. Gomez left the company on August 9, 2019. Information on the number of shares beneficially owned by Mr. Gomez is as of his departure date, except for outstanding equity awards.

(9)

Mr. Hollar joined the company on April 27, 2020.

(10)

Common shares listed as being beneficially owned by our named executives include outstanding stock options that are currently exercisable or will be exercisable within 60 days, as follows: Mr. Kaufmann — 472,038 shares; Mr. Mason — 31,825 shares; and Ms. Mayer — 24,091 shares.

(11)

Includes 10 common shares held by Mr. Kaufmann’s spouse.

(12)

Messrs. Scarborough and Weiland joined the Board on September 1, 2019.

(13)

Common shares listed as being beneficially owned by all executive officers and directors as a group include: 570,436 outstanding stock options that are currently exercisable or will be exercisable within 60 days; 89,571 RSUs that may or will be settled in common shares within 60 days; and 29,650 shares of phantom stock over which the participants have sole voting rights under our DCP.

(14)

“Additional RSUs and PSUs” include vested and unvested RSUs and vested PSUs that will not be settled in common shares within 60 days. RSUs and PSUs do not confer voting rights and generally are not considered “beneficially owned” shares under the SEC rules.

Compliance with Delinquent Section 16(a) Reports

Section 16(a) of the Exchange1934 Act requires the company’s directors and certain officers, as well as persons who beneficially own more than 10% of the outstanding common shares, to file reports regarding their initial share ownership and subsequent changes to their ownership with the SEC.

Based solely uponon a review of Forms 3, 4the reports filed for fiscal 2020 and 5 furnished to us andrelated written representations, from our officers and directors, we believe that all of our officers and directors and all beneficial owners of 10% or more of any class of our registered equity securities timely filed all reports required under Section 16(a) reports were filed on a timely basis, except for the late filing due to an inadvertent administrative error of two Form 4s to report the Exchange Act during fiscal 2018.withholding of shares to satisfy tax withholding for RSUs by Mr. Kaufmann and former Chief Accounting Officer Stuart G. Laws.

 

Cardinal Health|2018 Proxy Statement53

Cardinal Health | 2020 Proxy Statement    57


Back to Contents

Other Matters

General Information About the Annual Meeting of Shareholders

TheseDate, Time and Place of Meeting

Date: Wednesday, November 4, 2020

Time: 10:00 a.m. Eastern Time

VirtualMeetingAccess:www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/CAH2020

This proxy materials are beingstatement was first mailed to shareholders on September [     ], 2020. It is furnished to solicitin connection with the solicitation of proxies on behalf ofby the Board of Directors of Cardinal Health, Inc. for use atto be voted during the Annual Meeting to be held on Wednesday, November 7, 2018, and at any adjournment or postponement. The Annual Meeting will take place at our principal executive office located at 7000 Cardinal Place, Dublin, Ohio 43017, at 8:00 a.m. Eastern Time.

These proxy materials include ourfor the purposes set forth in the accompanying Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

Shareholders who execute proxies retain the right to revoke them at any time before the shares are voted by proxy during the meeting. A shareholder may revoke a proxy by delivering a signed statement to our Corporate Secretary at or prior to the Annual Meeting or by timely executing and delivering, by Internet, telephone or mail, another proxy statement and our fiscal 2018 Annual Report to Shareholders, which includes our Annual Reportdated as of a later date.

Proxy Materials are Available on Form 10-K. In addition, thesethe Internet

We are furnishing proxy materials may include a proxy card for the Annual Meeting. These proxy materials are first being sent or made available to our shareholders commencing on September 26, 2018.

Noticeprimarily via the Internet instead of Internet Availabilitymailing printed copies of Proxy Materials

As permitted by the SEC, we are providing proxythose materials to someeach shareholder. By doing so, we save costs and reduce the environmental impact of our shareholders via the Internet. Commencing onAnnual Meeting. On September 26, 2018,[ ], 2020, we mailed a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the “Notice(“Notice”) to certain of Internet Availability”) explainingour shareholders. The Notice contains instructions about how to access our proxy materials and vote online or vote online.by telephone. If you received the Notice of Internet Availability, you will notwould like to receive a printedpaper copy of our proxy materials, by mailplease follow the instructions included in the Notice. If you previously chose to receive our proxy materials electronically, you will continue to receive access to these materials via email unless you request oneelect otherwise.

Participating in the Annual Meeting

The Annual Meeting will be conducted exclusively online without an option for physical attendance in light of the COVID-19 pandemic. We aim to offer shareholders rights and participation opportunities during our virtual meeting that are comparable to those that have been provided at our past in-person annual meetings.

Shareholders of record as of the record date will be able to participate in the virtual meeting online, vote shares electronically, and submit questions during the meeting by followingvisiting www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/CAH2020 and entering the directions16-digit control number included in the Notice, voting instruction form, or proxy card. Only shareholders and proxy holders who enter a valid control number will be able to participate in the virtual Annual Meeting to submit questions and vote.

The live webcast of Internet Availability.

Record Datethe Annual Meeting will begin promptly at 10:00 a.m., Eastern Time. We encourage you to access the webcast early, starting at approximately 9:45 a.m., Eastern Time, to allow yourself time to log in and test your computer. If you encounter technical difficulties accessing the virtual Annual Meeting, please call the technical support telephone number posted on www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/CAH2020. Consistent with our historical practice of taking questions from shareholders who attend the annual meeting of shareholders in person, shareholders will be able to ask questions during the virtual Annual Meeting. We will post Annual Meeting rules on www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/CAH2020.

We will make an audio replay of the Annual Meeting available and post questions and answers received at the Annual Meeting that were not addressed (if applicable to Cardinal Health’s business and otherwise appropriate under the Annual Meeting rules) on the Cardinal Health Investor Relations website shortly after the meeting.

Even if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting online, we encourage you to vote in advance of the Annual Meeting as described in this proxy statement, so that your vote will be counted if you later decide not to attend the Annual Meeting or you encounter technical difficulties. If you wish to submit your votes before the virtual Annual Meeting, then you do not have fixedto vote at the Annual Meeting unless you wish to change your vote.

Attending the Annual Meeting as a Guest

If you do not have a 16-digit control number, you may still attend the meeting as a guest in listen-only mode. To attend as a guest, please visit www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/CAH2020 and enter the information requested on the screen to register as a guest. Please note that you will not have the ability to vote or ask questions during the meeting if you participate as a guest.

Soliciting Proxies

The Board of Directors is soliciting the proxy accompanying this proxy statement. Proxies may be solicited by officers, directors and employees of Cardinal Health, none of whom will receive any additional compensation for their services. Alliance Advisors may solicit proxies at a cost we anticipate will not exceed $17,000. These solicitations may be made personally or by mail, facsimile, telephone, messenger, email or the Internet. Cardinal Health will pay persons holding common shares in their names or in the names of nominees, but not owning shares beneficially, such as brokerage houses, banks and other fiduciaries, for the expense of forwarding solicitation materials to their principals. Cardinal Health will pay all proxy solicitation costs.

Shareholders of record at the close of business on September 10, 2018 as the record date for determining our shareholders8, 2020, will be entitled to noticevote during the meeting on the basis of one vote for each share held. On September 8, 2020, there were [        ] common shares outstanding, held of record by [    ] shareholders.

www.cardinalhealth.com

Cardinal Health | 2020 Proxy Statement    58


Back to Contents

Householding

Under the rules adopted by the SEC, we may deliver a single set of proxy materials to one address shared by two or more of our shareholders. This delivery method is referred to as “householding” and can result in significant cost savings. To take advantage of this opportunity, we have delivered only one set of proxy materials to votemultiple shareholders who share an address, unless we received contrary instructions from the impacted shareholders prior to the mailing date. We agree to deliver promptly, upon written or oral request, a separate copy of the proxy materials, as requested, to any shareholder at the Annual Meeting. On that date, we had 299,864,949 common shares outstanding. Shareholders asshared address to which a single copy of these documents was delivered. If you prefer to receive separate copies of the proxy statement or annual report, contact Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. by calling 1-866-540-7095 or in writing at 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, New York 11717, Attention: Householding Department. In addition, if you currently are a shareholder who shares an address with another shareholder and would like to receive only one copy of future notices and proxy materials for your household, you may notify your broker if your shares are held in a brokerage account or you may notify us if you are a shareholder of record. Shareholders of record date will have one vote per share formay notify us by contacting Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. at the election of each director nominee and on each other voting matter.above telephone number or address.

Quorum Requirement 

We will have a quorum to conduct business at the Annual Meeting if the holders of a majority of our common shares entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting are present either in person or represented by proxy.

Board RecommendationVoting Procedures

The Board recommends that you vote FOR the election of the nine director nominees, FOR Proposals 2 and 3 and AGAINST Proposals 4 and 5.

How to Vote

Shareholdersofrecord. If you are a “shareholder of record” (meaning your shares are registered in your name with our transfer agent, Computershare Trust Company, N.A.), youYou may vote either in person atelectronically during the Annual Meeting at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/CAH2020 or by proxy.providing a proxy or voting instructions in advance of the meeting. If you decide to vote by proxy,prior to the Annual Meeting, you may do so in any one of the following three ways:

By telephone. You may vote your shares 24 hours a day by calling the toll freetoll-free number 1-800-652-VOTE (8683)1-800-690-6903 within the United States, U.S. territories or Canada, and following instructions provided by the recorded message. You will need to enter identifying information that appears on your proxy card, voting instruction form or the Notice of Internet Availability.Notice. The telephone voting system allows you to confirm that your votes were properly recorded.

ByInternet. You may vote your shares 24 hours a day by logging on to a secure website, www.envisionreports.com/CAHwww.proxyvote.com, and following the instructions provided. You will need to enter identifying information that appears on your proxy card, voting instruction form or the Notice of Internet Availability.Notice. As with the telephone voting system, you will be able to confirm that your votes were properly recorded.

By mail. If you received a proxy card,materials by mail, you may mark, sign and date your proxy card or voting instruction form and return it by mail in the enclosed postage-paid envelope.

Telephone and Internet voting is available through 2:00 a.m.11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday,Tuesday, November 7, 2018.3, 2020. If you vote by mail, your proxy card or voting instruction form must be received before the Annual Meeting to assure that your vote is counted. We encourage you to vote promptly.

Beneficialowners. If, like most shareholders, you are a beneficial owner of shares held in “street name” (meaning a broker, trustee, bank or other nominee holds shares on your behalf), you may vote in person at the Annual Meeting only if you obtain a legal proxy from the nominee that holds your shares. Alternatively, you may vote by completing, signing and returning the voting instruction form that the nominee provides to you or by following any telephone or Internet voting instructions described on the voting instruction form, the Notice of Internet Availability or other materials that the nominee provides to you. We encourage you to vote promptly.

www.cardinalhealth.com

Cardinal Health|2018 Proxy Statement54


Back to Contents

Changing or Revoking Your Proxy

Your attendance at the Annual Meeting will not automatically revoke your proxy.If you are a shareholder of record, you may change or revoke your proxy at any time before a vote is taken at the meeting by giving notice to us in writing prior to the Annual Meeting or in person at the Annual Meeting, by executing and forwarding to us a later-dated proxy or by voting a later proxy over the telephone or the Internet. If you are a beneficial owner of shares, you should check with the broker, trustee, bank or other nominee that holds your shares to determine how to change or revoke your vote.

Voting Shares Held Through Our Employee Plans

If you hold shares through our 401(k) Savings Plans or DCP, you will receive voting instructions from Computershare Trust Company, N.A.Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. and can vote through one of the three methods described above under “How to Vote.” Please note that employee plan shares have an earlier voting deadline of 2:00 a.m.11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday,Sunday, November 5, 2018.1, 2020.

Broker Non-Votes

If you are a beneficial owner whose shares are held by a broker as stated above you must instruct the broker how to vote your shares. Ifand you do not provide voting instructions prior to the meeting, your broker is not permitted to vote your shares on the election of directors, the advisory vote to approve the compensation of our named executive officers, the proposal to amend our Restated Code of Regulations to reduce the share ownership threshold for calling a special meeting of shareholders or the shareholder proposals. The inability of the broker to vote your shares on these proposals results in a “broker non-vote.” In the absence of voting instructions, the broker can only register your shares as being present at the Annual Meeting for purposes of determining a quorum and may vote your shares on ratification of the appointment of our auditor.

VotingMajority Vote Standard for Election of Directors

To elect directors under Proposal 1, our governing documents require that a director nominee be elected by a majority of votes cast in an uncontested election. If an incumbent director nominee receives a greater number of votes “against” than votes “for” his or her election, our Corporate Governance Guidelines require the director to promptly tender a resignation to the Chairman of the Board. Within 90 days following the certification of the shareholder vote, the Nominating and Governance Committee will recommend to the Board whether to accept the resignation. Thereafter, the Board will promptly act and publicly disclose its decision and the rationale behind the decision.

Vote Required; Effect of Abstentions and Broker Non-Votes

You may either vote FOR, AGAINSTor ABSTAIN on each of the proposals. Votes will be tabulated by or under the direction of inspectors of election, who will certify the results following the Annual Meeting.

To elect directors under ProposalProposals 1 our governing documents require that a director nominee be elected by a majority of votes cast in an uncontested election. If an incumbent director nominee receives a greater number of votes “against” than votes “for” his or her election, our Corporate Governance Guidelines require the director to promptly tender a resignation to the Chairman of the Board. Within 90 days following the certification of the shareholder vote, the Nominatingthrough 3, 5 and Governance Committee will recommend to the Board whether to accept the resignation. Thereafter, the Board will promptly act and publicly disclose its decision and the rationale behind the decision. Proxies may not be voted for more than nine director nominees, and shareholders may not cumulate their voting power. Proposals 2 through 56 each require approval by a majority of votes cast. For each proposal, abstentionsAbstentions and broker non-votes are not considered as votes cast and will not be counted in determining the outcome of the voting results. Proxies may not be voted for more than 13 director nominees, and shareholders may not cumulate their voting power.

Proposal 4 requires the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the issued and outstanding common shares. Abstentions and broker non-votes will have the same effect as votes against this proposal.

How Shares Will Be Voted

The shares represented by all valid proxies received by telephone, by Internet or by mail will be voted in the manner specified. For shareholders of record who do not specify a choice for a proposal, proxies that are signed and returned will be voted FOR the election of all nine13 director

Cardinal Health | 2020 Proxy Statement    59


Back to Contents

nominees, FOR the ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as independent auditor, FOR approval of the compensation of our named executive officers, FOR approval of the proposed amendment to our Restated Code of Regulations to reduce the share ownership threshold for calling a special meeting of shareholders andAGAINSTthe shareholder proposals.proposals, if properly presented. If any other matters properly come before the Annual Meeting, the individuals named in your proxy, or their substitutes, will determine how to vote on those matters in their discretion. The Board does not know of any other matters that will be presented for action at the Annual Meeting.

Attending the Annual Meeting

To attend the Annual Meeting, you must be a shareholder as of September 10, 2018, the record date, and have an admission ticket or satisfactory proof of share ownership and photo identification. If you are a shareholder of record, you must present an admission ticket (which is attached to your proxy card) or you must present the Notice of Internet Availability. If you are a beneficial owner, in order to be admitted to the meeting, you must present either a valid legal proxy from your bank, broker or other nominee as to your shares, the Notice of Internet Availability, a voting instruction form or a bank or brokerage account statement. Anyone holding an admission ticket or other documentation not issued in his or her name will not be admitted to the meeting. Our Annual Meeting rules prohibit cameras, videotaping equipment and other recording devices, large packages, banners or placards in the meeting and prohibit use of a phone or other device.

You can call our Investor Relations department at (614) 757-4757 if you need directions to the Annual Meeting.

Even if you expect to attend the Annual Meeting in person, we urge you to vote your shares in advance.

Cardinal Health|2018 Proxy Statement55


Back to Contents

Communicating with the Board

Shareholders and other interested parties may communicate with the Board, any committee of the Board, any individual director or the independent directors as a group, by writing to the Office of the CorporateJohn M. Adams, Jr., Secretary, Cardinal Health, Inc., 7000 Cardinal Place, Dublin, Ohio 43017 or sending an e-mailemail to bod@cardinalhealth.com. Communications from shareholders will be distributed to the entire Board unless addressed to a particular committee, director or group of directors. The Corporate Secretarycorporate secretary will not distribute communications that are unrelated to the duties of the Board, such as spam, junk mail, mass mailings, business solicitations and advertisements.

Shareholder Recommendations for Director Nominees

The Nominating and Governance Committee will consider candidates recommended by shareholders for election as director. Shareholder recommendations will be evaluated against the same criteria used to evaluate other director nominees, which criteria are discussed under “Board Membership Criteria: What we look for” on page 9. Shareholders who wish to recommend a candidate may do so by writing to the Nominating and Governance Committee in care of the Office of the CorporateJohn M. Adams, Jr., Secretary, Cardinal Health, Inc., 7000 Cardinal Place, Dublin, Ohio 43017. To be considered by the Nominating and Governance Committee for consideration at the 20192021 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, a shareholder recommendation must be received no later than April 1, 2019.2021.

Recommendations must include, at a minimum, the following information:

the name and address of the shareholder making the recommendation;

the name and address of the person recommended for nomination;

if the shareholder is not a shareholder of record, a representation and satisfactory proof of share ownership;

a statement in support of the shareholder’s recommendation, including sufficient information to permit the Nominating and Governance Committee to evaluate the candidate’s qualifications, skills and experience;

a description of all direct or indirect arrangements or understandings between the shareholder and the candidate recommended by the shareholder;

information regarding the candidate as would be required to be included in a proxy statement filed in accordance with SEC rules; and

the candidate’s written, signed consent to serve if elected.

Shareholders who wish to nominate directors directly for election at an Annual Meeting of Shareholders in accordance with the procedures in our Restated Code of Regulations, including under our proxy access provision, should follow the instructions under “Submitting Proxy Proposals and Director Nominations for the Next Annual Meeting of Shareholders” below and the details contained in our Code of Regulations.

Submitting Proxy Proposals and Director Nominations for the Next Annual Meeting of Shareholders

If you intend to present a proposal to be included in the proxy statement and form of proxy relating to our 20192021 Annual Meeting of Shareholders under Rule 14a-8 under the Exchange Act, Rule 14a-8, we must receive the proposal at our principal executive officeoffices not later than the close of business (5:00 p.m. Eastern Time) on May 29, 2019.[ ], 2021. The proposal should be addressed to our CorporateJohn M. Adams, Jr., Secretary, at Cardinal Health, Inc., 7000 Cardinal Place, Dublin, Ohio 43017. We will not be required to include in our proxy statement or form of proxy a shareholder proposal that we receive after that date or that otherwise fails to meet the requirements for shareholder proposals established by the SEC regulations.rules.

If you intend to present a proposal for other business or a nomination for election to the Board at our 20192021 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (other than any such proposal included in our proxy statement and form of proxy under Rule 14a-8 under the Exchange Act Rule 14a-8)Act), you must comply with the notice requirements set forth in our Restated Code of Regulations and such business must be a proper matter for shareholder action. Among other requirements, you must deliver proper written notice to our Corporate Secretarycorporate secretary at our principal executive officeoffices no earlier than July 10, 20197, 2021 and no later than the close of business on August 9, 2019.6, 2021. If the date of the 20192021 Annual Meeting of Shareholders is more than 30 days before, or more than 60 days after, November 7, 2019,4, 2021, written notice must be

www.cardinalhealth.com

Cardinal Health | 2020 Proxy Statement    60


Back to Contents

delivered after the close of business on the 120th day prior to the meeting, but before the close of business on the later of the 90th day prior to the meeting or the 10th day after we first publicly announce the date of the meeting.

Our Restated Code of Regulations includes a proxy access provision, under which a shareholder, or a group of up to 20 shareholders, owning at least three percent3% of our outstanding common shares continuously for at least three years, may nominate and include in our proxy materials director nominees constituting up to the greater of two nominees or 20% of the Board, if the shareholders and the nominees satisfy the requirements specified in our Restated Code of Regulations.

If you intend to request that director nominees be included in our proxy materials under our proxy access provision, you must comply with the notice and other requirements set forth in our Restated Code of Regulations. Among other requirements, you must deliver proper written notice to our Corporate Secretarycorporate secretary at our principal executive officeoffices no earlier than April 29, 2019[ ], 2021 and not later than the close of business on May 29, 2019.[ ], 2021. If the date of the 20192021 Annual Meeting of Shareholders is more than 30 days before, or

www.cardinalhealth.com

Cardinal Health|2018 Proxy Statement56


Back to Contents

more than 60 days after, November 7, 2019,4, 2021, written notice must be delivered after the close of business on the 150th day prior to the meeting, but before the close of business on the later of the 120th day prior to the meeting or the 10th day after we first publicly announce the date of the meeting.

Corporate Governance GuidelinesDocuments

You can find the full text of our Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation, Restated Code of Regulations and Corporate Governance Guidelines on our website at www.cardinalhealth.com under “About Us — Corporate — Investor Relations — Corporate Governance — Corporate Governance Documents.” This information also is available in print (free of charge) to any shareholder who requests it from our Investor Relations department.

Transfer Agent

Shareholders of record should direct communications regarding change of address, transfer of share ownership, lost share certificates and other matters regarding their share ownership to Computershare Trust Company, N.A., P.O. Box 505000, Louisville, KY 40233. Our transfer agent may also be contacted via the Internet at www.computershare.com/investor or by telephone at (877) 498-8861 or (781) 575-2879.

Other Information

Cardinal Health | 2020 Proxy Statement    61

This solicitation of proxies is made by and on behalf of the Board. The cost of the solicitation will be borne by Cardinal Health. In addition to solicitation by mail, proxies may be solicited by our directors, officers and employees in person or by telephone or other means of communication. These individuals will receive no additional compensation for soliciting proxies but may be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses in connection with such solicitation. We have retained Alliance Advisors at an estimated cost of $16,500, plus reimbursement of expenses, to assist in our solicitation of proxies from brokers, nominees, institutions and individuals. We also will make arrangements with custodians, nominees and fiduciaries to forward proxy solicitation materials to beneficial owners of shares held of record by such custodians, nominees and fiduciaries, and we will reimburse these persons for reasonable expenses they may incur.

If you and other residents at your mailing address own common shares in street name, your broker or bank may have sent you a notice that your household will receive only one set of proxy materials unless you instruct otherwise. This practice is known as “householding,” and is designed to reduce our printing and postage costs. However, if you wish to receive, now or in the future, a separate annual report and proxy statement, you may write to our Investor Relations department at 7000 Cardinal Place, Dublin, Ohio 43017, or call the Investor Relations Line at (614) 757-4757. We will promptly deliver a separate copy (free of charge) upon request. If you and other residents at your mailing address are currently receiving multiple copies of annual reports and proxy statements and wish to receive only a single copy, you should contact your broker or bank directly.

By Order of the Board of Directors.

September 26, 2018

JessicaL.Mayer
ExecutiveVicePresident,DeputyGeneralCounsel
andCorporateSecretary

Cardinal Health|2018 Proxy Statement57


Back to Contents

Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures

This proxy statement contains financial measures that are not calculated in accordance with U.S generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”).GAAP. In addition to analyzing our business based on financial information prepared in accordance with GAAP, we use these non-GAAP financial measures internally to evaluate our performance, evaluate the balance sheet, engage in financial and operational planning and determine incentive compensation because we believe that these measures provide additional perspective on and, in some circumstances are more closely correlated to, the performance of our underlying, ongoing business. We provide these non-GAAP financial measures to investors as supplemental metrics to assist readers in assessing the effects of items and events on our financial and operating results on a year-over-year basis and in comparing our performance to that of our competitors. However, the non-GAAP financial measures that we use may be calculated differently from, and therefore may not be comparable to, similarly titled measures used by other companies. The non-GAAP financial measures disclosed by us should not be considered a substitute for, or superior to, financial measures calculated in accordance with GAAP, and the financial results calculated in accordance with GAAP and reconciliations to those financial statements set forth below should be carefully evaluated.

Exclusions from Non-GAAP Financial Measures

Management believes it is useful to exclude the following items from the non-GAAP financial measures presented in this report for its own and for investors’ assessment of the business for the reasons identified below:

LIFOchargesandcredits are excluded because the factors that influence last-in, first-out (“LIFO”) inventory charges or credits, such as pharmaceutical manufacturer price appreciation or deflation and year-end inventory levels (which can be meaningfully influenced by customer buying behavior immediately preceding our fiscal year-end), are largely out of our control and cannot be accurately predicted. The exclusion of LIFO charges and credits from non-GAAP financial measures facilitates comparison of our current financial results to our historical financial results and to our peer group companies’ financial results. We did not recognize any LIFO charges or credits during the periods presented.

Surgicalgownrecallcosts includes inventory write-offs and certain remediation and supply disruption costs arising from the January 2020 recall of select Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation (“AAMI”) Level 3 surgical gowns and voluntary field actions (a recall of some packs and a corrective action allowing overlabeling of other packs) for Presource Procedure Packs containing affected gowns. We have excluded these costs from our non-GAAP metrics to allow investors to better understand the underlying operating results of the business and to facilitate comparison of our current financial results to our historical financial results and to our peer group companies’ financial results.

Stateopioidassessmentsrelatedtopriorfiscalyears is the portion of state assessments for prescription opioid medications that were sold or distributed in periods prior to the fiscal year of the initial assessment. This portion is excluded from non-GAAP financial measures because it is retrospectively applied to sales in prior fiscal years and inclusion would obscure analysis of the current fiscal year results of our underlying, ongoing business. Additionally, while states’ laws may require us to make payments on an ongoing basis, the portion of the assessment related to sales in prior periods is contemplated to consist of one-time, nonrecurring items. Reversals of these accruals have occurred when certain assessments were found by a court to be unconstitutional.

Restructuring and employee severance costs are excluded because they are not part of the ongoing operations of our underlying business.

Amortization and other acquisition-related costs, which include transaction costs, integration costs and changes in the fair value of contingent consideration obligations, are excluded primarily for consistency with the presentationbecause they are not part of the ongoing operations of our underlying business and to facilitate comparison of our current financial results ofto our historical financial results and to our peer group companies.companies’ financial results. Additionally, costs for amortization of acquisition-related intangible assets are non-cash amounts, which are variable in amount and frequency and are significantly impacted by the timing and size of acquisitions, so their exclusion facilitates comparison of historical, current and forecasted financial results. We also exclude other acquisition-related costs, which are directly related to an acquisition, but do not meet the criteria to be recognized on the acquired entity’s initial balance sheet as part of the purchase price allocation. These costs are also significantly impacted by the timing, complexity and size of acquisitions.

Impairments and gain or loss on disposal of assets are excluded because they do not occur in, or reflect the ordinary course of, our ongoing business operations and are inherently unpredictable in timing and amount, and in the case of impairments, are non-cash amounts, so their exclusion facilitates comparison of historical, current and forecasted financial results.

Litigation recoveries or charges, net, which include loss contingencies related to disputes,for certain litigation and regulatory matters and income from the favorable resolution of litigation, and certain defense costs related to mass tort product liability claims, are excluded because they often relate to events that may have occurred in prior or multiple periods, do not occur in or reflect the ordinary course of our business and are inherently unpredictable in timing and amount.

Loss onearly extinguishment of debt is excluded because it does not typically occur in the normal course of business and may obscure analysis of trends and financial performance. Additionally, the amount and frequency of this type of charge is not consistent and is significantly impacted by the timing and size of debt extinguishment transactions.

GainonsaleofequityinterestinnaviHealth was incurred in connection with the sale of our remaining equity interest in naviHealth in

www.cardinalhealth.com

Cardinal Health | 2020 Proxy Statement    62


Back to Contents

fiscal 2020. The equity interest was retained in connection with the initial sale of our majority interest in naviHealth during fiscal 2019. We exclude this significant gain because gains or losses on investments of this magnitude do not typically occur in the normal course of business and are similar in nature to a gain or loss from a divestiture of a majority interest, which we exclude from non-GAAP results. The gain on the initial sale of our majority interest in naviHealth in fiscal 2019 was also excluded from our non-GAAP financial measures.

Transitional tax benefit, net related to the U.S. Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 is excluded because it results from the one-time impact during the one-year measurement period of a very significant change in the U.S. federal corporate tax rate and, due to the significant size of the benefit, obscures analysis of trends and financial performance. The transitional tax benefit includes the initial estimate and measurement periodsubsequent adjustments for the re-measurement of deferred tax assets and liabilities due to the reduction of the U.S. federal corporate income tax rate and the repatriation tax on undistributed foreign earnings, both of which are subject to adjustment during an up to 12-month measurement period.earnings.

The tax effect for each of the items listed above, other than the transitional tax benefit item, is determined using the tax rate and other tax attributes applicable to the item and the jurisdiction(s) in which the item is recorded. The gross, tax and net impact of each item are presented with our GAAP to non-GAAP reconciliations.

Fiscal 2020 GAAP to Non-GAAP Reconciliations

(in millions, except for per share amounts)

Operating

Earnings/(Loss)

($)

Operating

Earnings/(Loss)

Growth Rate

(%)

Earnings/(Loss)

Before Income

Taxes

($)

Provision For/

(Benefit From)

Income Taxes

($)

Net Earnings/

(Loss)

Attributable to

Cardinal

Health, Inc.

($)

Diluted

Earnings/(Loss)

Per Share

Attributable to

Cardinal

Health, Inc.

($)(1)

Diluted

Earnings/(Loss)

Per Share

Attributable to

Cardinal

Health, Inc.

Growth Rate

(%)

GAAP

(4,098)

N.M.

(3,772)

(79)

(3,696)

(12.61)

N.M.

Surgical gown recall costs

85

 

85

22

63

0.22

 

State opioid assessment related to prior fiscal years

3

 

3

1

2

0.01

 

Restructuring and employee severance

122

 

122

29

93

0.31

 

Amortization and other acquisition-related costs

524

 

524

130

394

1.34

 

Impairments and (gain)/loss on disposal of assets

7

 

7

2

5

0.02

 

Litigation (recoveries)/charges, net(2)

5,741

 

5,741

514

5,227

17.84

 

Loss on early extinguishment of debt

 

16

4

12

0.04

 

Gain on sale of equity interest in naviHealth

 

(579)

(86)

(493)

(1.68)

 

Transitional tax benefit, net

 

2

(2)

(0.01)

 

NON-GAAP

2,384

1

2,147

539

1,605

5.45

3

The sum of the components and certain computations may reflect rounding adjustments.

 

(1)

GAAP diluted loss per share attributable to Cardinal Health, Inc. and the EPS impact from the GAAP to non-GAAP per share reconciling items are calculated using a weighted average of 293 million common shares, which excludes potentially dilutive securities from the denominator due to their anti-dilutive effects resulting from our GAAP net loss for the period. Non-GAAP diluted EPS is calculated using a weighted average of 295 million common shares, which includes potentially dilutive shares.

(2)

Pharmaceutical wholesale distributors, including us, have been named as defendants in over 3,000 lawsuits relating to the distribution of prescription opioid pain medications. These lawsuits also name pharmaceutical manufacturers, retail pharmacy chains and other entities as defendants. Approximately 2,800 of these lawsuits have been filed by counties, municipalities, cities and political subdivisions in various federal, state, and other courts. In October 2019, we agreed in principle to a global settlement framework with a leadership group of state attorneys general that is designed to resolve all pending and future opioid lawsuits and claims by states and political subdivisions and includes, among other things, a cash component, under which we would pay up to $5.56 billion over 18 years. In connection with this and with an October 2019 settlement with two Ohio counties, we recorded a total pre-tax charge of $5.63 billion ($5.14 billion after tax or $17.54 per share) during fiscal 2020 in litigation (recoveries)/charges, net, in the condensed consolidated statement of earnings, which was excluded from our fiscal 2020 non-GAAP financial measures. Our long-standing practice has been to exclude litigation charges like this from our non-GAAP financial measures because they often relate to events that may have occurred in prior or multiple periods, do not occur in or reflect the ordinary course of our business and are inherently unpredictable in timing and amount.

We did not adjust our fiscal 2020 non-GAAP financial measures to exclude opioid-related litigation defense costs, which adversely impacted our fiscal 2020 non-GAAP operating earnings by approximately $103 million. We also did not adjust for opioid-related compliance costs. Accordingly, our non-GAAP financial measures included opioid-related litigation defense and compliance costs.

www.cardinalhealth.com

Cardinal Health|20182020 Proxy Statement58    63


Back to Contents

Fiscal 2018 GAAPDefinitions

Non-GAAPoperatingearnings is operating earnings/(loss) excluding LIFO charges/(credits), surgical gown recall costs, state opioid assessment related to prior fiscal years, restructuring and employee severance, amortization and other acquisition-related costs, impairments and (gain)/loss on disposal of assets, and litigation (recoveries)/charges, net.

Non-GAAP ReconciliationsnetearningsattributabletoCardinalHealth,Inc.is net earnings/(loss) attributable to Cardinal Health, Inc. excluding LIFO charges/(credits), surgical gown recall costs, state opioid assessment related to prior fiscal years, restructuring and employee severance, amortization and other acquisition-related costs, impairments and (gain)/loss on disposal of assets, litigation (recoveries)/charges, net, loss on early extinguishment of debt and gain on sale of equity interest in naviHealth, each net of tax, and transitional tax benefit, net.

(in millions, except for per share amounts)

Operating

Earnings

($)

Earnings/(Loss)

Before Income Taxes

($)

Provision For

Income Taxes

($)

Net Earnings

Attributable

to Cardinal

Health, Inc.

($)

Diluted EPS

Attributable

to Cardinal

Health, Inc.

($)

 

GAAP

126

(228)

(487)

259

0.81

 

Restructuring and employee severance

176

176

25

151

0.48

 

Amortization and other acquisition-related costs

707

707

176

531

1.69

 

Impairments and loss on disposal of assets(1)

1,417

1,417

(44)

1,461

4.64

 

Litigation (recoveries)/charges, net

159

159

48

111

0.35

 

Loss on extinguishment of debt

2

1

1

 

Transitional tax benefit, net(2)

936

(936)

(2.97)

 

NON-GAAP(3)

2,585

2,233

655

1,578

5.00

 

(1)

Includes a non-cash goodwill impairment charge of $1.4 billion related to our Medical segment. There was no tax benefit related to this goodwill impairment charge.

(2)

Reflects the estimated net transitional benefit from the re-measurement of our deferred tax assets and liabilities partially offset by the repatriation tax on cash and earnings of foreign subsidiaries. We have not yet completed our analysis of the impact of the U.S. Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 and, as such, these amounts are provisional estimates and we may record additional provisional amounts or adjustments to the provisional amounts in future periods.

(3)

Non-GAAP operating earnings is operating earnings excluding LIFO charges/(credits), restructuring and employee severance, amortization and other acquisition-related costs, impairments and (gain)/loss on disposal of assets and litigation (recoveries)/charges. Non-GAAP diluted EPS attributable to Cardinal Health, Inc. is non-GAAP net earnings attributable to Cardinal Health, Inc. divided by diluted weighted average shares outstanding. Non-GAAP net earnings attributable to Cardinal Health, Inc. is net earnings attributable to Cardinal Health, Inc. excluding LIFO charges/(credits), restructuring and employee severance, amortization and other acquisition-related costs, impairments and (gain)/loss on disposal of assets, litigation (recoveries)/charges, net, and loss on extinguishment of debt, each net of tax, and transitional tax benefit, net, related to the U.S. Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017.

Non-GAAPdilutedearningspershareattributabletoCardinalHealth,Inc.is non-GAAP net earnings/(loss) attributable to Cardinal Health, Inc. divided by diluted weighted average shares outstanding.

 

www.cardinalhealth.com

Cardinal Health | 2020 Proxy Statement    64


Cardinal Health|2018 Proxy Statement59Back to Contents


Back to Contents


Back to Contents

Back to Contents